Anarchy in practice.

[anon_xl72qcu5isp39]

I guess it's just one of those stories you haven't followed.

Or that you made up.

I think that you've been informed by so much Hannity et al and right wing rhetoric you think that lying and straw men is just how it's done. It's not, and it's "the left's" fault for not stopping at the first lie in an avalanche of bullshit and challenging it. I'll respectfully decline to stop enabling that conduct. Your first gratuitous, ad hominem, deceptive attack in this thread is sorted out. Two out of three, whatever. But you had the hat trick.

The sooner the country identifies who is misleading who, how, and why, the sooner we can operate from real facts and the sooner this country re-assumes its rightful place as The Superpower.

 

[CSCOTTOSUPOKES]

@Medic007 still waiting on those quotes of mine defending Islamic violence...

Tick, tock...


(silence)



Bullshit meter pegged to 11

 

[Medic007]

@Medic007 still waiting on those quotes of mine defending Islamic violence...

Tick, tock...


(silence)



Bullshit meter pegged to 11

Let's hear you say that genital mutilation practiced by Muslims is barbaric...

 

[CSCOTTOSUPOKES]

Let's hear you say that genital mutilation practiced by Muslims is barbaric...

It’s barbaric...


now let’s hear you admit you lied...about a lot.

 

[Medic007]

It’s barbaric...


now let’s hear you admit you lied...about a lot.

Was that difficult for you? You offer a ton of criticism toward Christians, but none toward the followers of a religion that practice genital mutilation. How come?

 

[CSCOTTOSUPOKES]

Was that difficult for you? You offer a ton of criticism toward Christians, but none toward the followers of a religion that practice genital mutilation. How come?

Deflection...

Admit you lied.

 

[Medic007]

Deflection...

Admit you lied.

How come you don't offer criticism of Muslims like you do Christians?

 

[my_2cents]

Deflection...

Admit you lied.

And while you are doing this @Medic007, I'm stil wondering . . . if one opposes discriminating against Muslims or characterizing all Muslims as the same, would you consider that to be defending Islam?

 

[Medic007]

And while you are doing this @Medic007, I'm stil wondering . . . if one opposes discriminating against Muslims or characterizing all Muslims as the same, would you consider that to be defending Islam?

I'll answer your question if you can post any passage from the Constitution that implicitly forbade secession and made it illegal at the time of the Civil War. That shouldn't be difficult to do.

 

[CSCOTTOSUPOKES]

I'll answer your question if you can post any passage from the Constitution that implicitly forbade secession and made it illegal at the time of the Civil War. That shouldn't be difficult to do.

Don’t forget to admit you lied about my past posts concerning religion on this board.

 

[Medic007]

Don’t forget to admit you lied about my past posts concerning religion on this board.

Prove me wrong.

 

[my_2cents]

I'll answer your question if you can post any passage from the Constitution that implicitly forbade secession and made it illegal at the time of the Civil War. That shouldn't be difficult to do.

Ok, but I am not going to rehash that conversation with you. I'll give you two passages that were cited at the time (and are still cited): Article I, Section 10 and Article VI, Clause 2.

Now, your turn: If one opposes discriminating against Muslims or characterizing all Muslims as the same, would you consider that to be defending Islam? Yes or no?

 

[CSCOTTOSUPOKES]

Prove me wrong.

Already done...by committee lol. How Trumpian - lie and then deflect, distract and lie to cover up the lie.

It’s another in a long list of defeats you’ve suffered over the years. It reads like a bad novel.

Do better haha

 

[CSCOTTOSUPOKES]

Also notable...still rent-free in your head. 24/7

Don’t feel bad tho. You’re obviously not alone haha

 

[CSCOTTOSUPOKES]

@Medic007 still waiting for that admittance of lying...

 

[Medic007]

Ok, but I am not going to rehash that conversation with you. I'll give you two passages that were cited at the time (and are still cited): Article I, Section 10 and Article VI, Clause 2.

Nothing in Article I Section 10 references secession. In fact, if a state were to have seceded, Article I Section 10 would no longer apply.

Nothing in Article VI Clause 2 about secession either.

I'm looking for the passage(s) that implicitly forbade secession and made it illegal. Keep searching maybe?

 

[CSCOTTOSUPOKES]

Nothing in Article I Section 10 references secession. In fact, if a state were to have seceded, Article I Section 10 would no longer apply.

Nothing in Article VI Clause 2 about secession either.

I'm looking for the passage(s) that implicitly forbade secession and made it illegal. Keep searching maybe?

Tick...tock

 

[my_2cents]

Nothing in Article I Section 10 references secession. In fact, if a state were to have seceded, Article I Section 10 would no longer apply.

Nothing in Article VI Clause 2 about secession either.

I'm looking for the passage(s) that implicitly forbade secession and made it illegal. Keep searching maybe?

And I gave you two passages that implicitly do so and have been referenced often when discussing this issue. I never claimed the passages explicitly forbade secession, which apparently is what you are looking for. I answered your question, as you requested.

And now, please answer the question I've asked you numerous times on this thread. It isn't a hard question to answer:

If one opposes discriminating against Muslims or characterizing all Muslims as the same, would you consider that to be defending Islam?

 

[Medic007]

And I gave you two passages that implicitly do so and have been referenced often when discussing this issue. I never claimed the passages explicitly forbade secession, which apparently is what you are looking for. I answered your question, as you requested.

I didn't ask a question. And you didn't fulfill the request. What you posted doesn't implicitly or explicitly forbid secession. Maybe you can post some of the discussions that have referenced Article I Section 10 and Article VI Clause 2 often.

 

[my_2cents]

I didn't ask a question. And you didn't fulfill the request. What you posted doesn't implicitly or explicitly forbid secession. Maybe you can post some of the discussions that have referenced Article I Section 10 and Article VI Clause 2 often.

Or maybe you can stop dodging and deflecting and answer the simple question I've asked you numerous times on this thread. Why can't you answer it? It isn't a hard question at all.

Once again...

If one opposes discriminating against Muslims or characterizing all Muslims as the same, would you consider that to be defending Islam?

 

[Medic007]

Or maybe you can stop dodging and deflecting

This is like a drug deal. You pay the money and then you can have the heroin. If you can't fulfill a very simple request with specific information, I'm not going to waste my time answering your question.

 

[my_2cents]

This is like a drug deal. You pay the money and then you can have the heroin. If you can't fulfill a very simple request with specific information, I'm not going to waste my time answering your question.

haha, you ask for the passages, I give them to you. Then you ask for sources that use them. After that, you will ask for something else. All to avoid answering a simple question that apparently exposes your flawed reasoning and misrepresentations.

This was a rough thread for you Medic. Better luck next time.

 

[Medic007]

haha, you ask for the passages, I give them to you. Then you ask for sources that use them. After that, you will ask for something else. All to avoid answering a simple question that apparently exposes your flawed reasoning and misrepresentations.

This was a rough thread for you Medic. Better luck next time.

Meh, you can't deliver as usual. I'd hate to see your "law school" grades. But Ds get degrees, right?

 

[Medic007]

If one opposes discriminating against Muslims or characterizing all Muslims as the same, would you consider that to be defending Islam?

The answer is no. Muslims are people who follow Islam. Islam is a religion. I'm against any form of religious discrimination.

Let me know how that exposes my flawed reasoning...

 

[my_2cents]

The answer is no. Muslims are people who follow Islam. Islam is a religion. I'm against any form of religious discrimination.

Let me know how that exposes my flawed reasoning...

haha, I knew that comment would get you to finally answer the question.

Thank you. Good see that we agree on that.

 

[Medic007]

haha, I knew that comment would get you to finally answer the question.

Thank you. Good see that we agree on that.

That comment didn't get me to answer it. I planned on answering it once I was done swatting you around and once again proving you're full of crap. You delivered. lol

Carry on.

 

[CSCOTTOSUPOKES]

That comment didn't get me to answer it. I planned on answering it once I was done swatting you around and once again proving you're full of crap. You delivered. lol

Carry on.

Tick...tock

 

[Medic007]

Tick...tock

Prove me wrong.

 

[my_2cents]

That comment didn't get me to answer it.

Yeah it did. You are rather predictable Medic.

Like I said, rough thread for you. First sy, then CScott, then me. And you still haven't addressed @CSCOTTOSUPOKES request lol.

 

[my_2cents]

Tick...tock

And on it goes haha...

 

[CSCOTTOSUPOKES]

Prove me wrong.

You’ve been proven wrong...you just need to admit the lie and move on lol

 

[Medic007]

You’ve been proven wrong...you just need to admit the lie and move on lol

Where? You haven't proven me wrong.

 

[Medic007]

Yeah it did. You are rather predictable Medic.

Like I said, rough thread for you. First sy, then CScott, then me. And you still haven't addressed @CSCOTTOSUPOKES request lol.

Predictably able to call out your BS yes I am. It's easy.

Now tell me how you exposed my flawed reasoning, "counselor." lol haha

 

[Medic007]

You’ve been proven wrong...you just need to admit the lie and move on lol

You're an idiot. lol haha

 

[Medic007]

Tick...tock

Can't handle the #facts and me winning. Keep digging tho lol haha

 

[CSCOTTOSUPOKES]

I certainly agree with aspects of his ideologies, but likely not all or even a solid majority of them. I know how he feels about guns, and it’s a little over the top. It’s personal for him, but yes he’s a douche.

Where? You haven't proven me wrong.

You're an idiot. lol haha

Can't handle the #facts and me winning. Keep digging tho lol haha

Deflection. Sack up and admit the lie. You’re only hurting yourself here lol

 

[CSCOTTOSUPOKES]

@Medic007 is taking the Humpty Trumpty approach...lie and then deflect, attack, dismiss, lie some more to attempt to downplay the original lie, never openly admit deceit.

Tick tock.......(you know where this is going don’t let me put up shop and place a sign on your head rent-free)

 

[Medic007]

@Medic007 is taking the Humpty Trumpty approach...lie and then deflect, attack, dismiss, lie some more to attempt to downplay the original lie, never openly admit deceit.

Tick tock.......(you know where this is going don’t let me put up shop and place a sign on your head rent-free)

Obama operated no differently than the Iranian Mullahs, Muslim Brotherhood, or other Muslim leaders he deeply admires.

*expression of overt racism and xenophobic rhetoric*

I haven't seen to many people defend the Iranian mullahs and the Muslim Brotherhood...

 

[CSCOTTOSUPOKES]

I haven't seen to many people defend the Iranian mullahs and the Muslim Brotherhood...

Yup, that’s what I did haha - “defend” them.

Admit (confess) your lie(s) (sin(s)) now, repent and thou shalt be saved.

 

[Medic007]

Yup, that’s what I did haha - “defend” them.

Admit (confess) your lie(s) (sin(s)) now, repent and thou shalt be saved.

You seem to dislike the #facts.

Tick...tock