1.4M views in 30 minutes lolz
2.2M in 45
who needs Fox again???
c’mon out with it
2.2M in 45
who needs Fox again???
c’mon out with it
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tucker has some big old hairy balls to try and take on the Washington Cartel.Tucker will be alright.
I'll go out on a limb here, so did Limbaugh. 😁Tucker has some big old hairy balls to try and take on the Washington Cartel.
It's all secret and you do not have the need to know. Trust your leaders and do as you are told, peasant.16M in 3 hours.
I'm just confused on most medias and politicians positions on the Ukraine Russia war.
Ain't a of em know what they're talking about either. 👍16M in 3 hours.
I'm just confused on most medias and politicians positions on the Ukraine Russia war.
Yes. 👍This format could wipe out cable news
🙏This format could wipe out cable news
In other words his wifes purse was kicked out of her hands. 🤣tucker says they are the modern day shortwave radio to east bloc countries
ccp/dnc dave caught that one in the nuts
You old bastards have no idea how the internet works. If you think 71 million people have watched it, you’re clueless. Look at likes, replies, shares, etc… Elon is playing the alt right like a fiddle.
How many have watched it?You old bastards have no idea how the internet works. If you think 71 million people have watched it, you’re clueless. Look at likes, replies, shares, etc… Elon is playing the alt right like a fiddle.
The top line analytics suggest perhaps 2 million with maybe 10% of that watching in full.How many have watched it?
I love how some are trying their best to discount Tuckers Twitter release. The fact that the tweet itself has been seen by over 70 million people is not something that can be discounted. Admittedly I know nothing about Twitter, don't have a twat or whatever it's called but I do know him returning has created quite the buzz around the country.The top line analytics suggest perhaps 2 million with maybe 10% of that watching in full.
The top line analytics suggest perhaps 2 million with maybe 10% of that watching in full.
The top line analytics suggest perhaps 2 million with maybe 10% of that watching in full.
Brother! 👍That’s probably only applicable back when Twitter operations were run by former cia and fbi employees.
All these articles do nothing but help. Look at those leftists get tucker views.I love how some are trying their best to discount Tuckers Twitter release. The fact that the tweet itself has been seen by over 70 million people is not something that can be discounted. Admittedly I know nothing about Twitter, don't have a twat or whatever it's called but I do know him returning has created quite the buzz around the country.
First episode of ‘Tucker on Twitter’ nets more than 70 million views
The first episode of Tucker Carlson’s new show on Twitter earned tens of millions of views on the platform. The 10-minute video, posted Tuesday evening, had been viewed about 73 million times…thehill.com
Tucker Carlson’s Twitter Launch Clocks Tens of Millions of Views – but Far, Far Lower Actual Engagement
According to Twitter's FAQ, practically anything can count as a view; not so for likes, retweets and replieswww.yahoo.com
Rest assured joes on top of the silence.All these articles do nothing but help. Look at those leftists get tucker views.
What matters most to Tuckems is monetization. He might clear 5 figures on that vid which likely covered his production costs. Until he turns on subscriptions he won't get close to what a night on Fox made him.That’s probably only applicable back when Twitter operations were run by former cia and fbi employees.
What matters most to Tuckems is monetization. He might clear 5 figures on that vid which likely covered his production costs. Until he turns on subscriptions he won't get close to what a night on Fox made him.
What matters most to Tuckems is monetization. He might clear 5 figures on that vid which likely covered his production costs. Until he turns on subscriptions he won't get close to what a night on Fox made him.
Rush is laughing right about now. Good luck.What matters most to Tuckems is monetization. He might clear 5 figures on that vid which likely covered his production costs. Until he turns on subscriptions he won't get close to what a night on Fox made him.
Joes got ya son. Now appreciate his dandelion. 🤣What matters most to Tuckems is monetization. He might clear 5 figures on that vid which likely covered his production costs. Until he turns on subscriptions he won't get close to what a night on Fox made him.
I'm going by what is typical for a content creator on the Tweeter. Might Elon have cut Tuckems a special deal? Sure. Is it anywhere close to what Tuckems was making at Fox? Doubtful given he made about $250k per night at Fox.Do you have insight into the specific deal between Elon and Tucker or just going by the old rules?
I'm going by what is typical for a content creator on the Tweeter. Might Elon have cut Tuckems a special deal? Sure. Is it anywhere close to what Tuckems was making at Fox? Doubtful given he made about $250k per night at Fox.
I have a general idea, but you seem to have all the deets. Share dude.So you have no idea coupled with a strong opinion.
I have a general idea, but you seem to have all the deets. Share dude.
And oh BTW - the only monetization it seems on Twitter now is through subscriptions so amend my estimate of Tuckems take on that video down to zero. My bad, I misunderstood the monetization formula announced in April.
Is Fox News now part of the Washington Cartel?Tucker has some big old hairy balls to try and take on the Washington Cartel.