Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is almost like he just spouts off whatever BS he thinks he can get away with:
http://news.investors.com/ibd-edito...ppen-elsewhere-and-more-frequently.htm?p=full
Lol. This stuff doesn't even surprise me anymore.
People say he's damn near genius intelligence. Bullshit.
I'm becoming convinced that the guy lives in a construct within his own mind, fortified to a very ineffective level, and subject to the relativism of reality that one would expect of a "fortified world" within one's mind.
All of us do this, perceive the world through our own inner construct. The unfortunate thing with him, however, is what appears to be the absence of a "self-check" mechansim. Again, a mechanism most of us have, to varying degrees, constantly assimilating "real world" reality, and using what we've learned to edify our individual construct. This allows the individual, obviously, to challenge themselves, their "reality," with the hopeful outcome to bettet adapt in becoming "effective" as an individual in satisfying whatever "values" propel them, from the self-centered to the altruistic.
It speaks volumes about the character of an individual, in my opinion, to see a willingness to embrace a healthy self check mechanism.
The alternative, as we see, is a person disconnected from reality, and in the case of President Obama, inclined to push his inner reality.... his disconnect is apparent by the number of his large failures, from a crumpling, "defining" domestic piece to what I ultimately think will be his biggest legacy:
His inability to better see the world for what it is, ultimately is putting the U.S. population in greater danger given the different levers he COULD have been pulled compared to those that he DID pull.
Terrorism now lives with us. I'm trying to think of a string of decisions he had made over the past 7 years that helped blunt that (let alone accelerate its arrival).
He's a narcissist, to a huge degree. Also this just in, FBI says it was terrorism:
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-san-bernardino-shooting-isis-20151204-story.html
Lol. This stuff doesn't even surprise me anymore.
People say he's damn near genius intelligence. Bullshit.
I'm becoming convinced that the guy lives in a construct within his own mind, fortified to a very ineffective level, and subject to the relativism of reality that one would expect of a "fortified world" within one's mind.
All of us do this, perceive the world through our own inner construct. The unfortunate thing with him, however, is what appears to be the absence of a "self-check" mechansim. Again, a mechanism most of us have, to varying degrees, constantly assimilating "real world" reality, and using what we've learned to edify our individual construct. This allows the individual, obviously, to challenge themselves, their "reality," with the hopeful outcome to bettet adapt in becoming "effective" as an individual in satisfying whatever "values" propel them, from the self-centered to the altruistic.
It speaks volumes about the character of an individual, in my opinion, to see a willingness to embrace a healthy self check mechanism.
The alternative, as we see, is a person disconnected from reality, and in the case of President Obama, inclined to push his inner reality.... his disconnect is apparent by the number of his large failures, from a crumpling, "defining" domestic piece to what I ultimately think will be his biggest legacy:
His inability to better see the world for what it is, ultimately is putting the U.S. population in greater danger given the different levers he COULD have been pulled compared to those that he DID pull.
Terrorism now lives with us. I'm trying to think of a string of decisions he had made over the past 7 years that helped blunt that (let alone accelerate its arrival).
The problem with the left's idea of gun control is that it will not work. California's laws didn't stop Bonmed and Clyhmad from getting everything the needed to do their deed. Oh, so the problem is that they could get what they needed from a neighboring state that has less laws? Sure they can.
So let's pretend that all 50 states and every territory had the strictest gun laws on tap, including gun ownership being illegal. Although that is the wet dream of the left, it won't put a dent in our problem. Law abiding citizens would abide by the law because that's what we do. Criminals would not because that's what they do. There is no shortage of unscrupulous people ready to fill the void to satiate the appetite of the criminal enterprise. But, but, but Australia! Yep, and they don't share a porous border with a country like Mexico. Not convinced? If you live in a fantasy world like limousine liberals you likely won't be aware of reality even when it's taking a dump on your upper lip.
Let me tell you a little story about methamphetamine. Oklahoma has taken the lead in anti-meth legislation. It's labor intensive to buy pseudoephedrine these days. The prevailing thought was that by taking away the meth cook's ability to acquire the necessary precursor, meth would mostly be a thing of the past. Meth labs are hard to come by these days thanks to the continued legislation regarding pseudoephedrine. If only the meth labs were the problem. Thanks to legislation putting meth labs out of business, we now have more meth at lower prices and more purity than ever before. Our meth laws enabled the drug cartels to expand their portfolio. Mexico tried to solve the problem by restricting the importation of pseudoephedrine. Results? No disruption in manufacturing. Cartel labs make meth the Walter White way that doesn't require pseudoephedrine. The result? Tons of dirt cheap 98% pure meth cross the border every day, bound for use in your town. Meth use is at an all time high. I wonder why?
Anybody that believes that "common sense" gun reforms will stop criminals from getting what they want is either ignorant or incapable of critical thinking. Ban gun manufacturing and ban gun ownership. It won't do anything but remove the last line of defense the general public has from criminals of any sort. Maybe if the US was an island the idea would work. But we aren't and all of the gun laws conceivable won't stop a criminal from getting his/her hands on what they want.
Meth and Europe ought to be illustrative of the reality. I know the left is in love with the agenda and doesn't let the outcome, no matter how poor, get in the way. One only has to look at slavery and segregation to understand. The sad thing though is that in 30 years, the left will be preaching what the right is today, well after it has mattered.
The guy is always full of shit, but so are all politicians generally speaking. I don't even really mind any of the lying anymore. It's the lemmings that lap it up like a starved kitten that irritate me.
" In just 2015, France suffered more casualties – killings and injuries – from mass public shootings than the U.S. has suffered during Obama’s entire presidency (508 to 424). This number includes the San Bernandino massacre on Wednesday."
Link
The problem with the left's idea of gun control is that it will not work. California's laws didn't stop Bonmed and Clyhmad from getting everything the needed to do their deed. Oh, so the problem is that they could get what they needed from a neighboring state that has less laws? Sure they can.
So let's pretend that all 50 states and every territory had the strictest gun laws on tap, including gun ownership being illegal. Although that is the wet dream of the left, it won't put a dent in our problem. Law abiding citizens would abide by the law because that's what we do. Criminals would not because that's what they do. There is no shortage of unscrupulous people ready to fill the void to satiate the appetite of the criminal enterprise. But, but, but Australia! Yep, and they don't share a porous border with a country like Mexico. Not convinced? If you live in a fantasy world like limousine liberals you likely won't be aware of reality even when it's taking a dump on your upper lip.
Let me tell you a little story about methamphetamine. Oklahoma has taken the lead in anti-meth legislation. It's labor intensive to buy pseudoephedrine these days. The prevailing thought was that by taking away the meth cook's ability to acquire the necessary precursor, meth would mostly be a thing of the past. Meth labs are hard to come by these days thanks to the continued legislation regarding pseudoephedrine. If only the meth labs were the problem. Thanks to legislation putting meth labs out of business, we now have more meth at lower prices and more purity than ever before. Our meth laws enabled the drug cartels to expand their portfolio. Mexico tried to solve the problem by restricting the importation of pseudoephedrine. Results? No disruption in manufacturing. Cartel labs make meth the Walter White way that doesn't require pseudoephedrine. The result? Tons of dirt cheap 98% pure meth cross the border every day, bound for use in your town. Meth use is at an all time high. I wonder why?
Anybody that believes that "common sense" gun reforms will stop criminals from getting what they want is either ignorant or incapable of critical thinking. Ban gun manufacturing and ban gun ownership. It won't do anything but remove the last line of defense the general public has from criminals of any sort. Maybe if the US was an island the idea would work. But we aren't and all of the gun laws conceivable won't stop a criminal from getting his/her hands on what they want.
Meth and Europe ought to be illustrative of the reality. I know the left is in love with the agenda and doesn't let the outcome, no matter how poor, get in the way. One only has to look at slavery and segregation to understand. The sad thing though is that in 30 years, the left will be preaching what the right is today, well after it has mattered.
I'm flattered, but much like you, a juvenile sports rivalry doesn't get in the way of shit that actually matters. It takes nothing but convincing yourself that you're a fan of any particular team to be a fan (as you already know). It takes conviction to stand up for what is right and just. We're very much alike in this area. So, thank you for your love of our country.Medic, you are my only OU friend and I don't even know you. Thank you for your love of our country.
Very good. To expand on your meth analogy, if gun confiscation were imposed the black market for guns would be as great or greater than the black market for meth. Guns would flow across the border. Not everyone has a desire to do drugs but everyone, except liberals who cower in the corner in the fetal position, has an innate desire for self defense of themselves, their property and loved ones.The problem with the left's idea of gun control is that it will not work. California's laws didn't stop Bonmed and Clyhmad from getting everything the needed to do their deed. Oh, so the problem is that they could get what they needed from a neighboring state that has less laws? Sure they can.
So let's pretend that all 50 states and every territory had the strictest gun laws on tap, including gun ownership being illegal. Although that is the wet dream of the left, it won't put a dent in our problem. Law abiding citizens would abide by the law because that's what we do. Criminals would not because that's what they do. There is no shortage of unscrupulous people ready to fill the void to satiate the appetite of the criminal enterprise. But, but, but Australia! Yep, and they don't share a porous border with a country like Mexico. Not convinced? If you live in a fantasy world like limousine liberals you likely won't be aware of reality even when it's taking a dump on your upper lip.
Let me tell you a little story about methamphetamine. Oklahoma has taken the lead in anti-meth legislation. It's labor intensive to buy pseudoephedrine these days. The prevailing thought was that by taking away the meth cook's ability to acquire the necessary precursor, meth would mostly be a thing of the past. Meth labs are hard to come by these days thanks to the continued legislation regarding pseudoephedrine. If only the meth labs were the problem. Thanks to legislation putting meth labs out of business, we now have more meth at lower prices and more purity than ever before. Our meth laws enabled the drug cartels to expand their portfolio. Mexico tried to solve the problem by restricting the importation of pseudoephedrine. Results? No disruption in manufacturing. Cartel labs make meth the Walter White way that doesn't require pseudoephedrine. The result? Tons of dirt cheap 98% pure meth cross the border every day, bound for use in your town. Meth use is at an all time high. I wonder why?
Anybody that believes that "common sense" gun reforms will stop criminals from getting what they want is either ignorant or incapable of critical thinking. Ban gun manufacturing and ban gun ownership. It won't do anything but remove the last line of defense the general public has from criminals of any sort. Maybe if the US was an island the idea would work. But we aren't and all of the gun laws conceivable won't stop a criminal from getting his/her hands on what they want.
Meth and Europe ought to be illustrative of the reality. I know the left is in love with the agenda and doesn't let the outcome, no matter how poor, get in the way. One only has to look at slavery and segregation to understand. The sad thing though is that in 30 years, the left will be preaching what the right is today, well after it has mattered.
Very good. To expand on your meth analogy, if gun confiscation were imposed the black market for guns would be as great or greater than the black market for meth. Guns would flow across the border. Not everyone has a desire to do drugs but everyone, except liberals who cower in the corner in the fetal position, has an innate desire for self defense of themselves, their property and loved ones.
And President Jelly Backbone Muslim is going on TV tonight to regale us once again on the need for more gun control, how global warming is the main threat to ISIS and how letting more of his Muslim relatives into the US unvetted will protect us.
It's no secret why people are supporting non-traditional candidates over professional political class candidates. The intrigue with Trump, Cruz and a few others is much deeper than polls suggest. It's dawning on people across the political spectrum that the US as we know it and grew up in is in jeopardy and the blame squarely lies at the feet of Obama, Hillary, liberal democrats and establishment republicans.The more he presses on those things, I predict the more stirred up opposition to them will become.
What is really interesting is that by pushing his anti-gun agenda President Obama is directly responsible for huge increases in the sales of firearms and ammo.
More people are armed than ever before and conceal carry permits are at record numbers and getting bigger every day.