Yo Harvey. Everyone is addicted to sex.

[MegaPoke]

Or, alternately.. no one is.

Basically there's no such thing.

I had a roadie once who on a long road trip "admitted" to me, our tour manager and his girlfriend that he had "overcome a sex addiction." He even showed us a token like a 'days sober' token.

What he actually turned out to be is a closeted bi/homosexual who got caught by his wife.

I bet the one thing all sex addicts have in common is getting in trouble for f*cking, raping etc. thoughts?

https://www.google.com/amp/www.dail...There-no-thing-sex-addiction-experts-say.html

 

[MegaPoke]

By the way, the tour manager and his girlfriend spent 3 hours trolling the roadie over his sex addiction and my face ached from laughter.

Judge me as you will.

 

[anon_xl72qcu5isp39]

He'll disappear into a Scottsdale retreat with cucumber-flavored water and navajo flute music and come out a new man. He'll say he's finally woke, feels awful, gets it now and go on the daytime women's shows to eat shit and charm his way back.

If "sex addiction" is a real thing, do sex addicts need locked up? I mean, the predicate of addiction is that it's involuntary behavior. Is the general public safe with a sex addict walking down the street?

Personally, I am enjoying the conservative hypocrisy and pearl clutching, newfound media outrage over the obvious, and silence from all the women that just took the role and would probably do it again. Has anybody inventoried all the Miramax starlets that have NOT spoken out?

 

[imprimis]

Ole Harvey may be more addicted than others. So much so that his contract with his company spelled it out.

Weinstein's Get Out Of Jail Free card was that if he committed sexual harassment and his company was sued and paid off, Ole Harv could reimburse the costs incurred by his company and pay his company a $250,000 fine for the first offense, $500,000 for the 2nd, $750,000 for the 3rd and $1 million for the 4th and all subsequent acts. In other words, Weinstein reimburses his company for what his company paid out and pays a fine to his company and all would be forgiven. Seems like commingling of funds is here somewhere.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017...ntract-should-force-his-company-to-close.html

 

[NZ Poke]

 

[OKSTATE1]

Harvey touched every women he could get his hands on, I wonder how Hillary felt he never even laid a serious eye on her? Hillary probably was hoping to catch some action, when a sex addict perv will not touch you? Any wonder she hates men and blames misogyny? Maybe she should go transgender and join the T team. Her so called base would call her a hero and adore her for her brave move.

 

[NZ Poke]

 

[NZ Poke]

Watch:

 

[CBradSmith]

Or, alternately.. no one is.

Basically there's no such thing.

I had a roadie once who on a long road trip "admitted" to me, our tour manager and his girlfriend that he had "overcome a sex addiction." He even showed us a token like a 'days sober' token.

What he actually turned out to be is a closeted bi/homosexual who got caught by his wife.

I bet the one thing all sex addicts have in common is getting in trouble for f*cking, raping etc. thoughts?

https://www.google.com/amp/www.dail...There-no-thing-sex-addiction-experts-say.html

Is consistently overeating an addiction?
Is consistently writing checks you know will bounce an addiction?

Real questions btw. I don't know.

If watching too much porn can "rewire" your brain to the extent it impacts your sex drive in natural settings or sexual interactions, can unmitigated sexual behavior "rewire" the brain?

 

[MegaPoke]

Is consistently overeating an addiction?
Is consistently writing checks you know will bounce an addiction?

Real questions btw. I don't know.

If watching too much porn can "rewire" your brain to the extent it impacts your sex drive in natural settings or sexual interactions, can unmitigated sexual behavior "rewire" the brain?

Unmitigated sexual behavior is simply a natural state when you don't encounter natural boundaries of rejection and/or moral limits.

The richer, more famous and more confident and good looking you are, the more organic sexual opportunities present themselves. What you do with those is a factor of your moral limits.

In Weinstein's case, he's a disgusting troll but is very rich, powerful and famous gatekeeper to fame and wealth these young women covet.

Toxic combo but hardly an addiction. Just a fat piece of shit who abused his gatekeeper postion.

 

[davidallen]

Or, alternately.. no one is.

Basically there's no such thing.

I had a roadie once who on a long road trip "admitted" to me, our tour manager and his girlfriend that he had "overcome a sex addiction." He even showed us a token like a 'days sober' token.

What he actually turned out to be is a closeted bi/homosexual who got caught by his wife.

I bet the one thing all sex addicts have in common is getting in trouble for f*cking, raping etc. thoughts?

https://www.google.com/amp/www.dail...There-no-thing-sex-addiction-experts-say.html

Yes everyone...

 

[davidallen]

Unmitigated sexual behavior is simply a natural state when you don't encounter natural boundaries of rejection and/or moral limits.

The richer, more famous and more confident and good looking you are, the more organic sexual opportunities present themselves. What you do with those is a factor of your moral limits.

In Weinstein's case, he's a disgusting troll but is very rich, powerful and famous gatekeeper to fame and wealth these young women covet.

Toxic combo but hardly an addiction. Just a fat piece of shit who abused his gatekeeper postion.

Sounds familiar...

 

[Medic007]

Yes everyone...

Really hard hitting stuff. Weinstein is actually a current Democrat donor. And Trump isn't the first president with a "past."

 

[OKSTATE1]

Harvey was only ostracized when it became politically beneficial to do so, prior to that he was a sexual predator that was kept a secret to only those external to Hollywood to keep the donations flowing for decades. They also wanted him influencing the liberal agenda. Impossible to take the high road on Harvey now, and look at how Hillary came out after those that came forward on Bill. The hypocrisy on this is at all time high. Hillary also "stood by her man". Why? Votes.

Hillary is a slut for votes.

 

[JimmyBob]

Hillary is a slut for huma tuna

FIFY.

 

[Alpha Poke]

Yes everyone...

Didn't you guys make up a word for this?

You work in irony like Ralphies old man swore.

 

[anon_xl72qcu5isp39]

 

[anon_xl72qcu5isp39]

Really hard hitting stuff. Weinstein is actually a current Democrat donor. And Trump isn't the first president with a "past."

 

[anon_xl72qcu5isp39]

View embedded media

Bannon, whose website has hammered Democrats for accepting Weinstein’s political donations, himself profited off a relationship with the movie mogul, in an ill-fated joint venture more than a decade ago...
***
“We are extremely honored to be in business with the new Weinstein Company,” Bannon told investors in one such call, declaring that “the Weinsteins have the most impressive track record in the film industry” and that “Bob and Harvey are two of the most prolific studio heads in the history of Hollywood.”

 

[davidallen]

Really hard hitting stuff. Weinstein is actually a current Democrat donor. And Trump isn't the first president with a "past."

Two weighty factors... well at least to you.

 

[davidallen]

Harvey was only ostracized when it became politically beneficial to do so, prior to that he was a sexual predator ...

Are you suggesting people should get ahead of the curve and ostracize DJT now instead of waiting?

 

[OKSTATE1]

Are you suggesting people should get ahead of the curve and ostracize DJT now instead of waiting?

I think everyone that is going to ostracize him has. He has more enemies then Harvey, I can promise you that. Let me know when Madonna wants to blow up Harvey's house.

I will be interested to see who gets convicted first, Harvey or Trump?

 

[MegaPoke]

Yes everyone...

You still don't understand the difference between groupies and victims.

Where are those 15 women?

 

[davidallen]

You still don't understand the difference between groupies and victims.

Where are those 15 women?

Natasha Stoynoff was groupie? I thought she was a writer just doing her job, hmmm. Interesting take there.
You will have to tell me, do groupies go to such extremes as Jessica Leeds? Are you saying she some how asked to sit next DJT on an airplane and welcomed his physical advances?


You sometimes lose your mind in trying to defend your past positions. You think the Weinstein women were victims relative to these two who were just groupies? SMH

 

[davidallen]

I think everyone that is going to ostracize him has. He has more enemies then Harvey, I can promise you that. Let me know when Madonna wants to blow up Harvey's house.

I will be interested to see who gets convicted first, Harvey or Trump?

Pretty sure Trump slips the noose - after all he is the Republican Wonder Boy!!!!

 

[MegaPoke]

Natasha Stoynoff was groupie? I thought she was a writer just doing her job, hmmm. Interesting take there.
You will have to tell me, do groupies go to such extremes as Jessica Leeds? Are you saying she some how asked to sit next DJT on an airplane and welcomed his physical advances?


You sometimes lose your mind in trying to defend your past positions. You think the Weinstein women were victims relative to these two who were just groupies? SMH

Jesus you are annoying sometimes.

Weinstein = Trump. Fine. Don't care.

 

[NZ Poke]

 

[anon_xl72qcu5isp39]

 

[NZ Poke]

 

[OKSTATE1]

All those women are under the influence of drugs and alcohol.

 

[Medic007]

I wonder if Trump's wife did stuff like this to his victims...

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/440821/hillary-clinton-women-smearing

 

[anon_xl72qcu5isp39]

I wonder if Trump's wife did stuff like this to his victims...

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/440821/hillary-clinton-women-smearing

Which one? His first one, who claims to be the first lady or the third one, who thinks she is?

 

[Medic007]

Which one? His first one, who claims to be the first lady or the third one, who thinks she is?

Any of them. Just curious if any of them intimidated and aggressively tried to silence his victims like the former first lady who just ran for president did with her husband's victims.

 

[anon_xl72qcu5isp39]

Any of them. Just curious if any of them intimidated and aggressively tried to silence his victims like the former first lady who just ran for president did with her husband's victims.

Of course not. Biff's wive$ encouraged him to get it el$ewhere, there wa$ never any preten$e of fidelity. The wive$ didn't give a $hit who he had $ex with.

 

[Medic007]

Of course not. Biff's wive$ encouraged him to get it el$ewhere, there wa$ never any preten$e of fidelity. The wive$ didn't give a $hit who he had $ex with.

So it was just the latest Democratic presidential nominee, former secretary of state, former senator, and former first lady that intimidated and tried to silence her husband's victims? Wow, what a piece of shit and terrible representative of women. Yet you Democrats love and idolize her.

 

[anon_xl72qcu5isp39]

So it was just the latest Democratic presidential nominee, former secretary of state, former senator, and former first lady that intimidated and tried to silence her husband's victims? Wow, what a piece of shit and terrible representative of women. Yet you Democrats love and idolize her.

Ah. Which takes us back to my original thesis.

1. Her detractors routinely lie so much that I dont' believe she tried to "silence" anybody without some credible proof. Ya'll always get offended when a dem actually defends themselves and hits back.

2. You don't care about representatives of women and if you did,

3. I've never talked to anybody that considers her a representative of women. Now women need a representative? To what? To whom is she a representative?

4. Democrats don't love and idolize her any more than Republicans "love and idolize" any one particular person. Reagan maybe, but he's all they've got. FDR for the dems loving and idolizing someone. Kennedy. Truman. Obama. Even Clinton maybe, but not Hillary. She won the primary popular vote by a whisker against a weak field.

5. Pick a narrative, she's either loved by the most dems, or she got the nomination against the democratic process by poltitically "fixing" the process.

6. I think this is the first and last time I've ever actually sat down and responded, point by point, to one of your parroted monologues. I wish you'd be more thoughtful with less parroting of what you hear from Hannity, et al. I've stated my opinion of her several times but for some reason you keep circling back to Hillary Clinton. It'd be like if I ripped Mitt Romney every time you addressed me.

 

[Medic007]

1. Her detractors routinely lie so much that I dont' believe she tried to "silence" anybody without some credible proof. Ya'll always get offended when a dem actually defends themselves and hits back.

You're a Democrat team player. Hillary could have beat them with a tire iron on camera and you wouldn't acknowledge it.

2. You don't care about representatives of women and if you did,

Huh?

3. I've never talked to anybody that considers her a representative of women. Now women need a representative? To what? To whom is she a representative?

Don't cluck at me. I'm nothing but the repeater of the message. Hillary was going to shatter the ultimate glass ceiling for all of womankind. Hell, Manchelle Obama just scolded all women, claiming that any woman that voted against Hillary voted against their own voice. She's one of the darlings of the left. The left has long wanted to promote women as the ultimate victim class. Women just don't buy the bullshit like the other Democrat appointed victim classes have.

She won the primary popular vote by a whisker against a weak field.

By a whisker? Did you rent or buy that enormous LeTourneau L2350 front-end wheel loader you're using to dump bullshit into this thread?

5. Pick a narrative, she's either loved by the most dems, or she got the nomination against the democratic process by poltitically "fixing" the process.

It was both. You can act like you don't know that, but I've already pointed out the enormous front-end loader you're shoveling shit with.

I've stated my opinion of her several times but for some reason you keep circling back to Hillary Clinton. It'd be like if I ripped Mitt Romney every time you addressed me.

I didn't vote for Romney. Rip him all you want. We probably have a lot of common ground on that subject.

I'm merely pointing out that yes, Biff and Billy are pigs, but the bigger pig, the fat assed disgusting slop fed HOG, was the woman who chose to victimize her husband's victims. Me pointing that out doesn't mean I think you disagree with it. You probably do agree with it, but Team Democrat doesn't allow you the freedom to express your own mind. Unaware and compliant. You do have choices even if they tell you that you don't. It's safe outside. I promise.

 

[NZ Poke]

Here's one more for anyone who else wants to learn (or has doubts about the above video):

 

[JimmyBob]

You're a Democrat team player. Hillary could have beat them with a tire iron on camera and you wouldn't acknowledge it.

Huh?

Don't cluck at me. I'm nothing but the repeater of the message. Hillary was going to shatter the ultimate glass ceiling for all of womankind. Hell, Manchelle Obama just scolded all women, claiming that any woman that voted against Hillary voted against their own voice. She's one of the darlings of the left. The left has long wanted to promote women as the ultimate victim class. Women just don't buy the bullshit like the other Democrat appointed victim classes have.

By a whisker? Did you rent or buy that enormous LeTourneau L2350 front-end wheel loader you're using to dump bullshit into this thread?

It was both. You can act like you don't know that, but I've already pointed out the enormous front-end loader you're shoveling shit with.

I didn't vote for Romney. Rip him all you want. We probably have a lot of common ground on that subject.

I'm merely pointing out that yes, Biff and Billy are pigs, but the bigger pig, the fat assed disgusting slop fed HOG, was the woman who chose to victimize her husband's victims. Me pointing that out doesn't mean I think you disagree with it. You probably do agree with it, but Team Democrat doesn't allow you the freedom to express your own mind. Unaware and compliant. You do have choices even if they tell you that you don't. It's safe outside. I promise.

Damn, too bad there's not a video of you beating this poor red-headed, rented mule, stepchild!

 

[davidallen]

So let me get this straight... NZ is defending Weinstein because you know groupies, while Medic is decrying the poor treatment of DJTs victims (as well as victims of the past).

Didn’t see that coming....