White House refuses to allow former COVID-19 adviser to testify before Congress in censorship investigation

[2012Bearcat]

White House refuses to allow former COVID-19 adviser to testify before Congress in censorship investigation - Washington Examiner

EXCLUSIVE — A former COVID-19 senior adviser in the Biden administration was forced to defy a congressional subpoena this week after the White House instructed him not to comply with it because of concerns with the rules surrounding his appearance. Andrew Slavitt, a longtime health official who...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Where are the Democrats screaming obstruction of Congress? LMAO

Biden can't have these people testify or the proof would be unquestionable and show Biden and Democrats violated the First Amendment Rights of thousands of Americans to push their authoritarian policies on the country.

 

[LAY THE WOODY]

Sundown joe doesn't want us to know now what his people knew then. By the way, where's fauchi these days?

 

[ClintonDavidScott]

White House refuses to allow former COVID-19 adviser to testify before Congress in censorship investigation - Washington Examiner

EXCLUSIVE — A former COVID-19 senior adviser in the Biden administration was forced to defy a congressional subpoena this week after the White House instructed him not to comply with it because of concerns with the rules surrounding his appearance. Andrew Slavitt, a longtime health official who...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Where are the Democrats screaming obstruction of Congress? LMAO

Biden can't have these people testify or the proof would be unquestionable and show Biden and Democrats violated the First Amendment Rights of thousands of Americans to push their authoritarian policies on the country.

Sauber cited in his letter to Slavitt’s attorney the Department of Justice’s long-held stance that Congress is obligated to allow government counsel to be present at certain depositions, a position that the Judiciary Committee disputes.

“Because of the constitutional defects with the Committee’s subpoena and consistent with its past advice, [the DOJ] has advised me of its position that Mr. Slavitt cannot be prosecuted for contempt of Congress,” Sauber wrote.



Why is the committee so afraid of government counsel being present for depositions? Awfully chickensh!t lol



carry on

 

[LAY THE WOODY]

Sauber cited in his letter to Slavitt’s attorney the Department of Justice’s long-held stance that Congress is obligated to allow government counsel to be present at certain depositions, a position that the Judiciary Committee disputes.

“Because of the constitutional defects with the Committee’s subpoena and consistent with its past advice, [the DOJ] has advised me of its position that Mr. Slavitt cannot be prosecuted for contempt of Congress,” Sauber wrote.



Why is the committee so afraid of government counsel being present for depositions? Awfully chickensh!t lol



carry on

Huge weight on sundown joe.

 

[ClintonDavidScott]

Huge weight on sundown joe.

Could be…

Or could be Jim Jordan and his ilk getting pissy cuz Democrats won’t play ball on their terms.

Turnabout’s fair play…

I know…cuz I read it so on this board…





carry on

 

[LAY THE WOODY]

Could be…

Or could be Jim Jordan and his ilk getting pissy cuz Democrats won’t play ball on their terms.

Turnabout’s fair play…

I know…cuz I read it so on this board…





carry on

Dimms empire is tumbling.

 

[2012Bearcat]

Dimms empire is tumbling.

Certainly feels like the tide is turning but as yet it remains to be seen.