ADVERTISEMENT

White House limits scope FBIs investigation allegations against Brett Kavanaugh

CSCOTTOSUPOKES said:
200.gif

giphy.gif

wedding-crashers-wtf.gif
Click to expand...

Toon, I know I am going to regret this, but I will do this anyway.
Have you ever gotten drunk? If so, can you guarantee you did not sexually assault anyone? I have, and I can guarantee that I did not sexually assault anyone. Being a stupid college student does not make a sexual assaulter. That thought simply goes towards all men are predators, which is insane. Simple as that. If that is so hard for you to comprehend, then I presume your answers to the two questions are "yes" and then "no." For that, I feel more sorry for you than I did before responding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimmyBob
blbronco said:
Toon, I know I am going to regret this, but I will do this anyway.
Have you ever gotten drunk? If so, can you guarantee you did not sexually assault anyone? I have, and I can guarantee that I did not sexually assault anyone. Being a stupid college student does not make a sexual assaulter. That thought simply goes towards all men are predators, which is insane. Simple as that. If that is so hard for you to comprehend, then I presume your answers to the two questions are "yes" and then "no." For that, I feel more sorry for you than I did before responding.
Click to expand...

Soooooo...reality and blbronco not friends got it lol
 
blbronco said:
I would adamantly disagree. Heavy drinking does not equal sexual assault. It harms his goodie goodie character, but has no bearing on sexual assault.
Click to expand...

The reasons I think it is pertinent include...

1. It shows that he committed perjury in the hearing by claiming that he never drank enough to forget what he did while drinking. He claimed that he was a guy who drank a few beers with buddies but was always in complete control. If it turns out he was consistently wasted in HS, it sheds a lot of doubt on the accuracy of his testimony. His portrayal of his HS behavior is not consistent with how Mark Judge described his own personal behavior (and that of his friends) in HS.

2. If blackout drunkenness was a common thing, it makes it possible that Ford was telling the truth, and Kav doesn’t remember what he did.
 
Ostatedchi said:
Would be pretty cool of you to dissect Ford's testimony as well.
Click to expand...

Is she up for a job on the SCOTUS?


I believe her. I don't think she was lying or embellishing.

It is possible that it wasn't him but she is certain that it was.

It is possible that it didn't happen exactly the way she described, but that is the way she remembers it happening.

Memory is fallible. There is a girl that I grew up with named Amy. We did not go to the same school, but were in the same class together at Synogogue. Our Hebrew school class was only about 20 people, and we were both in that group for over 12 years. For some reason, I have no memory of her face or interacting with her (I look at her pics on FB, and she does not even look familiar). I do remember her name, and that she was in my class, but that is it. We have mutual friends, who insist that she and I were friends and clearly remember regular interaction between the two of us. Yet, for some reason, I have no memories of her at all. I don't know why that is.

It is possible that it never happened but that she is working for the Dems to try to derail Kav, but I think this is extremely, extremely unlikely.
 
So, you are ready to basically convict a person on 36 year old accusations that are fallible with no other evidence.
 
Ostatedchi said:
That's BS and you know it.
Click to expand...

No. Convicted means that an individual is found guilty of a crime. Conviction is followed by a sentence.

Even if her memory is inaccurate, she believes that it happened. How can you blame her for saying, "there is a legitimate chance that he is going to end up on the SC, the country needs to know that he did this to me"?

It is quite possible that his memory is inaccurate and that he did it and does not remember because he was too drunk or because the memory of something so out of character for him has been repressed.

It works both ways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pokeabear
Been Jammin said:
giphy.gif
Click to expand...
Aside from guzzling a narrative, why does the FBI need to redo the Committee's work? Are we assuming Ford omitted facts or lied during her testimony? Ford had no useful information to offer during the Committee hearing. Is she suddenly going to remember everything?

You aren't normally this accepting of narratives.
 
Medic007 said:
Aside from guzzling a narrative, why does the FBI need to redo the Committee's work? Are we assuming Ford omitted facts or lied during her testimony? Ford had no useful information to offer during the Committee hearing. Is she suddenly going to remember everything?

You aren't normally this accepting of narratives.
Click to expand...

They are investigating her claims. In order to perform an investigation, they need to discuss the events (or lack thereof) with both parties, not rely on a transcript from Thursday.

Let's say they talk to Leland, PJ, Mark Judge and Squee, and something pertinent comes up. Shouldn't they then approach Ford and Kav and see if they have anything to add along those lines?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

2

How the White House Functioned With a Diminished Biden in Charge

Replies
12
Views
582
24/7 Politics
LAY THE WOODY
L
2

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/12/04/biden-white-house-pardons-00192610

Replies
12
Views
721
24/7 Politics
fairdinkem
F
OKSTATE1

The Right must be on the offensive (not the defensive) to confront identity politics

Replies
2
Views
379
24/7 Politics
OKSTATE1
OKSTATE1
DCandtheUTBand

Something fishy in TN

Replies
2
Views
290
24/7 Politics
DCandtheUTBand
DCandtheUTBand
F

The man that makes Diddy nervous - Pt. 3

Replies
0
Views
244
24/7 Politics
fairdinkem
F
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back