ADVERTISEMENT

White House limits scope FBIs investigation allegations against Brett Kavanaugh

Pokeabear

Heisman Candidate
Feb 6, 2007
9,393
2,631
113
Center-ring
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/pol...vestigation-allegations-against-brett-n915061
WASHINGTON — The White House is limiting the scope of the FBI’s investigation into the sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, multiple people briefed on the matter told NBC News.

While the FBI will examine the allegations of Christine Blasey Ford and Deborah Ramirez, the bureau has not been permitted to investigate the claims of Julie Swetnick, who has accused Kavanaugh of engaging in sexual misconduct at parties while he was a student at Georgetown Preparatory School in the 1980s, those people familiar with the investigation told NBC News. A White House official confirmed that Swetnick's claims will not be pursued as part of the reopened background investigation into Kavanaugh.



An FBI spokeswoman declined to comment, referring questions to the White House.


A White House official did not specifically dispute limitations on the scope of the FBI's investigation but denied the White House was “micromanaging” the inquiry.

White House spokesman Raj Shah said that "the scope and duration has been set by the Senate. The White House is letting the FBI agents do what they are trained to do.”

The Senate has only said that supplemental FBI background investigation “be limited to current credible allegations against the nominee and must be completed no later than one week from today.”

ANALYSISAnalysis: Kavanaugh fight shows Washington is sick. Very sick.

White House counsel Don McGahn, who has shepherded Kavanaugh's nomination since president Trump chose him for the high court on July 9, is taking the lead for the White House in dealing with the FBI on the investigation, those involved in the process told NBC News.


A U.S. official briefed on the matter said its not unusual for the White House to set the parameters of an FBI background check for a presidential nominee. The FBI had no choice but to agree to these terms, the sources told NBC News, because it is conducting the background investigation on behalf of the White House.

If the FBI learns of others who can corroborate what the existing witnesses are saying, it is not clear whether agents will be able to contact them under the terms laid out by the White House, the two sources briefed on the matter said.

Some areas are off limits, the sources said.
TRUMP WEIGHS INUnder pressure, Trump orders FBI to investigate Kavanaugh amid sex misconduct allegations
Investigators plan to meet with Mark Judge, a high school classmate and friend of Kavanaugh's whom Ford named as a witness and participant to her alleged assault.


But as of now, the FBI cannot ask the supermarket that employed Judge for records verifying when he was employed there, one of the sources was told. Ford said in congressional testimony Thursday that those records would help her narrow the time frame of the alleged incident which she recalls happening some time in the summer of 1982 in Montgomery County, Maryland.

Two sources familiar with the investigation said the FBI will also not be able to examine why Kavanaugh’s account of his drinking at Yale University differs from those of some former classmates, who have said he was known as a heavy drinker. Those details may be pertinent to investigating claims from Ramirez who described an alleged incident of sexual misconduct she said occurred while Kavanaugh was inebriated. Ramirez's lawyer said Saturday that she had been contacted by the FBI and would cooperate.

The conditions under which the FBI's reopened background check are occurring appears to differ from the one envisioned by Flake, who used his leverage as a swing vote to pressure the Trump administration to order the FBI investigation.

Flake said Friday he thought the FBI should decide the scope of the investigation.


“They’ll have to decide — the FBI you know, how far that goes,” he told reporters. “This is limited in time and scope and I think that it's appropriate when it's a lifetime appointment and allegations this serious and we ought to let people know that we're serious about it.”

Update:
 
Last edited:
I will go on record as actually being ok with this. The request was made to investigate the Ford accusations. There is no reason to go on a wild goose hunt. They have limited time, limit it to the accusation that received congressional hearings. Wanting more wide-spanning is an open admission that this investigation was nothing more than a stall tactic. I am also legitimately curious as to what comes of this investigation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
I will go on record as actually being ok with this. The request was made to investigate the Ford accusations. There is no reason to go on a wild goose hunt. They have limited time, limit it to the accusation that received congressional hearings. Wanting more wide-spanning is an open admission that this investigation was nothing more than a stall tactic. I am also legitimately curious as to what comes of this investigation.
Nope if you read the article to the bottom, Flake requested the FBI set the scope, not the Whitehouse. What are they scared of? Maybe Feorgetown prep has some dark secrets in their closest. Hell Kav even said “What happens at Georgetown Prep stays at Georgetown Prep.” I guess we’ll see if that axiom holds true.
 
What are they afraid of? I don't know, an investigation that starts out with Ford's complaint, then balloons into he may have given a stern look to a puppy, to he did not feed a stray kitten....so on and so forth.

I am fine with a limited scope to the complaint at hand. Anything more is an open admission that this is nothing but a stall tactic. If that is the case, it is a complete slap in the face to real victims and increases the lack of faith in the FBI, congress, etc. I know you troll a lot and love the anarchy to this (and I will admit a slight bit of pleasure watching how low both sides are willing to go...which has even surprised me), but this is one of the very few smart White House moves.
 
What are they afraid of? I don't know, an investigation that starts out with Ford's complaint, then balloons into he may have given a stern look to a puppy, to he did not feed a stray kitten....so on and so forth.

I am fine with a limited scope to the complaint at hand. Anything more is an open admission that this is nothing but a stall tactic. If that is the case, it is a complete slap in the face to real victims and increases the lack of faith in the FBI, congress, etc. I know you troll a lot and love the anarchy to this (and I will admit a slight bit of pleasure watching how low both sides are willing to go...which has even surprised me), but this is one of the very few smart White House moves.
It’s not what the Senator from Arizona asked for. It will be interesting to see if this is yet another foot on this centipede of a Whitehouse they are gonna shoot.
 
Swetnick's claims are the least realistic/believable of the 3. I think it is much more likely that she is delusional or a liar than it is that her story has a shred of reality.
 
Nope if you read the article to the bottom, Flake requested the FBI set the scope, not the Whitehouse. What are they scared of? Maybe Feorgetown prep has some dark secrets in their closest. Hell Kav even said “What happens at Georgetown Prep stays at Georgetown Prep.” I guess we’ll see if that axiom holds true.
What is the White House scared of? Hmmmm I wonder. The lead investigator on this is probably the bisexual third in the page Strozk ménage a trois . You think the White House has a hard on for the fbi to do this thing? Get real boof!!
 
It’s not what the Senator from Arizona asked for. It will be interesting to see if this is yet another foot on this centipede of a Whitehouse they are gonna shoot.

The Senator from AZ can also ask for a unicorn for his daughter but doesn't mean he's going to get it.
 
You don’t get it do you? Flake has the leverage. Whether or not he decides to use it is up to him.

I think Flake is just looking for an excuse to go thumbs up. As things stand currently, he can come off as a hero, who stood up to the GOP, without being a traitor. He will say, “the FBI investigated, and didn’t find anything definitive. Kav deserves the presumption of innocence”.
 
I think Flake is just looking for an excuse to go thumbs up. As things stand currently, he can come off as a hero, who stood up to the GOP, without being a traitor. He will say, “the FBI investigated, and didn’t find anything definitive. Kav deserves the presumption of innocence”.
Oh I totally agree, he is no idiot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Been Jammin

If he drank at Yale, even if he drank a LOT, it has no bearing on what he is being accused of. Essentially, you want this to be so drawn out that it investigates if he every said the "F" word. Drinking at Yale does not equal sexual assault before he was even at Yale. So, you just want this drawn out, nothing more. You hate real rape victims as much as you hate the GOP (though, I cannot fault you for the second part of that....the first part, I can fault you). You kick puppies and kittens.
 
If he drank at Yale, even if he drank a LOT, it has no bearing on what he is being accused of. Essentially, you want this to be so drawn out that it investigates if he every said the "F" word. Drinking at Yale does not equal sexual assault before he was even at Yale. So, you just want this drawn out, nothing more. You hate real rape victims as much as you hate the GOP (though, I cannot fault you for the second part of that....the first part, I can fault you). You kick puppies and kittens.
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!






Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
 
It’s not what the Senator from Arizona asked for. It will be interesting to see if this is yet another foot on this centipede of a Whitehouse they are gonna shoot.
It's a shame that Feinstein sat on the letter for 6 weeks before leaking it to the press. Pretty irresponsible on her part. No need to drag out something that could have already been completed if she had acted ethically and responsibly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: okstatefan1
It's a shame that Feinstein sat on the letter for 6 weeks before leaking it to the press. Pretty irresponsible on her part. No need to drag out something that could have already been completed if she had acted ethically and responsibly.
I think the news outlet said it wasn’t her and Orrin Hatch acknowledged that.
 
It's a shame that Feinstein sat on the letter for 6 weeks before leaking it to the press. Pretty irresponsible on her part. No need to drag out something that could have already been completed if she had acted ethically and responsibly.

What did you think of Republicans withholding Kavanaugh documents from Dems until it was right before the hearing?

Did they act ethically and responsibly???
 
If he drank at Yale, even if he drank a LOT, it has no bearing on what he is being accused of. Essentially, you want this to be so drawn out that it investigates if he every said the "F" word. Drinking at Yale does not equal sexual assault before he was even at Yale. So, you just want this drawn out, nothing more. You hate real rape victims as much as you hate the GOP (though, I cannot fault you for the second part of that....the first part, I can fault you). You kick puppies and kittens.

IMO, heavy drinking at Yale is pertinent to the claim by Ramirez.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pokeabear
I would adamantly disagree. Heavy drinking does not equal sexual assault. It harms his goodie goodie character, but has no bearing on sexual assault.

200.gif

giphy.gif

wedding-crashers-wtf.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pokeabear
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT