What if any consequence will the corporate media face
- Thread starter MegaPoke
- Start date
And they whine about being called fake news. If the shoe fits...
They have followers, some on this forum, who are still true believers and always will be. You could smash them in the side of the head will a nail embedded 2 x 4 to let fresh air in and they would still be believers.
So Barr is covering up for mueller or are they in on it together? Please walk us through.
As I understand it, the theory would go....
Mueller’s report neither indicted or exonerated Trump on obstruction of justice allegations. Stated explicitly by Barr’s summary.
So Barr is covering up potential evidence of obstruction by not making the entire report fully public.
Personally, I still want to see Mueller’s full report in it’s entirety so I can make my own calls before opining on what it does or doesn’t do.
I’m a cynical, mistrustful SOB like that though.
But the old adage of being able to indict a ham sandwich should apply here right? Especially a ham sandwich up against 3000 subpoenas and 500 witnesses, 2 years and ten million dollars stacked against it.
There should be no intellectual wiggle room here. If trump turned without his blinker there would be have been ticket written.
The alternative is trump is a criminal master mind who evaded justice from a special counsel whose entire existence was to get him.
Actually, no. Start educating yourself. I’m not gonna be around much longer to do it for you.
There is a whole theory of law...and a DOJ admin rule...that a sitting President CAN’T be criminally indicted. Your Trump guys in the twitterspere have been trumpeting that for approximately two years.
Try to keep up.
I really love your new found complete trust in the DOJ and the AG.
Not consistent, but very cute.
Not consistent, but very cute.
And before you go your usual route of trying to paint my statements as a belief that Trump did something wrong and indictable despite recent reports, I will refer you to a prior statement above that I want to see the full report made public so I can read it myself before opining about what it does or doesn’t do.
The fbi has been one of the most corrupt organizations since its inception. How’s that for consistent? The doj is as corrupt as the people making the decisions. How’s that for consistent?
Is that my usual route? It could be I guess, but I imagine you are about to go the “no time, no desire” route before some of my former posts are quoted to back that up.
I’m sorry I’m just a lowly lay person. Can a sitting president be indicted? Type slow oh pompous one.
And yet you’re now relying fully upon statements of the DOJ and Barr.
Inconsistent.
Like I said, educate yourself.
Draw your own conclusions. People disagree.
There is a DOJ regulation that says no.
Mueller did his investigation under those regulations.
That’s at least one good explanation....other than the one posited by you (indict a ham sandwich...intellectual integrity...blah, blah, blah)....for why Mueller didn’t indict Trump.
If is your usual route.
Again, educate yourself.
I’m not gonna spoonfeed you your own quotes. Presumably, you typed them.
Here’s one of you characterizing me as a closet looney liberal by comparing me to Up.
You’re welcome.
And that’s 4 in a row to meet your 4 in a row.
Maybe some context for you. I and everyone on the left and right before this weekend believed the special counsel would do whatever they could to get trump on anything he did wrong. If your alternative theory is that trump has turned the special counsel into a pro trump organization that allowed him to get away with treason and obstruction, his campaign and his family of those as well it’s certainly possible.
That would put you in the crowd with Rosie O’Donnell, cnn and msnbc. Certainly possible of course.
Lol what? I think the characterization was loony, but not liberal. I don’t think you are a liberal. You hate trump personally just like Bill Krystal and others and your voting action gives liberals the gift of your indirect support.
I thought it was stated by Mueller that his indecision on not charging Trump was NOT based on the perception that a president can't be indicted.
Skimmed. I have to say picking an AG that has publicly opinionated on your investigation is almost as bad as your spouse chatting with an AG on an airplane.
Hahahahahahaha! I'd ask what you think Barr was wrong about, but clearly that's a useless endeavor. You don't even have a clue what Barr's opinion actually was. Once again, wake me up when Barr was found to have met with Mrs. Trump on a tarmac.
OMG!!! While a special counsel not involving Barr was on-going? Say it isn't so!
Similar threads
