ADVERTISEMENT

Week 3: Synposis of all the winning

I see. The Trump legacy started and stopped with the election. Interesting take.

You see nothing. He's been in office less than 25 days. You gonna write his legacy in that timeframe, and post "adult" potshots?
 
  1. Mark Cuban sucks and isn't smart enough to run for let alone be POTUS.
  2. Judges are dunces - loosers - who hate 'Merica.
  3. Nordy'ssucks.
  4. Flynn is expendable.
  5. Abe had no idea how to handle such Yuge hands - just watch the tape.
  6. SNL - so mean.
  7. Mar-a-Lago - most secure place everrrrr to formulate foreign policy.
  8. Huge crowds any where DJT goes - did you see that crowd at the Inauguration- Bigly - biglyest ever.
  9. SEE YOU IN COURT - said to people who spend everyday in court - you know sitting up front- on the bench.
  10. McCain - losing so long he doesn't know how to win - loser quoting generals who say we lost in mission - looser.
  11. Gorsuch - need I say more.
  12. Maps and graphics - one on page please...
Much more winning I am sure... so much winning.

I can't even keep up. Kudos for a nice summary .

sY3s6.gif


Apparently Flynn has been flat exposed as a bald faced liar - if the NSA didn't have the transcripts nobody would care. He whipped that flag and reeeeally was going to restore some ass kicking to our foreign policy. And another conservative is exposed as a say-anything-to-accumulate-power, liar, but that's okay. Just watch.
 
Glove, honest question: What are the chances that Biff reduces military spending? He's going after the military industrial complex - I would think not spending so much money on defense is kind of the obvious move.
I don't see a reduction happening because I think Biff is committed to the idea of making the US the all mighty military machine it was once seen as. If reduction was his plan I think he would have looked to have a traditional civilian head the Dept of Defense, someone averse to projecting too much power in these days of diplomacy matters. I honestly see deficit spending looming for the military machine.
 
I don't see a reduction happening because I think Biff is committed to the idea of making the US the all mighty military machine it was once seen as. If reduction was his plan I think he would have looked to have a traditional civilian head the Dept of Defense, someone averse to projecting too much power in these days of diplomacy matters. I honestly see deficit spending looming for the military machine.

I don't see a reduction in spending either, but increasing spending certainly runs counter to the he's battling the military industrial complex narrative a bit don't you think? Those aren't internally consistent positions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
I don't see a reduction in spending either, but increasing spending certainly runs counter to the he's battling the military industrial complex narrative a bit don't you think? Those aren't internally consistent positions.
I guess I'm not in the camp of Trump battling the military industrial complex narrative. I think his ego will supercede any manufactured political stuff regarding whatever this military industrial complex is. He likes things shiny and YUGE and the BEST EVER.
 
I don't see a reduction in spending either, but increasing spending certainly runs counter to the he's battling the military industrial complex narrative a bit don't you think? Those aren't internally consistent positions.
I guess if he can negotiate down the price of everything then he can get more for less and show how #winning really works!
 
Glove, honest question: What are the chances that Biff reduces military spending? He's going after the military industrial complex - I would think not spending so much money on defense is kind of the obvious move.
Did he ever say that he was going to cut defense spending? I think it's a bad time to cut defense spending unfortunately. We need to reign in our foreign misadventures but update our military, particularly our navy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT