I'm glad you stopped in. Adult conversation can be hard to find some days.
Yes, your op just oozes adult conversation. By the way 306 to 232 is the only winning that really matters. Live with it.
I'm glad you stopped in. Adult conversation can be hard to find some days.
I see. The Trump legacy started and stopped with the election. Interesting take.Yes, your op just oozes adult conversation. By the way 306 to 232 is the only winning that really matters. Live with it.
I see. The Trump legacy started and stopped with the election. Interesting take.
Much more winning I am sure... so much winning.
- Mark Cuban sucks and isn't smart enough to run for let alone be POTUS.
- Judges are dunces - loosers - who hate 'Merica.
- Nordy'ssucks.
- Flynn is expendable.
- Abe had no idea how to handle such Yuge hands - just watch the tape.
- SNL - so mean.
- Mar-a-Lago - most secure place everrrrr to formulate foreign policy.
- Huge crowds any where DJT goes - did you see that crowd at the Inauguration- Bigly - biglyest ever.
- SEE YOU IN COURT - said to people who spend everyday in court - you know sitting up front- on the bench.
- McCain - losing so long he doesn't know how to win - loser quoting generals who say we lost in mission - looser.
- Gorsuch - need I say more.
- Maps and graphics - one on page please...
Week 4 candidate for winning list:
I don't see a reduction happening because I think Biff is committed to the idea of making the US the all mighty military machine it was once seen as. If reduction was his plan I think he would have looked to have a traditional civilian head the Dept of Defense, someone averse to projecting too much power in these days of diplomacy matters. I honestly see deficit spending looming for the military machine.Glove, honest question: What are the chances that Biff reduces military spending? He's going after the military industrial complex - I would think not spending so much money on defense is kind of the obvious move.
I don't see a reduction happening because I think Biff is committed to the idea of making the US the all mighty military machine it was once seen as. If reduction was his plan I think he would have looked to have a traditional civilian head the Dept of Defense, someone averse to projecting too much power in these days of diplomacy matters. I honestly see deficit spending looming for the military machine.
I guess I'm not in the camp of Trump battling the military industrial complex narrative. I think his ego will supercede any manufactured political stuff regarding whatever this military industrial complex is. He likes things shiny and YUGE and the BEST EVER.I don't see a reduction in spending either, but increasing spending certainly runs counter to the he's battling the military industrial complex narrative a bit don't you think? Those aren't internally consistent positions.
I guess if he can negotiate down the price of everything then he can get more for less and show how #winning really works!I don't see a reduction in spending either, but increasing spending certainly runs counter to the he's battling the military industrial complex narrative a bit don't you think? Those aren't internally consistent positions.
Did he ever say that he was going to cut defense spending? I think it's a bad time to cut defense spending unfortunately. We need to reign in our foreign misadventures but update our military, particularly our navy.Glove, honest question: What are the chances that Biff reduces military spending? He's going after the military industrial complex - I would think not spending so much money on defense is kind of the obvious move.
I guess if he can negotiate down the price of everything then he can get more for less and show how #winning really works!