original.antiwar.com
It's hilarious that you use the "first they came for the unionist, then the Jews, etc... Your posting history indicates you'd be more than delighted if they came to get all the Jews. Your selectivity is so lame and transparent.Perilous Times for Personal Liberty - Antiwar.com
"First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out – Because I was not a socialist.| Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out – Because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not…
You are not alone in your attitude. Most of MAGA cheers alongside you. You can think of nothing better than having the government zealously enforcing laws, even ones that don’t exist. No, no police state tactic there!
Like Democrats, you ignore the laws you do not like. I know it bothers you that people can not immigrate to our country and promote terrorism but the law is the law and is now brinng enforced.
Which of the two being discussed promoted terrorism? Which of the two were charged with promoting terrorism? Answer: neither one! What the Trump administration has done to those two is straight out of the police state handbook, chapter one. It comes as no surprise you will defend it right up to the time a Democrat disappears you for violating one of its unspoken laws. When that happens the light will flash in your eyes and you’ll think “oh, that’s what Dan tried to warn me would happen.”
Like I said you ignore everything you do not like. The US government has designated Hamas a terrorist group. The two you are referencing have supported and promoted Hamas, hence the promotion of terrorism. You knw this is against the law but because you also support the terrorist you try to ignore the law.
Why have neither one of them been charged with supporting Hamas. What do you know that no one else knows? Please advise.
Green card holder does not have to be charged with a crime to be deported. You've been told this numerous times. Maybe read up on the law and get back to us when you know what you are talking about.
Not only this, but they can backdate a green card denial based on facts that are not known or even that were concealed during the approval process would have led to denial of the green card in the first place. In other words, the administration is allowed to take his terrorist activities during the application review into account and effectively issue a retroactive denial.
Which one of those items you ticked off: national security concerns, fraud, violating immigration laws has the government accused them of violating? Tell us what you know.
Please point to a single time I’ve sided with a Jew-hating terrorist. Find one. Please.
It occurs to me how you’ve come by your notion about me siding with Jew hating terrorists. I have made no secret of my disgust with the political ideology that is Zionism. I hate Zionism. You conclude since Zionism is an ideology directly connected to Jews I must therefore hate Jews. One can’t hate Zionism unless one hates Jews. A Zionist and a Jew are the same thing. Has it occurred to you that there are far more Christian Zionists than Jewish Zionists? That being the case shouldn’t you really be accusing me of hating Christians, not Jews?
Been hearing this “come for me” tripe for decades. The fallacy is that the ones who are likely to “come for me” are the socialists, communists, collectivists, illegal aliens, moslems, and the gamut of leftist weirdos.Perilous Times for Personal Liberty - Antiwar.com
"First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out – Because I was not a socialist.| Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out – Because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not…
There's no doubt about what you wrote. Are you aware that MAGA belongs in the "collectivist" category of your list?
The Irish republic rejected Catholicism a few years ago when it enshrined the right to abortion in its constitution. This tells me that that conflict was never about Catholicism. It was about Marxist psychopaths planting bombs.
Yep, doing [P-DAN] math, this is clearly less than 50%.The people spoke. Out of 75 million that voted for Kvntmala and that turd Walz about 30 million were likely illegals.
[P-DAN], what exactly is it that you have against "Make America Great Again"? Also, do you own a safe?
It means nothing because it means everything on the day DJT thinks of something new. For example, not a single person on this board had ever given a single thought about wanting to conquer Greenland, Canada or Panama. Trump mentions it and suddenly the lot of you hate Canada and Canadians and insist you’ve always felt that way, you just didn’t say anything until DJT brought it up. MAGA means something different every day. I challenge you to give a detailed logical explanation of what it means and follow it with details of how Trump is going to achieve what MAGA means to you. IMO most MAGA acolytes love MAGA for one reason only: Trump makes leftists crazy.
How bout the "Gulf of America" ? I've got to find an " Trump acolyte" cap. Thanks Dan! 🖕
You’re the perfect MAGA acolyte, Woody. Can you describe/define MAGA, explain its objective and its method of achieving it?
MAGA means what you want it to mean to you, while it means what Woody wants it to mean to Woody. I sure there’s a ton of overlap, but I bet we’d get 100 different answers from 100 different people who were asked to explain what it is. The one thing that would be on every list would be their joy in watching Trump make leftists lose their composure. Which is delightful! Who doesn’t love to see that? But there needs to be more than a mercurial personality that flits from one issue to another without telling us what the plan is.
No, Woody, it doesn’t. I’m sorry if I put you on the spot asking you to explain MAGA.
Yer weeps against MAGA and support of terrorism? Yer yer own punching bag Dan. This board is a small part of yer misery. Don't forget yer fiber.
