ADVERTISEMENT

Warren proposes 'Wealth Tax'

Don’t like it and agree with the difficulty of equitably enforcing it.

I do agree with her in general on the idea of “trust busting” monopolies.
 
I wonder what will happen??

Everyone is just going to stay put in this country, not hide their wealth and pay it happily I’m sure.
 
How would this apply to corporate wealth and non-liquid assets (such as CEO stock options)?
 
I invoke Hauser's Law - the proposition that, in the United States, federal tax revenues since World War II have always been approximately equal to 19.5% of GDP, regardless of wide fluctuations in the marginal tax rate.

So, the question really becomes - are higher taxes on the wealthy going to negatively impact the GDP, than how much of it they can capture.

Pretty obvious to me that the wealthy will seek tax shelters, move their interests out of country etc. - taking their money out of US banks and the American economy. How is that a good thing?

Figures that Liawatha is pitching this class warfare bullshit. We need to focus on bringing back the American middle class.
 
So, who benefits from this wealth redistribution and why? Illegal immigrants? Taxpayer funded abortions? Gender "reassignment" operations? Liberal colleges? Expanding the government in to more rules and laws and intruding more in to our privacy? Widening welfare benefits? When the libs propose to take more of someone's money, what lib programs are they going to spend it on?

Mega addressed the front side of this issue, but what does the backside look like?
 
So, who benefits from this wealth redistribution and why? Illegal immigrants? Taxpayer funded abortions? Gender "reassignment" operations? Liberal colleges? Expanding the government in to more rules and laws and intruding more in to our privacy? Widening welfare benefits? When the libs propose to take more of someone's money, what lib programs are they going to spend it on?

Mega addressed the front side of this issue, but what does the backside look like?
1% goes to late term abortions, the other 1% goes to putting tits on chicks with dicks and 1% is specifically to make sure your grandkids don't respond to your facebook messages.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Syskatine
I'd support this program if its enactment was not simply an excuse to expand government further. The story says 2.75T over 10 years in additional new taxes (of course not counting the tax shelters, dodges, and other mechanisms the wealthy will use to avoid it). That's $275B per year. Not even enough to balance our current federal budget much less actually support government expansion.
 
Oklahoma’s Own—-

First Female President??!!!



Download-File
 
Girls always good at math..

Low IQ Donald getting schooled by Nancy and Co.

GettyImages-836314424.jpg
 
Last edited:
This is all bs the only "fair" way is a straight percentage. Very simple you make more you pay more....
 
  • Like
Reactions: cableok
$50 millionaires don’t give a fick about me, but neither does Elizabeth Warren. I say take the proceeds (won’t be what’s projected) and reduce payroll taxes on employees. It’s revenue neutral.
 
Rich and poor are alike in this.
Although I am sure it is true, not too many taxes that effect the poor but not the rich. Unfortunately, way too many people believe the line about “tax breaks for the rich”. Or the “rich don’t pay for their fair share”. Or they have such a misunderstanding about the tax code they have no idea.

It is just simple to believe the rich are the boogeyman and that works for politicians to use the boogeyman for political gain ... even when it is grossly unfair.
The top 1% already pay nearly 46% of all taxes paid (CNBC 2015 article). The top 10% pay nearly 70% of all taxes paid. They already way overindex in taxes paid, but the victimization culture of America allows politicians to make it seem like that is not enough.
 
Last edited:
Although I am sure it is true, not too many taxes that effect the poor but not the rich. Unfortunately, way too many people believe the line about “tax breaks for the rich”. Or the “rich don’t pay for their fair share”. Or they have such a misunderstanding about the tax code they have no idea.

It is just simple to believe the rich are the boogeyman and that works for politicians to use the boogeyman for political gain ... even when it is grossly unfair.
The top 1% already pay nearly 46% of all taxes paid (CNBC 2015 article). The top 10% pay nearly 70% of all taxes paid. The already way overindex in taxes, but the victimization culture of America allows politicians to make it seem like that is not enough.
The rich will continue to pay even more as the wealth gaps increases.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT