ADVERTISEMENT

Wal-Mart

Exactly what laws could he break to prevent them from occurring?

I'm with you on the subsiding to prevent them. I give money to adoption services and homes for children now. I'm assuming that since you are willing to, that you already do as well.

Yes I do in fact.

Just forget the laws thing. I deleted it. He's such an embecile he'd go do something stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bitter Creek
Can you not look at the overall employment numbers and at least feign some glee that more of your fellow Americans are working now than were working under the president of the previous 8 years? And just man up and admit that your boy had nothing to do with it.
I guess you missed where I said this was a good thing.

Why must this be an exclusive win for Trump for you to be happy?

While your answering questions, can you explain this graph?

4A07856B-F880-4EC3-9764-B7DAA16D9484_w1023_r1_s.png
 
http://www.businessinsider.com/walmart-suddenly-closes-sams-club-stores-2018-1

“In some cases, employees were not informed of the closures prior to showing up to work on Thursday.

Instead, they learned that their store would be closing when they found the store's doors locked and a notice announcing the closure, according to reports.
Good grief! Do you not understand that closing unprofitable stores or operations is essential to keeping a company competitive and able to pay wages and benefits that are competitive to the majority of employees that work at profitable stores and divisions of a company?

I swear the economic stupidity of the left astounds me.

No business wants to close anything but there comes a point in time where you realize you are throwing good money after bad. Would you rather they bankrupt themselves just for the sake of giving the minority of their employees employment? Then everyone is screwed.
 
Good grief! Do you not understand that closing unprofitable stores or operations is essential to keeping a company competitive and able to pay wages and benefits that are competitive to the majority of employees that work at profitable stores and divisions of a company?

I swear the economic stupidity of the left astounds me.

No business wants to close anything but there comes a point in time where you realize you are throwing good money after bad. Would you rather they bankrupt themselves just for the sake of giving the minority of their employees employment? Then everyone is screwed.
The obsequious Trumpets are what astound me...
 
The obsequious Trumpets are what astound me...
Once again you can't argue the merits so you attack the messenger. Walmart gave very sound economic reasons for the closings but you are incapable of making a reasoned argument against it so you attack on a moronic personal level.

I'd respect an economic argument of how Walmart's decision is wrong but no we get the standard "Trumpets" comment. You make it so easy to dismiss you, step it up or go home.
 
Once again you can't argue the merits so you attack the messenger. Walmart gave very sound economic reasons for the closings but you are incapable of making a reasoned argument against it so you attack on a moronic personal level.

I'd respect an economic argument of how Walmart's decision is wrong but no we get the standard "Trumpets" comment. You make it so easy to dismiss you, step it up or go home.
Umm who said Wal-Mart was wrong?
 
Umm who said Wal-Mart was wrong?
So you agree with Walmart but me saying "the economic stupidity of the left astounds me" is a trigger for you to do an adhominem personal attack.

The weak minded can't debate so they attack on a personal level.
 
So you agree with Walmart but me saying "the economic stupidity of the left astounds me" is a trigger for you to do an adhominem personal attack.

The weak minded can't debate so they attack on a personal level.
So you think that was aimed at you? Interesting.
 
Good grief! Do you not understand that closing unprofitable stores or operations is essential to keeping a company competitive and able to pay wages and benefits that are competitive to the majority of employees that work at profitable stores and divisions of a company?

I swear the economic stupidity of the left astounds me.

No business wants to close anything but there comes a point in time where you realize you are throwing good money after bad. Would you rather they bankrupt themselves just for the sake of giving the minority of their employees employment? Then everyone is screwed.

He and I had this exact argument about AT&T in one of the other threads. He decided I needed scolding for insinuating that there were any economic situations in which he was not very well versed and that he understood it all extremely well. Which, oddly enough, was in stark contrast to his remarks about the AT&T layoffs.
 
Do yourselves a favor and don't google "circle jerk memes or images" which is the insult that seems to show up here so often by the lefties, you know who I'm talking about.

Sorry that I did. It is the most degenerate images you can imagine. I now know the mentality of a person who would use that as a pejorative. They are sick.
 
Obama said GW Bush's 4 trillion deficit was un-American then he proceeded to rack up 9 trillion in deficit. More than all Presidents COMBINED.

Defend that snowflake.

Deficits decreased by two-thirds of what they were when Bush left lol.

Carry on.
 
Deficits decreased by two-thirds of what they were when Bush left lol.

Carry on.
I'll never defend Bush on deficits but tell me how the national debt goes from 9 trillion to 20 trillion is decreased by 2/3's?

You are doing the liberal bate and switch, because one year of Bush's deficit was huge, the financial melt down, then you compare that at the end of Obama's Presidency his last annual deficit was 2/3's less than Bush's last horrible year. It's a freaking joke.

Bush 4 trillion, Obama 9 trillion.
 
Deficits decreased by two-thirds of what they were when Bush left lol.

Carry on.
Lol. Too bad facts always get in your way Clintoon.

A one time stimulus package by Obama drastically drove up the deficit in FY 2009. Obama added $787 billion to the Bush FY 2009 budget deficit with his "shovel ready jobs" stimulus package. So most of that large deficit in FY 2009 actually falls on Obama. The deficit in FY 2008 was $458 billion in comparison. That claim by Obama that you referenced was just another lie by the inept community organizer in chief.

Obama had the highest deficits and added more to the national debt than any other president ever. You can try to pretend your Kenyan donkey herder was something special, but those of us with a brain know better. The dude was an idiot that wore mom jeans.

https://www.thebalance.com/deficit-by-president-what-budget-deficits-hide-3306151
 
Lol. Too bad facts always get in your way Clintoon.

A one time stimulus package by Obama drastically drove up the deficit in FY 2009. Obama added $787 billion to the Bush FY 2009 budget deficit with his "shovel ready jobs" stimulus package. So most of that large deficit in FY 2009 actually falls on Obama. The deficit in FY 2008 was $458 billion in comparison. That claim by Obama that you referenced was just another lie by the inept community organizer in chief.

Obama had the highest deficits and added more to the national debt than any other president ever. You can try to pretend your Kenyan donkey herder was something special, but those of us with a brain know better. The dude was an idiot that wore mom jeans.

https://www.thebalance.com/deficit-by-president-what-budget-deficits-hide-3306151

Weird how the same website can paint a different picture lol...

https://www.thebalance.com/national-debt-under-obama-3306293

Carry on.
 
"First, it's important to note that the deficit swelled in 2009 (hence the steady drop). In 2008, the deficit was $458 billion, or 3.1 percent of GDP. Those deficits are smaller than the ones the country is facing today. The 2009 fiscal year represented a huge jump in the deficit, partly because of the massive stimulus program to jumpstart the cratering economy."

Lol. Carry on.
 
"First, it's important to note that the deficit swelled in 2009 (hence the steady drop). In 2008, the deficit was $458 billion, or 3.1 percent of GDP. Those deficits are smaller than the ones the country is facing today. The 2009 fiscal year represented a huge jump in the deficit, partly because of the massive stimulus program to jumpstart the cratering economy."

Lol. Carry on.

You should footnote all of your posts this way. It's catchy.
 
Does this count as an ad hominem?
No! Making commentary on a political group or ideology is totally different than attacking an individual with stupid personal adhominem attacks. Once again you lefty ignoramus's don't know what the hell you are talking about.

That is adhominem attack. Just so you know.
 
No! Making commentary on a political group or ideology is totally different than attacking an individual with stupid personal adhominem attacks. Once again you lefty ignoramus's don't know what the hell you are talking about.

That is adhominem attack. Just so you know.
Ummm so you are one of the Trumpets I was referring to?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT