ADVERTISEMENT

Wait....what?

schumer introduced the bill in the 1990's....he was just on the bus when they proposed to end it and the house ignoring it. Trying to insure diversity is not the intention of immigration. It's shumers bill, no doubt. Just wanted to tell the whole story...or more of it. Now it's not so interesting...or maybe it is!
 
chisolm-homogenisation-kalergi-plan.jpg
 
Been, people from your team won't touch your argument. That should tell you something.
 
The Republican controlled House never bothered to hear it.
The conservatives in the House saw nothing but "amnesty" for existing illegal immigrants and the provision for agricultural visas for "low skill immigrants" and didn't bother with the rest of the details before saying no to it. Nevermind that the bill also addressed border security and ended the visa lottery in favor of a merit based system.

I thought it was a great start to immigration reform myself. But here it is in the year 2017 and the shitbirds in Congress still can't get shit done.
 
Been, the title of this thread just makes me think of this every time I see it.

giphy.gif
 
And..."I'm not on the Been train re: his OP."

Your the only person that doesn't see the stupid. I guess it's like a smell you get used to, your house smells like farts, but their yours and constant so it becomes part of you.
 
And..."I'm not on the Been train re: his OP."

Your the only person that doesn't see the stupid. I guess it's like a smell you get used to, your house smells like farts, but their yours and constant so it becomes part of you.

Your reading comprehension really sucks. I'm a bit worried for you.
 
There is no reason for this thread to exist in the first place.

You're the only one that can't see that.
 
Just like the travel ban was lip service and accomplished nothing. Remember all the time wasted on the travel ban? Time wasted by the POTUS and the White House. Time wasted by the courts deciding if it was constitutional and should be upheld or overturned

Have you ever read the federal law in question on this topic? It’s one of the more straightforward laws I’ve ever read:
(f)Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

Not sure how it’s such a time waster. That law was passed in the 1950s. When a Democrat president used his authority per that statute, all is well. But when Trump uses it, OH MY GOD WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE !!!!!
 
This was a ridiculous thread from the jump.

How you blame a guy that's been saying this is a problem and was fought by every lib with a mic over the subject is mind bottling.

Exactly this.

That the nuances of the politics on this topic need to be delved into is quackery at best. Quackery.

No political points are to be gained (from this thread), only a spreading around of the quackery.
 
Last edited:
Been, people from your team won't touch your argument. That should tell you something.
JD is not from my team. Just ask him.

I'm on the edge of my chair and hitting refresh every 30 seconds as I wait for Sys and DavidAllen to jump in this foxhole with me.

For the record, I am definitely not on Been's team.

I posted what I posted because it's been a popular pastime by some here to suggest I am despite all evidence to the contrary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
Have you ever read the federal law in question on this topic? It’s one of the more straightforward laws I’ve ever read:


Not sure how it’s such a time waster. That law was passed in the 1950s. When a Democrat president used his authority per that statute, all is well. But when Trump uses it, OH MY GOD WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE !!!!!

There is another specific statute that restricts that authority somewhat.

We discussed this during the first ban. I'm waiting to pick up my daughter from work so I can't cite it right now.

Plus...I don't care enough to look it up again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
There is another specific statute that restricts that authority somewhat.

We discussed this during the first ban. I'm waiting to pick up my daughter from work so I can't cite it right now.

Plus...I don't care enough to look it up again.
Haha. OK. Bonus points for honesty!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
Suprise suprise suprise... another made up quote by NZPoke....
I'm actually surprised everyone hasn't put NZ on ignore. I'm not a fan of ignore simply because I like to read opposing views. Even if I respond with the usual sarcastic bullshit, I still like the provocation of thought that opposing views bring. But NZ isn't thought provoking.

He's the proverbial Muppet. He follows a script. He regurgitates ridiculous shit. I took him off ignore for half a day and I saw that his current posts were just repeats of the same shit I put him on ignore for. There's nothing to his posts but the same shit, different day.

You all can keep responding to his spam, but ignoring him en masse will reduce him to zero audience regardless of his posts. It only takes one to feed him. For me, it was learning that one of our message board community was Jewish and I pulled the ignore trigger. I get the whole "but somebody should oppose him" argument, but I can assure you that he feeds from dissent, and it only takes one to fill his tank. If everyone here ignored him, he'd go away, or at least you'd not have to read his bullshit when he posted it and waste your time responding.

/soapbox
 
JD is not from my team. Just ask him.

I'm on the edge of my chair and hitting refresh every 30 seconds as I wait for Sys and DavidAllen to jump in this foxhole with me.

JD likes going against whoever is in power

Sys in foxhole with you... sounds weird

David A in a Foxhole with you, I think he is phobic
 
  • Like
Reactions: CowboyJD
JD likes going against whoever is in power

Fairly accurate.

I am deeply suspicious of whomever is in power.

Anti-authoritarian by nature.

Maybe even a spot of oppositional defiant disorder left over from adolescence.

Mostly I just want to be left alone and not told what to do or subjected to efforts trying to make be do something I don't want to.
 
JD likes going against whoever is in power
JD hates everyone in power.
Sys in foxhole with you... sounds weird
shysterkine is a leftist talking point reader and believer. He is the proverbial 12 inches in the 6 inches crowd. He only speaks on what his party's mouth has experienced.
David A in a Foxhole with you, I think he is phobic
davidallen will choke down whatever sized dick he's ordered to. He'll recruit pussy hats to achieve the impossible.

Fixed it for you.
 
JD hates everyone in power.

Which makes it weird that I work for "The Man"....18 years now.

Used to "Fight The Power" as a criminal defense lawyer.

The I fell in love with a cop, and things got weird.

If I was ever gonna have a shot at having kids...or even getting to practice (if you know what I mean)...I had to (as she calls it) come over from "The Dark Side".
 
JD hates everyone in power.

shysterkine is a leftist talking point reader and believer. He is the proverbial 12 inches in the 6 inches crowd. He only speaks on what his party's mouth has experienced.

davidallen will choke down whatever sized dick he's ordered to. He'll recruit pussy hats to achieve the impossible.

Fixed it for you.
That stung a little. **** you goon.
 
Yesterday, our esteemed leader tweeted that he had directed Homeland Security to step up our country's "Extreme Vetting" in the wake of the NYC terror incident.

Isn't this basically admitting that our vetting process needs improvement, and he knows it? If he knew it needed to be stepped up, why didn't he take steps to fix it? Why wait until a terror attack occurs to tell Homeland Security to close the loopholes?

No need to answer my rhetorical questions. I know that this is just lip service designed to appeal to his base. Just like the travel ban was lip service and accomplished nothing. Remember all the time wasted on the travel ban? Time wasted by the POTUS and the White House. Time wasted by the courts deciding if it was constitutional and should be upheld or overturned. Let's revisit. We were told that we needed that travel ban so that we could "see what's going on" and evaluate the vetting process and make indicated changes to the process. Well, Trump has been POTUS for about a year now. Surely that should have been enough time to evaluate the vetting process, find the problems and fix them. But, I guess not, since Trump told us yesterday that he is now going to get Homeland Security to start fixing the vetting process.

He can't even if he wants to. He's too lazy and incompetent. He literally can't issue an immigration exec order without fvcking it up. He has nobody competent enough to draft a bill on health care much less negotiate and pass one. No tax cut - doesn't have the ability to get it through. No wall - again, he can't. He can't get anything done, he's too lazy and distracted with self promotion and pleasing his white trash base to actually affect substantive change. All this with a republican congress.

My only disagreement is why you're engaging the trumpanzees with logic. Alf literally can't distinguish between his illegal Bannon-created travel ban and scrutinizing applicants more closely. Don't expect a shit-throwing chimp to sing opera.
 
He can't even if he wants to. He's too lazy and incompetent. He literally can't issue an immigration exec order without fvcking it up. He has nobody competent enough to draft a bill on health care much less negotiate and pass one. No tax cut - doesn't have the ability to get it through. No wall - again, he can't. He can't get anything done, he's too lazy and distracted with self promotion and pleasing his white trash base to actually affect substantive change. All this with a republican congress.

My only disagreement is why you're engaging the trumpanzees with logic. Alf literally can't distinguish between his illegal Bannon-created travel ban and scrutinizing applicants more closely. Don't expect a shit-throwing chimp to sing opera.

During your avg. day, how many times do people look at you with understanding and say "Bless your heart?"
 
My record is identical to you saying something that makes me go "Damn, that was a smart take."

0'fer.
 
And yours knows what? She's probably more patches than the original vinyl.
 
What part don't you understand?

You probably hear that phrase all day long.
 
He can't even if he wants to. He's too lazy and incompetent. He literally can't issue an immigration exec order without fvcking it up. He has nobody competent enough to draft a bill on health care much less negotiate and pass one. No tax cut - doesn't have the ability to get it through. No wall - again, he can't. He can't get anything done, he's too lazy and distracted with self promotion and pleasing his white trash base to actually affect substantive change. All this with a republican congress.

My only disagreement is why you're engaging the trumpanzees with logic. Alf literally can't distinguish between his illegal Bannon-created travel ban and scrutinizing applicants more closely. Don't expect a shit-throwing chimp to sing opera.

Speaking of logic, I'm confused as to how Libs say that Trump's policies are destroying America and in the same breath squawk that Trump hasn't accomplished anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
Speaking of logic, I'm confused as to how Libs say that Trump's policies are destroying America and in the same breath squawk that Trump hasn't accomplished anything.

I haven't said both, but policies are one thing and actually accomplishing anything are another. Aren't you the one that doesn't want to educate other people's kids because you shouldn't have to spend the money?

I don't even give a shit right now. I'm afraid to watch local news because I can't relive bedlam. I don't wanna watch national news because it'll be abb (all about Biff). Maybe I'll get into those tv shows where people bring their old shit in and a guy tells them what it's worth.

I may just start a pissfight with medic or harry to make myself feel better. @Medic007 the heat has broke, do you stop making payments on the window unit now?
 
I haven't said both, but policies are one thing and actually accomplishing anything are another. Aren't you the one that doesn't want to educate other people's kids because you shouldn't have to spend the money?

I don't even give a shit right now. I'm afraid to watch local news because I can't relive bedlam. I don't wanna watch national news because it'll be abb (all about Biff). Maybe I'll get into those tv shows where people bring their old shit in and a guy tells them what it's worth.

I may just start a pissfight with medic or harry to make myself feel better. @Medic007 the heat has broke, do you stop making payments on the window unit now?

I agree that policies and accomplishing things are another. I'm just confused how a policy that doesn't get enacted damages anything.

I don't recall saying anything about not paying for other people's kids' educations.

Bedlam sucked. Take solace in the fact that both teams looked really bad.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT