In other words....no evidence that Trump suborned perjury....according Ronan.
meanwhile, back to Russia...........
In other words....no evidence that Trump suborned perjury....according Ronan.
In this case, from a single source to Ronan, correct.In other words....no evidence that Trump suborned perjury....according Ronan.
Let me translate.
Buzzfeed story is garbage and you were fooled, willingly and eagerly.
In this case, from a single source to Ronan, correct.
The story was made up. The guy who wrote It knew it was false. Others who spread it knew it was false.
RUSSIANS HACKED BUZZFEED!!!So bad it needs to be investigated as to who if indeed anyone was a source here.
Or Adam Schiff’s intern.RUSSIANS HACKED BUZZFEED!!!
At least we all agree on the real news. Right? Everyone now agrees The Washington Post and the Special Counsel are legit and trustworthy. Glad that’s settled.
At least we all agree on the real news. Right? Everyone now agrees The Washington Post and the Special Counsel are legit and trustworthy. Glad that’s settled.
LolKeep repeating that about the S.C. I’ve never claimed otherwise. It’ll be interesting to watch you guys turn on him though.
Muellers very good friend? The guy who has had mueller at three of his daughters weddings? They guy who has stated under oath that the president can obstruct justice, specifically and especially if he suborns perjury? The same guy that set up all the pardons for Iran Contra?
Muellers very good friend? The guy who has had mueller at three of his daughters weddings? They guy who has stated under oath that the president can obstruct justice, specifically and especially if he suborns perjury? The same guy that set up all the pardons for Iran Contra?![]()
What would being under oath add to a legal/Constitutional law opinion as to whether the President can instruct justice? Without weighing in one way or another on the substance of the argument that is just plain stupid.Muellers very good friend? The guy who has had mueller at three of his daughters weddings? They guy who has stated under oath that the president can obstruct justice, specifically and especially if he suborns perjury? The same guy that set up all the pardons for Iran Contra?![]()
Instruct justice?What would being under oath add to a legal/Constitutional law opinion as to whether the President can instruct justice? Without weighing in one way or another on the substance of the argument that is just plain stupid.
Douche move. Simple auto correct error, it happens. You know damn well what he meant to say.Instruct justice?
From the guy who wets his pants over a completely fabricated story, in thus very thread, then doubled and tripled and quadrupled down on said story.Douche move. Simple auto correct error, it happens. You know damn well what he meant to say.
It's amazing the childish responses a lot of our progressive posters give. Pee Wee Herman level arguments.From the guy who wets his pants over a completely fabricated story, in thus very thread, then doubled and tripled and quadrupled down on said story.