I hear jack Smith may have a little trouble himself if a whistle blower is to be believed. Inspector General of the DOJ has been investigating him for a year now.As soon as Trump is elected, Jack Smith will be dismissed. Inevitable.
I hear jack Smith may have a little trouble himself if a whistle blower is to be believed. Inspector General of the DOJ has been investigating him for a year now.As soon as Trump is elected, Jack Smith will be dismissed. Inevitable.
First, a special counsel doesn't have "unlimited powers." That is false.Appointing a private citizen and given them unlimited powers to prosecute a former President is legal in your opinion? Sorry but I don't think the AG has the authority to grant those powers to a private citizen that is not confirmed by the Senate. The President of the US doesn't have that authority, neither does someone working for him.
I'm questioning Judge Cannon based on her clearly incorrect and faulty legal rulings, not based on anything else. I'm questioning whether she is being neutral here based on her legal rulings. Remember, Cannon has already been overturned twice by the Eleventh Circuit. Quick overturns too, as will be the case here.Funny how you didn't call into question or criticize the Judge in the case they managed to convict Trump but you do Cannon. That guy was a left wing judicial activist whose daughter was making/raising millions on the case and made several questionable rulings. The judge also allowed testimony that wasn't supposed to be allowed according to the recent immunity ruling.
But again, a majority of the Supreme Court has already accepted that the appointment of Smith was valid. In order for them to now say it wasn't would be for them to completely undercut their immunity ruling.As to the SCOTUS ruling it would be Constitutional I don't think the issue is fully resolved. Ed Meese is making a good case against it. I don't think the SCOTUS will have a choice but to hear it even though they do not want to get involved.
Yes, this is how the process is designed to work. The Eleventh Circuit will once again overturn a lower court judge who keeps getting it wrong. The process will work. I trust the process and I'm not attacking the process.All in all I don't know how it will work out but isn't this exactly how the judicial process is designed to work? Oh and I thought you were not supposed to question Judges or the judicial system.
Even if he doesn't, I have no doubt that if Trump is allowed to be President again, Trump will definitely try to find something to go after Smith on. Trump has made it clear that he wants to enact revenge on his opponents and has even pointed towards military tribunals for his opponents. How in the world you can support any of this and claim to love our Constitution and country is beyond me.I hear jack Smith may have a little trouble himself
In other words, Trump will beat the democrooks at their own game. You people aren’t doing anything if you’re not projecting. Now, I’ll sit back and wait for your AI-generated response.Even if he doesn't, I have no doubt that if Trump is allowed to be President again, Trump will definitely try to find something to go after Smith on. Trump has made it clear that he wants to enact revenge on his opponents and has even pointed towards military tribunals for his opponents. How in the world you can support any of this and claim to love our Constitution and country is beyond me.
Just more reason why Trump must be defeated in November.
Wrong.In other words, Trump will beat the democrooks at their own game.
1. The case in NY, in which Trump was convicted was a STATE court case with zero to do with Jack Smith.Add in that Trump has not been sentenced, and there is a good chance he will never be, then he is not a convicted felon. Evey time someone calls him that is grounds for liable as there is harm that can be proven.
Wrong. It is not even close to time to move on. I have no doubt you want all of this to disappear, but it isn't going to.Time to move on.
Predicting what Trump might do is no longer working. Trying to scare people to vote a certain way. Calling him a Nazi, threat to Democracy, the gig is over. People know Senile Joe is weak, wrecked the country, and lies more than any politician in Washington currently.Even if he doesn't, I have no doubt that if Trump is allowed to be President again, Trump will definitely try to find something to go after Smith on. Trump has made it clear that he wants to enact revenge on his opponents and has even pointed towards military tribunals for his opponents. How in the world you can support any of this and claim to love our Constitution and country is beyond me.
Just more reason why Trump must be defeated in November.
Yep.In short, there is basically nothing in your post that is factually correct.
Your side just tried to kill our candidate. Time for you to drop the whole fAsCiSt schtick. You clearly have no clue what the word means.Wrong.
Show me where President Biden has suspended our legal system and placed Trump in front of a military tribunal?
When you can, you might actually have a point. Until then, you just sound like the neo-fascist cultist you are.
He is like every extremist leftist, he is pissed he missed.Your side just tried to kill our candidate. Time for you to drop the whole fAsCiSt schtick. You clearly have no clue what the word means.
Sure it is. And isn't going to stop.Predicting what Trump might do is no longer working.
I don't think anyone should call Trump a Nazi. I agree. He isn't one.Calling him a Nazi, threat to Democracy, the gig is over.
So couldn't point to the military tribunals set up for Trump, right? lol!Your side just tried to kill our candidate.
Well, I'm not going to, so you are going to have to get over it. Or better yet, just be honest about who you are. It's ok to admit who you are. You won't shock any of us, trust me.Time for you to drop the whole fAsCiSt schtick. You clearly have no clue what the word means.
Funny, all the legal experts I have been watching on the major networks, including MSNBC and CNN (i.e., lib point of view), have said this all but kills this case. But what do they know compared to your legal expertise? 😂This ruling isn't the final word on the case, not even close. This is just a legal delay tactic that Cannon has apparently agreed to play along with.
Wrong again.He is like every extremist leftist, he is pissed he missed.
This is a flat out lie. I have been flipping between MSNBC and CNN this evening keeping up with the convention and the other news, and I've not seen any legal experts claim this kills the case. Not one. Indeed, they are all saying the complete opposite. That the Eleventh Circuit will overturn the ruling.Funny, all the legal experts I have been watching on the major networks, including MSNBC and CNN (i.e., lib point of view), have said this all but kills this case.
It pretty much did. I read you said it previously. Getting to another docket pre election ? Slim or none?This is a flat out lie. I have been flipping between MSNBC and CNN this evening keeping up with the convention and the other news, and I've not seen any legal experts claim this kills the case. Not one. Indeed, they are all saying the complete opposite. That the Eleventh Circuit will overturn the ruling.
No need to lie.
I've not stated this ruling kills the case. Not once.I read you said it previously. Getting to another docket pre election ? Slim or none?
Sorry my meds thought I typed where you referenced that’s why he can not be reelected. Because you want him to be tried and if re elected he dismisses it.I've not stated this ruling kills the case. Not once.
If you are asking if this case is going to trial before election day, most likely not, no. Yes, this is a legal delay tactic, happens all the time.
But none of that kills the case.
Yes, if he is elected in November, I'm sure he will do everything in his power to kill the case since he believes he is above the law.Sorry my meds thought I typed where you referenced that’s why he can not be reelected. Because you want him to be tried and if re elected he dismisses it.
1. I didn't tie those two cases. Smith/Trump is active in more courts than that.1. The case in NY, in which Trump was convicted was a STATE court case with zero to do with Jack Smith.
2. Trump was convicted by a jury of 34 felonies. There is NO requirement that he be sentenced to be called a "felon," "convict," "crook," etc.
3. Is the word you're looking for "LIBEL" (meaning defamation) as the word "liable" has a completely different meaning.
In short, there is basically nothing in your post that is factually correct.
The case should not be thrown out. There is no legitimate legal reason for the case to be thrown out at this point and a jury found Trump guilty.2. No sentence no convict. The jury did its duty but the trial is incomplete. It must be finalized first. He most likely will not be sentenced as the case should be throw out.
2. Trump was convicted by a jury of 34 felonies. There is NO requirement that he be sentenced to be called a "felon," "convict," "crook," etc.
Like everything in government corrupt people eventually abuse the system for their own benefit. IMO no special council should ever be convened without Senate approval.First, a special counsel doesn't have "unlimited powers." That is false.
Second, I disagree with your private citizen argument. I understand Judge Cannon accepted this argument, but this argument or similar arguments have never been accepted before. Including with a majority of the Supreme Court, who accepted that the appointment of Smith was valid.
Are you claiming the Supreme Court was wrong with their immunity ruling now? A ruling you celebrated before.
I'm questioning Judge Cannon based on her clearly incorrect and faulty legal rulings, not based on anything else. I'm questioning whether she is being neutral here based on her legal rulings. Remember, Cannon has already been overturned twice by the Eleventh Circuit. Quick overturns too, as will be the case here.
I don't care who appointed her, how she votes in political elections, etc.
On the other hand, that is all you point to as it relates to the NY judge. Yet, that judge didn't make clearly incorrect and faulty rulings. His rulings were not being repeatedly overturned.
There is a big difference between the two which is clear to see.
btw, the immunity ruling came after the NYC case. The NY judge has now scheduled a hearing to consider the "new law* handled down by the Supreme Court. You can't fault the NY judge for not ruling a certain way before a majority of the Supreme Court decide to create "new law".
But again, a majority of the Supreme Court has already accepted that the appointment of Smith was valid. In order for them to now say it wasn't would be for them to completely undercut their immunity ruling.
Not to mention that only one other justice agreed with Thomas' concurrence Bearcat. That clearly isn't close to a majority.
This is just a bad ruling by Judge Cannon that will be quickly overturned. It is a delay tactic and Cannon should be ashamed of herself for playing along.
Yes, this is how the process is designed to work. The Eleventh Circuit will once again overturn a lower court judge who keeps getting it wrong. The process will work. I trust the process and I'm not attacking the process.
With that said Bearcat, you need to give today's bad ruling serious consideration. You need to step back and consider this ruling from a nonpartisan basis. I understand that it very briefly helps Trump to delay, but think about the impact this ruling would have moving forward for our country and for both Democrats and Republicans politicians in the future. Don't just jump to defending a bad ruling because it may briefly help one politician you support.
Who would be his peers? Only members of his cult who refuse to ever admit Trump does any wrong?A jury of humans, but hardly his peers
So in your opinion, no special counsel should be appointed as special counsel unless they are first approved by the Senate for that position? Correct?IMO no special council should ever be convened without Senate approval.
I always enjoy people correcting my English, German and Spanish. Boy do I need it.1. I didn't tie those two cases. Smith/Trump is active in more courts than that.
2. No sentence no convict. The jury did its duty but the trial is incomplete. It must be finalized first. He most likely will not be sentenced as the case should be throw out.
3. Thanks. My Kings English can be sketchy from time to time.
In short. Welcome back. The only thing in your post factually correct is number 3 and I always enjoy people correcting my English. It's good to have good servants to do that, you work cheap to.
Yeah. Until the roles are reversed. Wait, your party is the witch hunt party, so they probably won’t.Yeah, this is a very bad legal ruling by Cannon and in my opinion, it seriously calls into question her ability to be a neutral party in this case.
She clearly took her marching orders from Clarence Thomas here, but it is important to note that only one other Supreme Court justice agrees to signed on to Thomas' concurrence. Not to mention that, of course, concurrences aren't legal precedents.
Another tactic Smith could take here is to just simply join another United States Attorney's Office and re-indict.
What stereotype? 🤣🤣🤣Behold your Manhattan jury pool (sorry no_cents. You have to be over 18 to see this video)
Holding someone responsible for possibly breaking the law under the rule of law is not a witch hunt.Yeah. Until the roles are reversed. Wait, your party is the witch hunt party, so they probably won’t.
You’re too far gone to engage rationally and intellectually. My bad, I’ll never do it again.Holding someone responsible for possibly breaking the law under the rule of law is not a witch hunt.
Do you believe Republicans are engaged in a witch hunt concerning Hunter Biden? When they called for an investigation of President Biden over classified documents? Investigations of Hillary Clinton? Bill Clinton? Need I go on? Is all of this dIfFeReNt??
How you right-wingers can't see your own hypocrisy and foolishness is beyond me.
lol, lame.You’re too far gone to engage rationally and intellectually. My bad, I’ll never do it again.
Who would be his peers? Only members of his cult who refuse to ever admit Trump does any wrong?
Yeah, that would have been a real fair jury lol.
You clowns are pitiful.
Don’t worry. No one takes him seriously.And your delusion is profound.
You have no idea who I am or what I believe, and yet you call me a clown for stating the obvious.
Anyone who takes you seriously is a fool.
Just think, you were only inches away from freedom.Holding someone responsible for possibly breaking the law under the rule of law is not a witch hunt.
Do you believe Republicans are engaged in a witch hunt concerning Hunter Biden? When they called for an investigation of President Biden over classified documents? Investigations of Hillary Clinton? Bill Clinton? Need I go on? Is all of this dIfFeReNt??
How you right-wingers can't see your own hypocrisy and foolishness is beyond me.