What is wrong with his questions?
The questions I’m being “fed.”
What is wrong with his questions?
The questions I’m being “fed.”
Because it’s a REALLY REALLY stupid question, and board theme in general. You sound like an idiot when you ask the question.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.po...7/17/dnc-server-hack-russia-trump-2016-219017
It happened, it still happens and it will always happen now.
You peddle those conservative conspiracy theories tho - you do you lol
Yep. And he won’t answer this question either. Has this always been his tactic? Pretending he doesn’t see questions with uncomfortable answers?
Sweet baby jesus you've gone all in, haven't you? He filed bankruptcy x 4 after inheriting obscene wealth, he's not real smart. He's a grade V narcissist. He doesn't care about you, or me, or the country, he only cares about his status. Period. He is also corrupt to his marrow. And a pathological liar. And amazingly petty, with bad taste, and fat too.
He is also under unrelenting, constant anxiety and stress and has knocked out so many well done filets and whores that yes, he's getting senile. (As an aside, I've never known anybody to run whores and chase it as hard as him that didn't drink.) He has surrounded himself with yes men and can't process details well. His attention and attention to detail is gone. He can't comprehend beyond 5 second recliner fart-style narratives. The reversal today where he just saided da wong words (he uses the best words, best brain, etc) was comical, it was so pitiful. Okay, I'm so glad there's a deep state that lets us sleep at night and circles back to Deutschland and says ignore the lunatic, and tells Russia to at least bring some Vaseline next time. Those founding fathers were smart MFers, weren't they? [High Five]
Basically, you've been gaslighted and you've bought the Putin narrative and if I can take a minute and make this about me -- it hurts. You're gullible. Ignorant, given to unfounded conjecture and wild conspiracies, like an old hillbilly. He plainly lies all the time yet you trust him. You should know better. It explains how tyrants get control, they just get a cult of personality going and people like you will follow the flute right into the river.
Viva Cuba, I say we go Teddy R. and take it. And Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Puerto Rico (again), any remaining independent caribbean islands,HondurasRoatan, Cozumel and the Playa Dels, and Belize. And Chile. Peru, too, since we're down there.
Cuba needs to be a state and just open it up for BUSINESS. It's too close to Fla and has too much potential to just sit there all commied up, right there. Obama went a little Teddy Rex, just nicely and over the long haul. You know - politically. You beat Cuba by infecting them with 'murica and Obama knew that.
The Russians are different. They are, always have been, and always will be bad news. We haven't done shit to them and this is what happens. We need a real POTUS to remind them who they're fvcking with but instead we have stammering senile Biff.
He also lost the popular vote, like Bush. Remember how well that turned out?
Hey @syskatine You know how I know you're a moron when thinking about "business" (and therefore your opinion is shit)? See sentence 2 from this epic novel:
All the rest is your amazing skill for mindreading (another habit of the weak stick)
I prescribe a 2 xanax + 1 ecstasy cocktail per day for 3 weeks in the Bahamas for you. Get your mind right, son.
Incelese translation? Anybody? Bahamas sounds good, but the rest is incoherent or flirting with drug addiction. Wait.... Everything good?
Wow. Every sentence above that contains "hash" is wrong.You know what that article is missing
The fact that without the server you can not verify the hashes
How do they know Crowdstrike wasn’t paid to alter the hashes?
After all, we know the Mueller team couldn’t verify the hashes with no server
Crowdstrike says data was pulled in large intervals
Mueller says gradually
The Nunes/HCSPI memo says they also attempted to hack the RNC
Mueller omits this information
They say they know it was Russians because it was a hash found in previous attempts by Russians
Are we just going to accept that top notch hackers would be so obvious?
Seems to me that any indictment would be pretty flimsy if they can’t verify anything
Why can’t they verify?
You have to have the server to verify the hashes which is crucial
I know, all the wrong questions
Answer the questions.
I’ll ask again. Who was the last US president not to meet with his Russian counterpart. Who?
Who was the last US president who likely borrowed from Russian banks?
Answer the questions.
I’ll ask again. Who was the last US president not to meet with his Russian counterpart. Who?
Wow. Every sentence above that contains "hash" is wrong.
Answer the questions.
I’ll ask again. Who was the last US president not to meet with his Russian counterpart. Who?
Who was the last US president who likely borrowed from Russian banks?
Really?
So, without the server to verify the hashmatches, how do they prove that the images truly came from the server in question or that they weren't altered.
Or are you going to say hashes don’t matter?
You just seem to have a general misunderstanding of hashes.Really?
So, without the server to verify the hashmatches, how do they prove that the images truly came from the server in question or that they weren't altered.
Or are you going to say hashes don’t matter?
Hoover
what could trump possibly have done or said that would make someone like @syskatine nod thoughtfully and think 'good job man' ?
Not be there. Wth was he meeting that awful leader for?
Who was the last president to have a one on one (only translators) meeting with his Russian counterpart ?I was looking for Roosevelt, but Hell maybe Hoover. I really don't know for sure - other than that every single president since WW2 has.
So, when I asked @syskatine:
and got this as an answer:
can we agree that @syskatine has an unrealistic expectation?
I was looking for Roosevelt, but Hell maybe Hoover. I really don't know for sure - other than that every single president since WW2 has.
So, when I asked @syskatine:
and got this as an answer:
can we agree that @syskatine has an unrealistic expectation?
I was looking for Roosevelt, but Hell maybe Hoover. I really don't know for sure - other than that every single president since WW2 has.
So, when I asked @syskatine:
and got this as an answer:
can we agree that @syskatine has an unrealistic expectation?
Who was the last president to have a one on one (only translators) meeting with his Russian counterpart ?
oh my god felicia! that changes everything.
Okay, I'll play. Are you contending that a previous president meeting with Putin somehow obligates Biff to also meet him?
Did you hear this point from somewhere?
Yes. I am contending that. Specially. And obviously.
Why does one president meeting with Putin obligate another president to do so as well?
Gonna answer the question?oh my god felicia! that changes everything.