ADVERTISEMENT

Trump changes his Russian tune

Because it’s a REALLY REALLY stupid question, and board theme in general. You sound like an idiot when you ask the question.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.po...7/17/dnc-server-hack-russia-trump-2016-219017

It happened, it still happens and it will always happen now.


You peddle those conservative conspiracy theories tho - you do you lol

You know what that article is missing

The fact that without the server you can not verify the hashes

How do they know Crowdstrike wasn’t paid to alter the hashes?

After all, we know the Mueller team couldn’t verify the hashes with no server

Crowdstrike says data was pulled in large intervals

Mueller says gradually

The Nunes/HCSPI memo says they also attempted to hack the RNC

Mueller omits this information

They say they know it was Russians because it was a hash found in previous attempts by Russians

Are we just going to accept that top notch hackers would be so obvious?

Seems to me that any indictment would be pretty flimsy if they can’t verify anything

Why can’t they verify?

You have to have the server to verify the hashes which is crucial

I know, all the wrong questions
 
Yep. And he won’t answer this question either. Has this always been his tactic? Pretending he doesn’t see questions with uncomfortable answers?

Most assuredly yes. His other play is the nonanswer-answer.

He's a "weak stick."

Hey @syskatine You know how I know you're a moron when thinking about "business" (and therefore your opinion is shit)? See sentence 2 from this epic novel:

All the rest is your amazing skill for mindreading (another habit of the weak stick)

I prescribe a 2 xanax + 1 ecstasy cocktail per day for 3 weeks in the Bahamas for you. Get your mind right, son.

Sweet baby jesus you've gone all in, haven't you? He filed bankruptcy x 4 after inheriting obscene wealth, he's not real smart. He's a grade V narcissist. He doesn't care about you, or me, or the country, he only cares about his status. Period. He is also corrupt to his marrow. And a pathological liar. And amazingly petty, with bad taste, and fat too.

He is also under unrelenting, constant anxiety and stress and has knocked out so many well done filets and whores that yes, he's getting senile. (As an aside, I've never known anybody to run whores and chase it as hard as him that didn't drink.) He has surrounded himself with yes men and can't process details well. His attention and attention to detail is gone. He can't comprehend beyond 5 second recliner fart-style narratives. The reversal today where he just saided da wong words (he uses the best words, best brain, etc) was comical, it was so pitiful. Okay, I'm so glad there's a deep state that lets us sleep at night and circles back to Deutschland and says ignore the lunatic, and tells Russia to at least bring some Vaseline next time. Those founding fathers were smart MFers, weren't they? [High Five]

Basically, you've been gaslighted and you've bought the Putin narrative and if I can take a minute and make this about me -- it hurts. You're gullible. Ignorant, given to unfounded conjecture and wild conspiracies, like an old hillbilly. He plainly lies all the time yet you trust him. You should know better. It explains how tyrants get control, they just get a cult of personality going and people like you will follow the flute right into the river.

Viva Cuba, I say we go Teddy R. and take it. And Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Puerto Rico (again), any remaining independent caribbean islands, Honduras Roatan, Cozumel and the Playa Dels, and Belize. And Chile. Peru, too, since we're down there.

Cuba needs to be a state and just open it up for BUSINESS. It's too close to Fla and has too much potential to just sit there all commied up, right there. Obama went a little Teddy Rex, just nicely and over the long haul. You know - politically. You beat Cuba by infecting them with 'murica and Obama knew that.

The Russians are different. They are, always have been, and always will be bad news. We haven't done shit to them and this is what happens. We need a real POTUS to remind them who they're fvcking with but instead we have stammering senile Biff.

He also lost the popular vote, like Bush. Remember how well that turned out?
 
Hey @syskatine You know how I know you're a moron when thinking about "business" (and therefore your opinion is shit)? See sentence 2 from this epic novel:
All the rest is your amazing skill for mindreading (another habit of the weak stick)
I prescribe a 2 xanax + 1 ecstasy cocktail per day for 3 weeks in the Bahamas for you. Get your mind right, son.

Incelese translation? Anybody? Bahamas sounds good, but the rest is incoherent or flirting with drug addiction. Wait.... Everything good?
 
You know what that article is missing

The fact that without the server you can not verify the hashes

How do they know Crowdstrike wasn’t paid to alter the hashes?

After all, we know the Mueller team couldn’t verify the hashes with no server

Crowdstrike says data was pulled in large intervals

Mueller says gradually

The Nunes/HCSPI memo says they also attempted to hack the RNC

Mueller omits this information

They say they know it was Russians because it was a hash found in previous attempts by Russians

Are we just going to accept that top notch hackers would be so obvious?

Seems to me that any indictment would be pretty flimsy if they can’t verify anything

Why can’t they verify?

You have to have the server to verify the hashes which is crucial

I know, all the wrong questions
Wow. Every sentence above that contains "hash" is wrong.
 
Wow. Every sentence above that contains "hash" is wrong.

Really?

So, without the server to verify the hashmatches, how do they prove that the images truly came from the server in question or that they weren't altered.

Or are you going to say hashes don’t matter?
 
Really?

So, without the server to verify the hashmatches, how do they prove that the images truly came from the server in question or that they weren't altered.

Or are you going to say hashes don’t matter?

Defense counsel is certainly free to question the credibility of evidence presented.

So I guess we’ll see how successful your argument is.
 
Really?

So, without the server to verify the hashmatches, how do they prove that the images truly came from the server in question or that they weren't altered.

Or are you going to say hashes don’t matter?
You just seem to have a general misunderstanding of hashes.
 

I was looking for Roosevelt, but Hell maybe Hoover. I really don't know for sure - other than that every single president since WW2 has.

So, when I asked @syskatine:

what could trump possibly have done or said that would make someone like @syskatine nod thoughtfully and think 'good job man' ?

and got this as an answer:

Not be there. Wth was he meeting that awful leader for?

can we agree that @syskatine has an unrealistic expectation?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrunkenViking
I was looking for Roosevelt, but Hell maybe Hoover. I really don't know for sure - other than that every single president since WW2 has.

So, when I asked @syskatine:



and got this as an answer:



can we agree that @syskatine has an unrealistic expectation?
Who was the last president to have a one on one (only translators) meeting with his Russian counterpart ?
 
I was looking for Roosevelt, but Hell maybe Hoover. I really don't know for sure - other than that every single president since WW2 has.

So, when I asked @syskatine:



and got this as an answer:



can we agree that @syskatine has an unrealistic expectation?

Roosevelt DEFINITELY met with his counterpart from Russia (Stalin)...more than once.

Yalta Conference ring a bell?
 
  • Like
Reactions: HanAholeSolo2.0
I was looking for Roosevelt, but Hell maybe Hoover. I really don't know for sure - other than that every single president since WW2 has.

So, when I asked @syskatine:



and got this as an answer:



can we agree that @syskatine has an unrealistic expectation?

I have no problem with them meeting.

Didn’t like what I heard after the meeting though.
 
37295086_1705171009574440_2875109790080565248_n.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0rangeSlice
This has been a political disaster for Trump and one of his own making.

Trump has never looked more like Nixon than he has over the past few days. His ego, paranoia, and maybe even questionable connections are starting to catch up with him.
 
Trump was given a briefing during the transition by Obama’s intelligence officials proving Russian meddling and interference.

To defend him is asinine and shows how gullible and dumb you are.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT