ADVERTISEMENT

Tolerant and Kind Liberal Lefties

Enabled if not actively cultivated LCD politics. Supported a fascist, pathological liar. Her father boasted a week ago about how mean and nasty his supporters were. He likes that. She likes that when the people are supportive of her father. When they're not... she's a victim?
It's amazing how you lefties can continue this narrative with a straight face. If we take the time to examine the campaigns of Trump and Clinton, we'll find this:

One of the campaigns was often throwing out hate speech about supporters of the other candidate, including naming them deplorable and unredeemable. That rhetroic is still quite common by supporters of that campaign. This campaign used labels with reckless abandon because it was unable to debate policy effectively. This campaign engaged in inciting and supporting violence against it's opponent's supporters.

The other campaign focused on the opponent, rarely labeling or using hateful rhetoric toward the supporters of the opponent. This campaign defended it's supporters from the relentless and nasty attacks instigated by the opponents campaign, including actual violence.

Care to guess which campaign is which?
 
we are smart enough to know he's a New York liberal...

PhWUpU1.gif
 
A thread to post examples and post hypocrisy.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...reams-father-ruining-country-asks-flight.html

While she flew commercial and sat with her kids. Kudos Lefties, kudos.

Amazingly hypocritical that you post nothing about the redneck ranting and gloating that Trump won, to a plane full of quiet, civil strangers, but are sooo alarmed that someone expressed a negative thought in the princess' presence. You're such a fanboy.

Every time I actually read one of the conservative "fact" (to the extent you recognize objective facts in our post-fact, Trump era) stories and of course it's bull.

First, it's a conservative tabloid.

Second, the secret service did nothing.

Third, the supposed accosters said they didn't accost or yell.

Fourth, a third witness denied anyone was accosted and confirmed the guys' statement. Nobody said there was screaming except - big shock coming!! -- the conservative tabloid.

Now the princess mustn't hear a disharmonious opinion. And wtf is a billionairy, president elect's daughter doing flying coach? See how tight he is with everyone else?

I have to give him some kudos on one thing: Demonizing the defense contractors. Great move.
 
@syskatine You are exactly like people who defend Joe Mixon because he plays for their team.

Hard to believe you are spending this much energy in the obvious wrong side of something like this.

Political banter is one thing but this is honestly disappointing - not that you care, but yeah.

Pot, the kettle just called and wants its black paint back.
 
Pot, the kettle just called and wants its black paint back.

Then it should be easy for you to find one thing I've ever posted that's directly comparable to your disgusting behavior in this thread.

While we are waiting, let's get you back on track. I gave you some very specific feedback to your limpdick response to the question - what has she done to deserve treatment like this.

Your reply was "bugs bunny."

While you are a cartoon character at this point, you are no bugs bunny.

More like Wyle E Coyote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TD_4OSU
Amazingly hypocritical that you post nothing about the redneck ranting and gloating that Trump won, to a plane full of quiet, civil strangers, but are sooo alarmed that someone expressed a negative thought in the princess' presence. You're such a fanboy.

Every time I actually read one of the conservative "fact" (to the extent you recognize objective facts in our post-fact, Trump era) stories and of course it's bull.

First, it's a conservative tabloid.

Second, the secret service did nothing.

Third, the supposed accosters said they didn't accost or yell.

Fourth, a third witness denied anyone was accosted and confirmed the guys' statement. Nobody said there was screaming except - big shock coming!! -- the conservative tabloid.

Now the princess mustn't hear a disharmonious opinion. And wtf is a billionairy, president elect's daughter doing flying coach? See how tight he is with everyone else?

I have to give him some kudos on one thing: Demonizing the defense contractors. Great move.

giphy.gif
 
Amazingly hypocritical that you post nothing about the redneck ranting and gloating that Trump won, to a plane full of quiet, civil strangers, but are sooo alarmed that someone expressed a negative thought in the princess' presence. You're such a fanboy.

Every time I actually read one of the conservative "fact" (to the extent you recognize objective facts in our post-fact, Trump era) stories and of course it's bull.

First, it's a conservative tabloid.

Second, the secret service did nothing.

Third, the supposed accosters said they didn't accost or yell.

Fourth, a third witness denied anyone was accosted and confirmed the guys' statement. Nobody said there was screaming except - big shock coming!! -- the conservative tabloid.

Now the princess mustn't hear a disharmonious opinion. And wtf is a billionairy, president elect's daughter doing flying coach? See how tight he is with everyone else?

I have to give him some kudos on one thing: Demonizing the defense contractors. Great move.

I want to re-visit the level of your idiocy in this post.

Dude yelling on plane is an idiot. Obvious...OBVIOUS...unseemly behavior. Is there more to that story?

Since that is one of your hangups, your belief that I'm a hypocrit for not calling out "my own," that sore spot of yours has been satisfied.

As for the rest of your bulletpoints, are you high? Are you asserting this is "Fake News?" Yes/No

If no, then are you standing by your assertion that Ivanka deserves some grief? Yes/No

As is merited by what of her behaviour?

Where do you personally draw the line as to what actions deserve pussified agitator lip?

What is the threshold where that lip is excessive?

You have the floor, boss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
I want to re-visit the level of your idiocy in this post.

Dude yelling on plane is an idiot. Obvious...OBVIOUS...unseemly behavior. Is there more to that story?

Since that is one of your hangups, your belief that I'm a hypocrit for not calling out "my own," that sore spot of yours has been satisfied.

Thank you, but I shouldn't have to point it out. You're right - it's OBVIOUS "unseemly" behavior, but you didn't run over and post about it. Why not? That's a fair question.


As for the rest of your bulletpoints, are you high? Are you asserting this is "Fake News?" Yes/No

I don't know. I already made my points about the accuracy of the article. I don't know whether the Daily Mail is "Fake News" or tabloid or both, but the article has some spin that's plainly contra to the witnesses interviews. Call it whatever you want and I'll play along.

If no, then are you standing by your assertion that Ivanka deserves some grief? Yes/No
Poor question. I think we all have to put up with some grief under the First Amendment from time to time. None of us probably "deserve" it but we deal with it to some extent because that's what comes from being in a free society. It's like those people on the airplane -- they didn't "deserve" it, but it didn't hurt them, either.

Do you think Ivanka deserves more deference than all the passengers on the plane where your fellow conservative went Mega?

As is merited by what of her behaviour?

Already addressed in this thread. As far as I can see you're more traumatized than her. I mean, do YOU need a safe space over it? Sounds like nobody can even express an opinion within what, 50 feet of her? A "no unpopular speech" zone around the President's fam is a little fascist, imo...

What is the threshold where that lip is excessive?

Excessive as in deserving of getting thrown off a plane? I don't know -- probably more rigorous since it's a captive audience on a common carrier, than standing in a parade where people can walk away. The mega guy probably crossed the line, I could be talked in or out of it. Facts are just too sketchy on the Princess' affront to really know whether the comment was openly hostile to the point it created fear for her safety (probably not since the secret service was there and did nothing) or like, three seconds of snark 4 rows away and it's over. I don't know, and courts have wrestled with these boundaries of speech for a long time.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT