Today's Kim.com news
- Thread starter HighStickHarry
- Start date
Kim Dotcom, the founder of the defunct file sharing site Megaupload who wants to bring his Internet Party to the United States in 2016, said Wikileaks founder Julian Assange will be Hillary Clinton’s “worst nightmare.”
In an interview with Emily Chang on Bloomberg’s Studio 1.0, Dotcom was asked about a tweet he sent in December saying that he himself will be “Hillary’s worst nightmare in 2016.”
The interview raises the question of the role hacking could play in an election involving someone as simultaneously high profile and secretive as Clinton.
“I have to say it’s probably more Julian,” who threatens Hillary, Dotcom said. “But I’m aware of some of the things that are going to be roadblocks for her.”
Assange has access to information, Dotcom said, though he added that he didn't know anything more specific.
“If I can provide some transparency with these people and make them part of what the Internet Party stands for, then, you know, I will be happy to do that,” Dotcom told Chang.
Now residing in New Zealand, Dotcom has been charged in the U.S. with copyright infringement. He is fighting the charges. In the interview, he called Clinton, who had signed his extradition request, “an enemy of Internet freedom”—but expressed fondness for her, as well as for President Barack Obama. "You know the crazy thing is, I actually like them," Dotcom said.
In an interview with Emily Chang on Bloomberg’s Studio 1.0, Dotcom was asked about a tweet he sent in December saying that he himself will be “Hillary’s worst nightmare in 2016.”
The interview raises the question of the role hacking could play in an election involving someone as simultaneously high profile and secretive as Clinton.
“I have to say it’s probably more Julian,” who threatens Hillary, Dotcom said. “But I’m aware of some of the things that are going to be roadblocks for her.”
Assange has access to information, Dotcom said, though he added that he didn't know anything more specific.
“If I can provide some transparency with these people and make them part of what the Internet Party stands for, then, you know, I will be happy to do that,” Dotcom told Chang.
Now residing in New Zealand, Dotcom has been charged in the U.S. with copyright infringement. He is fighting the charges. In the interview, he called Clinton, who had signed his extradition request, “an enemy of Internet freedom”—but expressed fondness for her, as well as for President Barack Obama. "You know the crazy thing is, I actually like them," Dotcom said.
Yesterday it was all about "can't wait to see Kim drop his bomb".
Today we are turning our focus to Assange.
Today we are turning our focus to Assange.
This conspiracy is still very much alive in my mind but today was nothing. "Sources" without proof only work one way in today's news cycle. The right has to have more than proof to get their stories out.
This is very well put.
On the right, there is no margin for error (or anything less than 100% overwhelming proof) -- the benefit of the doubt will *always* go to the left.
At least in the mainstream.....
You have to admit you do not guard your credibility very closely.
Hannity no longer going to discuss Seth rich per his show tonight. Because the family asked him not to.
Pretty sad that the tin hat wearing crowd has put them through so much BS.
I agree. almost as bad as Podesta having their son sloppily murdered.
Or lemmings. Man has bills to pay I am sure.
As with PizzaGate and KDC - you are being played.
One nugget still sticks in the can't dismiss it part of my brain. The DNC refused to turn over their hardware to the FBI for forensic examination. Instead they chose to work with an IT firm that has ties to top Democrats and was paid for by DNC. Why? What are/did they hide or not want seen?
What if, and maybe there's some foil crinkling around my head, there was no Russian hack and the email leak was in fact an inside job? Forensic examination likely would have given some information regarding the who's and how's. Can we actually trust the work of a company that was paid by the so hilariously corrupt DNC?
Definitely makes me say hmmmm. Still.
What if, and maybe there's some foil crinkling around my head, there was no Russian hack and the email leak was in fact an inside job? Forensic examination likely would have given some information regarding the who's and how's. Can we actually trust the work of a company that was paid by the so hilariously corrupt DNC?
Definitely makes me say hmmmm. Still.
So we're gonna stop talking about shit that there is no evidence for now?
Red pill, that's hilarious considering most of you are due for your third refill.
Red pill, that's hilarious considering most of you are due for your third refill.
it's going to be sad watching Fox News fall. Liberals are winning the long game.
Not really, networks matter less everyday.
What we should be worried about is online censorship.
What we should be worried about is online censorship.
