ADVERTISEMENT

These two rats

more info on the pakistani spy imran awan the dnc tech boy who debbie wasserman schulz used to monitor dem congressional emails for starters

the researcher deserves a follow

Awan bros are where you Q guys should have been focused all along. I think Seth Rich was a distraction.

Rush Limbaugh, of all people, was the first to correctly point out that the transfer speeds from the DNC servers were too fast to have been done over the internet. The speeds were consistent with a device connected via USB. DNC 'hack' was done on site. Either means Rich or Awan bros. One was shot in the back, the others were immediately shipped out of the country by Babblermouth Schultz.
 
Awan bros are where you Q guys should have been focused all along. I think Seth Rich was a distraction.

Rush Limbaugh, of all people, was the first to correctly point out that the transfer speeds from the DNC servers were too fast to have been done over the internet. The speeds were consistent with a device connected via USB.

not a Q guy
never listened to rush more than 60 second clips

Awan worked with CCP/DNC to control congress with their email passwords and got the shield


Rich piped out info from inside DNC HQ
and got the sword


capital police had awan computers DWS freaked out to get it back

fedbi has Rich laptop

these two are entirely different situations
 
not a Q guy
never listened to rush more than 60 second clips

Awan worked with CCP/DNC to control congress with their email passwords and got the shield


Rich piped out info from inside DNC HQ
and got the sword


capital police had awan computers DWS freaked out to get it back

fedbi has Rich laptop

these two are entirely different situations
I honestly can't tell what you are trying to say half the time, but It sounds like you agree with me that the Awan bros are where the attention should be. I've always thought this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OUSOONER67
Rd, what date do today’s numbers get revised downward (again) ?
This. Not one reporter asked when these numbers get revised downward like most of the numbers for the last 4 years. Why should anyone trust the numbers. They have proven to be politically motivated, so many times, no one should believe them.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT