The Supreme Court has agreed to address a challenge to the Electoral College

[AC_Exotic]

This is simple.

What does the actual US Constitution say?

 

[davidallen]

This is simple.

What does the actual US Constitution say?

Spent the afternoon putting a 3D printer together with the boy... This is his first print.

 

[davidallen]

This has nothing to do with faithless electoral college votes. It is about not allowing a select group to pick the President and that a majority of states would insure to make a wiser decision.

Totally antithetical to the point you are trying to make.

Poor reading comprehension.

 

[davidallen]

This is simple.

What does the actual US Constitution say?

States decide how Electors are selected and vote. QED.

 

[OUSOONER67]

View embedded media

Spent the afternoon putting a 3D printer together with the boy... This is his first print.

 

[Sunburnt Indian]

This is simple.

What does the actual US Constitution say?

Soon to be Justice Thomas looked me in the eye and swore to uphold the Constitution of the United States. So far, he has kept his promise.

Soon to be Justice Sotomayor looked me in the eye and promised to uphold the Constitution of the United States. She lied to me.

 

[imprimis]

If it passes muster in SCOTUS and becomes a “popular vote,” type deal the cheating and skullduggery will be rampant. Would be time to say hello to the Balkanization of the US. Can’t think there are many states that want to be run by the voters of CA, NY, MA, IL, OR, VT, NH, MI and WA, since they have manifestly proved they mostly can’t keep their own states and cities solvent.

I said last summer that the potential for this happening is why CA was looking into voter laws to allow 16 year olds to vote (may have already passed by now who knows).

If this happens there would be an immediate Constitutional Convention called. There are sufficient states not named CA, NY, WA, NJ, MA, IL and OR which would likely vote to enact a Convention.