The Many Things Democrat’s Got Wrong About the Mueller Report
- Thread starter MegaPoke
- Start date
So much for the latest conspiracy that Barr is repressing the details of the report and somehow Mueller and his inquisition aren’t objecting to their report being hijacked.
It’ll all come out. All of it.
LOL "above and beyond" ....... but won't release it. Literally holding it back and saying he's going above and beyond simultaneously and his #bornfollowers don't question that narrative.
Hypernormalization at its finest.LOL "above and beyond" ....... but won't release it. Literally holding it back and saying he's going above and beyond simultaneously and his #bornfollowers don't question that narrative.
It's simply going to take a while for AG Barr to go through Mueller's report and search for the infinitesimally small word or phrase the democrats believe is inside to keep their hopes alive that their twisted convoluted and disjointed obstruction narrative exists against overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
LOL "above and beyond" ....... but won't release it. Literally holding it back and saying he's going above and beyond simultaneously and his #bornfollowers don't question that narrative.
How many times must I say I want everything released?
While he may be mistaken on the specifics he is not wrong on the generality. A small geographic section of the country would dominate the entire political landscape.
https://mises.org/wire/lets-expand-electoral-college
LOL "above and beyond" ....... but won't release it. Literally holding it back and saying he's going above and beyond simultaneously and his #bornfollowers don't question that narrative.
Let’s release everything and see what we got. Cool? Let’s put all the cards on the table for the world to see and quit moving goalposts.
Actually Mega, under a popular vote system you would need over 50% to dominate. Either way those cities do not vote as a monolith. Hillary only got 59% of the New York vote.
No actually your vote in Oklahoma would count exactly the same as a vote in NY.
So why do we elect every other office by popular vote instead of an arcane system?
This is actually a good point, shouldn't we base who wins the football game based on who scores the most points rather than who wins the most quarters?
Again, why is it in our representative republic the popular vote is used for all other offices? And if having a representative republic requires that our presidential elections are done in a manner that doesn't represent a majority of voters, is it good to have a representative republic?
That would be great. I would much prefer Trump as president accountable to people instead of geography. Again, no one is disputing the legitimacy of Trump's election or even that he could have won the popular vote if he wanted to. The point is Trump trying to win the popular vote is a better system than trump spending all of his time in swing states.
What if the people who wrote the constitution explicitly outlined a way to **** with it and acknowledged that ****ing with it is a necessary thing from time to time?
Either way a coalition of states awarding their electors to the popular vote winner does not require the constitution to be ****ed with.
The point remains that you are completely wrong about the dominance of 3 cities.
I can't see real good. Is that "STATES" plural?
Yep. 50 of them. And the glue is representative government.
Communists don’t get that.
I agree with him. She’s one of the best out there, if not the best.
Sara Carter has been relentless too.
A honey badger in seeking the liberals kryptonite, the truth.
