ADVERTISEMENT

The Grassley Memo

Lol...inconsistent statements “reportedly” made by Christopher Steele. Haha nice try. Where’s the proof of said inconsistency?

Carry on
 
Link to testimony inconsistencies? Lol...evidence isn’t friends with Republicans.

Carry on.
 
Lol. Steele was given information from a "foreign" source via a Clinton guy through an Obama State Department official.

Wow Dimocrats, real credible guy that Steele is turning out to be. Clinton lackeys make up shit and pass it to Steele to try to give it some appearance of credibility, and try to hide it by passing it through the State Department. That's a new level of stupid.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/d...ontact-obama-state-department/article/2648099
 
Lol. Steele was given information from a "foreign" source via a Clinton guy through an Obama State Department official.

Wow Dimocrats, real credible guy that Steele is turning out to be. Clinton lackeys make up shit and pass it to Steele to try to give it some appearance of credibility, and try to hide it by passing it through the State Department. That's a new level of stupid.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/d...ontact-obama-state-department/article/2648099

Link to made up shit? Oh you don’t have links/evidence? Weird...shocking...completely unexpected lol.


Carry on.
 
at some point in this administration you and those like you are gonna wake up in a new world
538cfec62803d1152bfb3c5b8563b4f0.jpg
 
Let me guess... a warrant application didn't have enough exculpatory language. Cue the outrage. Anything but let Biff be investigated.
 
Link to made up shit? Oh you don’t have links/evidence? Weird...shocking...completely unexpected lol.


Carry on.
Man, you can always tell how much a particular thing makes the Trumpanzees uncomfortable. The narrative turns into screeching, and in the case of one of the board's most notable Trumpanzees Clintard Scott, he just starts mindlessly flinging shit at his keyboard.

Muh Russia is turning out to be as flabby as that useless sack of chewed bubble gum you lefty dipshits voted for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
Man, you can always tell how much a particular thing makes the Trumpanzees uncomfortable. The narrative turns into screeching, and in the case of one of the board's most notable Trumpanzees Clintard Scott, he just starts mindlessly flinging shit at his keyboard.

Muh Russia is turning out to be as flabby as that useless sack of chewed bubble gum you lefty dipshits voted for.



7266679_C_DE2_C_449_A_8_BEB_93_D731_B0_A328.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
Lol. Steele was given information from a "foreign" source via a Clinton guy through an Obama State Department official.

Wow Dimocrats, real credible guy that Steele is turning out to be. Clinton lackeys make up shit and pass it to Steele to try to give it some appearance of credibility, and try to hide it by passing it through the State Department. That's a new level of stupid.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/d...ontact-obama-state-department/article/2648099

That does it. I'm cancelling my subscription to the Steele Dossier. Alas, Biff didn't have hookers piss oh him.

Why so much anxiety over the dossier? That thing is behind every tree and bush with you people.
 
That's interesting framing.

High character individual here.

Your super power is invulnerability to logic. Like bullets off of Superman.

So.... why? There have been a trillion awful things said and reported about Biff. Why is disproving that dossier such a big deal to you people?

You do understand it's not going to get the investigation into Biff's corruption dismantled? Your POTUS is still going to have an objective look at his conduct whether you like it or not? So why, Brad?
 
Your super power is invulnerability to logic. Like bullets off of Superman.

So.... why? There have been a trillion awful things said and reported about Biff. Why is disproving that dossier such a big deal to you people?

You do understand it's not going to get the investigation into Biff's corruption dismantled? Your POTUS is still going to have an objective look at his conduct whether you like it or not? So why, Brad?

I don't care about the dossier.

I care how it was used by non-elected employees of the Federal government.

That would be true regardless of who is President, what party is control, etc.

You have a lot of reading to do.
 
Why so much anxiety over the dossier? That thing is behind every tree and bush with you people.
I don't have any anxiety over it. It's nothing more than a giant steaming pile of political bullshit supplied by the retards at Democrat, Inc. I just like pointing it out because the Trumpanzee response from you useful idiots is very entertaining.

Now, there are definitively folks that have some actual anxiety over the dossier and what role it played in Muh Russia. And it's clear that those folks that have the anxiety aren't the ones releasing memos. That's pretty comical as well.

For the real serious, did you and Tea Pain lock down those Twitter share button Bots or does Nancy Paulson still have you guys chasing empty leads? Updates, bro, they're needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
Your super power is invulnerability to logic. Like bullets off of Superman.

So.... why? There have been a trillion awful things said and reported about Biff. Why is disproving that dossier such a big deal to you people?

You do understand it's not going to get the investigation into Biff's corruption dismantled? Your POTUS is still going to have an objective look at his conduct whether you like it or not? So why, Brad?

Because it's the cornerstone of illegal wiretapping by the previous administration.

No big deal.

Any more basic shit you need me to clear up?
 
Lol yeah, #32 And still no indictment. After Howdy got his ass handed to him by Hillary Clinton I wondered why it was so quiet for so long.

So... What do you think Flynn is saying?

Given he scores ultra high in conscientiousness, I imagine he's telling the truth.

High conscientiousness is correlated with higher empathy towards others.

Right leaners score more highly in both.

Leftists score lower in conscientiousness, tend to be more disorganized, and are more prone to impulsive behavior.

Though leftists score higher in openness, the fact that they score lower on empathy (relating to others) means they are susceptible to, well, all those negative tendencies we repeatedly see from you (all) that are general costs to society. Those things like hypocrisy, being judgemental, gravitating toward authoritinarianism when you can't relate, etc...
 
Given he scores ultra high in conscientiousness, I imagine he's telling the truth.

High conscientiousness is correlated with higher empathy towards others.

Right leaners score more highly in both.

Leftists score lower in conscientiousness, tend to be more disorganized, and are more prone to impulsive behavior.

Though leftists score higher in openness, the fact that they score lower on empathy (relating to others) means they are susceptible to, well, all those negative tendencies we repeatedly see from you (all) that are general costs to society. Those things like hypocrisy, being judgemental, gravitating toward authoritinarianism when you can't relate, etc...

There's a FANTASTIC article out on J. Edgar that touches on some of that. I suggest you read it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrunkenViking
Gawd, I love these conversations with the invisible; beer and filling in the blanks rock!
 
  • Like
Reactions: imprimis
From tonight

not a fan of Mark Levin, but he does a great job of concisely breaking down what's happening


Highly suggested:


 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT