ADVERTISEMENT

The difference between Hamas and Israel

86% of Jews see Israel as vital to the ongoing existence of the Jewish people. Just because you say anti-Zionism =/= antisemitism, doesn't mean it's true.
I believe if you go back and read my comments you will see I have not uttered one negative word about the Jewish faith, Jewish people or the concept of Zionism. Government actions are government actions regardless of any other characteristic, and as such they are worthy targets of criticism when they overstep their moral authority. Unlike Republicans who wither in fear when called racist even though they are not I will not back down from criticizing actions by the Israeli government I find offensive just because someone thinks he can take a shortcut to avoid the criticism by calling me an antisemite.
 
Tell that to the 30,000 or so Yemenis who were slaughtered by Saudi Arabia using US military hardware. Tell that to the thousands of innocent people who had their lives cut short because the Trump administration set records in drone strikes.

you got solemani’s number or he busy with his 72virgins?
 
  • Like
Reactions: OUSOONER67
Please correct my hyperbolic numbers.
Typical Dan. He throws out ‘facts’ that has no basis in fact. When called out on it, he asks you to either prove or refute his made up ‘facts’.

I expect he’ll not return to the Gaza work permits topic either. He ignores actual facts that don’t fit his preconceived conclusions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EZ Reyes
Typical Dan. He throws out ‘facts’ that has no basis in fact. When called out on it, he asks you to either prove or refute his made up ‘facts’.

I expect he’ll not return to the Gaza work permits topic either. He ignores actual facts that don’t fit his preconceived conclusions.
When one "throws out 'facts' that have no basis in fact" and is subsequently"called out on it" what is the proper response if it is not to ask for the truth from the person calling him out for his erroneous "facts?" I'm sorry, I don't know what you're talking about vis a vis work permits. I'd ask you to clarify, but apparently I'm not supposed to.
 
When one "throws out 'facts' that have no basis in fact" and is subsequently"called out on it" what is the proper response if it is not to ask for the truth from the person calling him out for his erroneous "facts?" I'm sorry, I don't know what you're talking about vis a vis work permits. I'd ask you to clarify, but apparently I'm not supposed to.
Ummm. How about doing a bit of research ahead of the post and cite where you got your information instead of talking out your ass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 100TonsofOrangeFury
When one "throws out 'facts' that have no basis in fact" and is subsequently"called out on it" what is the proper response if it is not to ask for the truth from the person calling him out for his erroneous "facts?" I'm sorry, I don't know what you're talking about vis a vis work permits. I'd ask you to clarify, but apparently I'm not supposed to.
Dan pretends he doesn't understand how this all works.

A sad effort.
 
Ummm. How about doing a bit of research ahead of the post and cite where you got your information instead of talking out your ass.
Okay, that's a fair demand, I should cite chapter and verse where I have gotten my information. But it seems to me that when a person "calls me out for incorrect facts" he should abide by the same guidelines and cite his facts and where his research has come from.
 
Okay, that's a fair demand, I should cite chapter and verse where I have gotten my information. But it seems to me that when a person "calls me out for incorrect facts" he should abide by the same guidelines and cite his facts and where his research has come from.
Ummm no. It’s up to you to prove your point. Do the research first and provide the link to the source. Just like in high school English when you cite your references. Same as in high school debate.
 
Dan pretends he doesn't understand how this all works.

A sad effort.
No pretense needed. If my "facts" are nothing more than hyperbole as you say it is, it is incumbant upon you to correct the record. Otherwise one is left with the conclusion that maybe you are not sure what you're talking about.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: EZ Reyes
Ummm no. It’s up to you to prove your point. Do the research first and provide the link to the source. Just like in high school English when you cite your references. Same as in high school debate.
Here’s a 2 second Google search on Saudi Arabia/Yemen. I’m much too lazy to look any further.


And here’s a 2 second Google search on drone strikes. The Trump administration use of drones comes right after it talks about Obama’s use. I confess I’m a little surprised you challenge this, it was talked about at great length during Trump’s tenure.


 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ostatedchi
Here’s a 2 second Google search on Saudi Arabia/Yemen. I’m much too lazy to look any further.

Yup...you're fuggin' lazy alright.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ostatedchi
No pretense needed. If my "facts" are nothing more than hyperbole as you say it is, it is incumbant upon you to correct the record. Otherwise one is left with the conclusion that maybe you are not sure what you're talking about.
I hope you know how stupid you sound. Every debate coach in the world would flunk you.
 
We are all laughing at you right now. You are really bad at this.
You and @my_2cents laughing at me. What a world we live in. Fortunately for me I don't care what you think of me any more than you care what I think of you. But for the record I think you're a smart guy if not a little quick to anger.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT