ADVERTISEMENT

TAX HYPOCRITES

Haha...nice try. Judging from your posts the duration of the Trumpocracy thus far, one could be sufficiently worried you’re dipping into the company supply
Back to the ellipse and haha/lol. Must be a relief to not have to pretend anymore.

Speaking of pretend, are you still stalking teenaged boys on Twitter?
 
Yet it’s still spouted like the conservative gospel on here...along with the Daily Wire, Daily Caller, Breitbart, National Review, Washington Examiner, the Drudge Report, Gateway Pundit, etc.
Because WaPo, CNN, ABC, NBC, NY Times, Slate, Vox, Think Progress, Mother Jones, Salon, Politico, BuzzFeed, HuffPo, The Economist, Daily Kos, Daily Beast, etc are so much better...

:rolleyes:
 
I see people bash FOX news as right wing propaganda.

Please give me a quick list of all the things that are lies that have aired on that network.

I'll going to count my $2500 in insurance savings while I wait.

Roy Moore “forgery”, Kate Steinle, Comey files. Keep going?
 
Back to the ellipse and haha/lol. Must be a relief to not have to pretend anymore.

Speaking of pretend, are you still stalking teenaged boys on Twitter?

If you equate retweeting about recruiting on Twitter to “stalking”, then yes...me and tens of millions of college football fans. Not the ultimate reach there or anything, Medic. Haha wow.
 
Because WaPo, CNN, ABC, NBC, NY Times, Slate, Vox, Think Progress, Mother Jones, Salon, Politico, BuzzFeed, HuffPo, The Economist, Daily Kos, Daily Beast, etc are so much better...

:rolleyes:


Just checked...and...yup...zero awards for journalism for Fox News. Zero, zip - not a one. Not even for live breaking news events lol. The Washington Post singlehandedly brought down a crooked Republican administration...for...gasp...influencing Democratic elections.

Almost as if history repeats itself...weird.
 
Just checked...and...yup...zero awards for journalism for Fox News. Zero, zip - not a one. Not even for live breaking news events lol. The Washington Post singlehandedly brought down a crooked Republican administration...for...gasp...influencing Democratic elections.

Almost as if history repeats itself...weird.
So getting an award from organizations who are more biased and left wing than even the MSM is the standard you think makes an organization legit?
 
If you equate retweeting about recruiting on Twitter to “stalking”, then yes...me and tens of millions of college football fans. Not the ultimate reach there or anything, Medic. Haha wow.
Player Performance Specialist... haha wow indeed. Hopefully you don't put yourself out there as some sort of expert help anymore. That was freakin creepy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
You asserting the Pulitzer is liberal biased?
The Pulitzer can't be won by Fox. Or CNN. Or MSNBC. It doesn't provide awards for broadcast work. But Fox also hasn't won any Pulitzer type awards for broadcast work either. I don't care much about awards so the why isn't something I waste my time on.
 
OMG! LMAO!

One person who isn't a reporter but a commentator talked about those two guys.

Those are your examples. Two issues most people never heard of?

At least you could do is give an example like Trump coluded with Wikileaks and then have to apologize for making it up. Or you could point out how Mueller is going after Trump's financial records but then admit it's not true.

Something like that, something every reporter on the network repeated but was a lie.

FrankEaton likes this. :rolleyes:

Lol.

What a cheerleader.

You don’t even deny it was a lie. You just try to move the goal posts of your challenge. I’m starting to think you might be developmentally challenged in the whole intellectual arena there hoss.

You asked for a Fox lie...not a lie that every reporter repeated. The channel reported on it more than once...as a news story....and had to withdraw it. You’re right...not every reporter repeated it (of course the same is true for your claimed lies)....probably because this one was such an obvious red herring that only the most gullible bit (including YOU...it should be pointed out).

No one heard about it? *face palm gif*....a multi-page thread here, reported more than once on a national broadcast, yeah... Seth Rich/KimDotCom....never heard of it. :rolleyes:

But yeah okay.....keep your nose firmly in Beloved Leader’s crotch.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
Looking through the various new tax calculators. Due to the new standard deduction for married filing jointly, taxable income doesn't even begin until $24,001. If that couple has the standard 2 kids, they will have $0 tax liability up to a net income of $60,500 due to the standard deduction and the increased child credit. Tax liability at $60,500 is $3,999 and is offest by $4,000 child credit.

Under existing, that same married couple with 2 kids with $60,500 in income has a tax liability of $3,022. Under existing, a tax liability occurs down to $40,350.

Here's one up to date one I messed with. It has a link to their 2017 calculator.

https://www.calcxml.com/calculators/trump-tax-reform-calculator


When I get home I'll post a link to one calculator I found that compares new and existing and I believe it also includes the fully refundable part of the child tax credit as well. That gives parents below the threshold of tax liability up to $1,400 additional in their refund.
@davidallen, the calculator in the link is the one I saw on desktop. The mobile version looks somewhat different.

There's quite a few others that have popped up to mess around with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
@davidallen, the calculator in the link is the one I saw on desktop. The mobile version looks somewhat different.

There's quite a few others that have popped up to mess around with.
Will give it a look tonight. The first one I did showed a 15k savings for me, 200 increase for my eldest... That one was based on the WH proposal so who knows how much has changed.
 
Okay, everyone should admit that headline wins this thread.

The beginning of the article is epic....



image.jpg
 
Will give it a look tonight. The first one I did showed a 15k savings for me, 200 increase for my eldest... That one was based on the WH proposal so who knows how much has changed.
Right on. The one I linked is up to date on the latest bill version.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT