ADVERTISEMENT

Tariffs Continued

CSCOTTOSUPOKES

Heisman Candidate
Dec 16, 2017
7,280
874
113
200 billion more in Chinese imports in response to their 34 billion retaliation to our 34 billion.

Trade war officially in progress.

Dow futures down 1% heading into tomorrow. Recent gains soon to shit a brick.


#MAGA #winning
 
Just offhand, have any of the tarrifs promised against China actually taken effect yet? I know their's have, but didn't think our first batch took effect till next week, and IF this $200B comes to fruition, it would be August or September before they'd actually kick off.

BTW, as a Lib, why are you against tarriffs? At the end of the day, they are just another (non-progressive) tax mechanism that's only targeted on imported goods. It seems strange to me that tarriffs that raise the cost of an aluminum can by 1 cent are life threatening, yet tax relief that returns $100s per month to the entire working class is "crumbs" and should be repealed. At the end of the day, whether you cause prices to rise (via tariffs) or you reduce the total amount a consumer can spend (via higher taxes) the net effect to the consumer (reduced buying power) is the same. Yet Libs rail against one and happily cheer (advocate?) for the other.
 
Just offhand, have any of the tarrifs promised against China actually taken effect yet? I know their's have, but didn't think our first batch took effect till next week, and IF this $200B comes to fruition, it would be August or September before they'd actually kick off.

BTW, as a Lib, why are you against tarriffs? At the end of the day, they are just another (non-progressive) tax mechanism that's only targeted on imported goods. It seems strange to me that tarriffs that raise the cost of an aluminum can by 1 cent are life threatening, yet tax relief that returns $100s per month to the entire working class is "crumbs" and should be repealed. At the end of the day, whether you cause prices to rise (via tariffs) or you reduce the total amount a consumer can spend (via higher taxes) the net effect to the consumer (reduced buying power) is the same. Yet Libs rail against one and happily cheer (advocate?) for the other.
Libs rail because Trump is involved. Had Obama done these same things the libs would have cheered wildly and their sycophants would have asked, "why do you hate tax cuts and reducing trade imbalances?".
 
Libs rail because Trump is involved. Had Obama done these same things the libs would have cheered wildly and their sycophants would have asked, "why do you hate tax cuts and reducing trade imbalances?".
Hell, Trump and Bernie are pretty close on this. If Bernie were pres, the media and libs would be talking about how we finally had a president looking out for America.
 
Just offhand, have any of the tarrifs promised against China actually taken effect yet? I know their's have, but didn't think our first batch took effect till next week, and IF this $200B comes to fruition, it would be August or September before they'd actually kick off.

BTW, as a Lib, why are you against tarriffs? At the end of the day, they are just another (non-progressive) tax mechanism that's only targeted on imported goods. It seems strange to me that tarriffs that raise the cost of an aluminum can by 1 cent are life threatening, yet tax relief that returns $100s per month to the entire working class is "crumbs" and should be repealed. At the end of the day, whether you cause prices to rise (via tariffs) or you reduce the total amount a consumer can spend (via higher taxes) the net effect to the consumer (reduced buying power) is the same. Yet Libs rail against one and happily cheer (advocate?) for the other.

https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/301/2018-0026 China FRN 7-10-2018_0.pdf?mod=article_inline
 
Libs rail because Trump is involved. Had Obama done these same things the libs would have cheered wildly and their sycophants would have asked, "why do you hate tax cuts and reducing trade imbalances?".
I think you are exactly right! And by the same token virtually every conservative leaning poster on this board that today applaud Trump’s tariffs would be screaming bloody murder that Hillary was abandoning free markets, that it is an unfair tax on consumers.
 
I think you are exactly right! And by the same token virtually every conservative leaning poster on this board that today applaud Trump’s tariffs would be screaming bloody murder that Hillary was abandoning free markets, that it is an unfair tax on consumers.
I wouldn't if Hildebitch did the same. You have to get to fair trade before you move on to free trade.
 
200 billion more in Chinese imports in response to their 34 billion retaliation to our 34 billion.

Trade war officially in progress.

Dow futures down 1% heading into tomorrow. Recent gains soon to shit a brick.


#MAGA #winning
And...right back up again at start of trade today. Watching daily moves and hoping for the worst is a pretty awful way to spend your day.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT