all of it to the highest bidder
the dude is a financial black hole
this is nothing short of treason from dws on down.
like i said dws is a used up cocoa beach stripper
Still think Dems don't have anything to hide? (updated)
- Thread starter Headhunter
- Start date
all of it to the highest bidder
the dude is a financial black hole
this is nothing short of treason from dws on down.
like i said dws is a used up cocoa beach stripper
Looks like the Mooch agrees with me:
He told CNN that he had interviewed most of the assistants to the president and people working on the communications team. "What the president and I would like to tell everyone, we have a very, very good idea who the senior leakers in the White House are."
Lots of leaks are not originating from the Whitehouse. The intelligence agencies are like submarines with screen doors.
So there could be more than one source and we both could be right....
I tend to agree.
But I express my belief in terms of possibilities while you express yours as absolute certainties.
My thoughts are that wouldn't first start with assuming all of it is true (as you asked me to do).
I would start with trying to confirm whether the claims were true from a perspective of high doubt in the accuracy of anything randomly posted by an obvious partisan on twitter.
That's just me though.
I agree. But unfortunately, the media outside of those "partisons on twitter" refuse to cover this. That's the problem with having the DNC controlling the major media outlets. I have no choice but to get this story from those partisan sources.
I think this is where our news (especially twitter news folks) is getting derailed and taking people with blinders on with them with out a fight.
- If it helps my side, I am want to be the first to get this story out there, even though the facts may be a little blurry.
- If it hurts my side, I am not going to post it without diving deep into the facts but I am going to slam those that do post it because partisanship.
Sure you do.
It would take work and time to verify the allegations made in those partisan stories. Some of them you wouldn't be able to verify (like who exactly "overseeing" the Awan investigation....a completely wobbly term if you understand how DOJ actually works as there may be many, zero, or one AUSA overseeing an FBI/DOJ investigation).
Or you could just come to the conclusion that the federal government at all levels and on all THREE sides (Republicans, Democrats, and "Trumpers") is incredibly incestuous and corrupt, no one is really interested in draining the swamp and anything said about corruption from any of the three camps likely has at least a small element of truth to it.....like I pretty much have.
I will warn you in advance though...that is a cynical and kinda depressing worldview.
I agree. I am on record noting the deep bias of MSM and doubting all "confidential" sources/leaks.
NZ
Steven Wasserman
Assistant US Attorney at United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia
Washington D.C. Metro Area
does that mean he's prosecuting
the case?
no...
Only you can determine your level of confidence in your opinions.
Very few things are absolute but the leaks are coming from somewhere and I am confident that I'm correct on where a lot of them are coming from. But I do enjoy how wrong most people on the left have been about all things Trump.
As I said earlier, you state your level of confidence in your opinion as absolute truths and certainties. To each his own I guess.
