Still think Dems don't have anything to hide? (updated)

[Headhunter]

What really got me is the guy who is being investigated for some very serious crimes is still on Debbie's payroll! Debbie MAY start cooperating with the investigation. I repeat MAY.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/19/wasserman-schultz-may-start-cooperating-with-house-hacking-probe/

 

[GoPokes43]

Good grief. Congressional members above the law.

 

[Rdcldad]

imagine if this dude was of japanese or german decent during ww2 or of russian decent during the cold war

the congresswoman no doubt would be tried for treason

the awan brothers hung as spies


this country needs to be great again and these turds are floating in our punchbowl

 

[NZ Poke]

The fact that the Dems don't want voter fraud investigated speaks for itself.

Listen to this clip of the NYC election commissioner explaining how voter fraud occurs in his own district.

Imagine the corporate media (and Dem politician) reaction if the election commissioner said that Republicans are being bused around and voting twice etc





This clip would have been the biggest scandal in American history (literally) if Republicans were said to be involved in voter fraud.


Trump won the election by a much bigger margin than reported (and probably won the popular vote) --- but Dem cheating closed the gap.

All the polls of Hillary being ahead were completely fake --- she couldn't even fill up high school gyms.

 

[OKSTATE1]

On voter fraud, just announce prior to the next election ICE agents will be confirming legal status at each voting station. Will not even need to do it, just announcing it would be enough to keep most of the illegals away.

 

[Headhunter]

Found this new article interesting, This quote says it all.

“If Donald Trump and the Republicans had hired foreign nationals to be their top IT guys and somehow their congressional files had been compromised, this would have been all over the news,” he continued.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/23/e...-drives-from-wasserman-schultz-it-aides-home/

 

[NZ Poke]

For anyone who isn't familiar with the Awan Brothers.

(Whom @Headhunter posted about)

 

[Headhunter]

Interesting, not one comment from our very reliable Dem/Liberal defenders pointing at our tinfoil hats.

 

[aix_xpert]

Don't forget, when the "Russians" hacked the DNC, the DNC refused to turn the server over to the FBI. They simply had their analysts write the report that 'evidenced' that the Russians were behind it. This doesn't get reported nearly enough, and at this time, is the only real 'evidence' that Russia intervened in our election. Everything else is 'hearsay' or speculation.

Can you imagine if this were a burglary and you told the police, you don't need to investigate, I know the Russian's did it. Would anyone take it seriously? Yet, that's exactly what we've done here.

 

[anon_xl72qcu5isp39]

 

[NZ Poke]

 

[aix_xpert]

View embedded media

This maybe true, but I still haven't seen them do anything that I haven't seen "the swamp" do for the past 20 years. Noone cared that the Dem admins let the Russian lawyer in, until she "colluded" with Trump. Noone seems to care that the same person met with a dozen different congressmen (Ds and Rs). Noone cared that a Ukranian was a senior member of Bernie's Campaign staff, and had been a member of Obama's staff previously. Noone cared that a Saudi Prince basically stated that he was financing Hillary's campaign. But its Trump, so "Russia, Russia, Russia". I'd like to see one shred of actual evidence of a wrong-doing. And when we find it, I want that same standard of wrong-doing applied to EVERY SINGLE WASHINGTON politician. Heck, I'm still waiting to see one piece of evidence that Russia actually interfered in our election. Without this, I'm not sure you will ever get to whether or not Trump colluded to get Russia to do it.

 

[GoPokes43]

Found this new article interesting, This quote says it all.

“If Donald Trump and the Republicans had hired foreign nationals to be their top IT guys and somehow their congressional files had been compromised, this would have been all over the news,” he continued.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/23/e...-drives-from-wasserman-schultz-it-aides-home/

Unreal. That Marine from the article is gutsy for telling the story. Hope he is careful and not getting himself in danger.

 

[anon_xl72qcu5isp39]

Heck, I'm still waiting to see one piece of evidence that Russia actually interfered in our election.

Such as? You're employing medic-thought. You want proof that Russia interfered, but an email chain from Little Don memorializing a meeting to receive content from the Russian government doesn't count. An assessment from an intelligence agency (beginning in the summer of 2016!) doesn't count. The transcript from Ryan and McCarthy saying Russia was doing it and detailing who would take their money doesn't count. Good lord, just be intellectually honest and say you don't care, the important thing is that Trump won.

 

[Headhunter]

A couple of introductory meetings is not collusion, even if they thought they might get some dirt.

The Ryan McCarthy conversation was a big joke no one but idiot Trump haters think was serious. You've got nothing.

 

[Medic007]

Such as? You're employing medic-thought. You want proof that Russia interfered, but an email chain from Little Don memorializing a meeting to receive content from the Russian government doesn't count. An assessment from an intelligence agency (beginning in the summer of 2016!) doesn't count. The transcript from Ryan and McCarthy saying Russia was doing it and detailing who would take their money doesn't count. Good lord, just be intellectually honest and say you don't care, the important thing is that Trump won.

Man, with all of this way scary Russia collusion stuff out there, why has the DNC deliberately refused access to their hardware? You'd think that the DNC would have been beating down the doors of every law enforcement and intelligence agency in the federal government to get that shit figured out pronto. Unless maybe they have something to hide. I wonder what they would be wanting to hide?

 

[aix_xpert]

Such as? You're employing medic-thought. You want proof that Russia interfered, but an email chain from Little Don memorializing a meeting to receive content from the Russian government doesn't count. An assessment from an intelligence agency (beginning in the summer of 2016!) doesn't count. The transcript from Ryan and McCarthy saying Russia was doing it and detailing who would take their money doesn't count. Good lord, just be intellectually honest and say you don't care, the important thing is that Trump won.

No, simply meeting with a Russian does not count. Otherwise every person in Washington is guilty. I've seen the photos. The lady was everywhere and even authorized into the US by the Obama admin. Sorry I do need more than that.

Which intelligence agency. The actual assessment was extremely generic and could have been applied to any industrialized nation. Yes, Russia probed our defenses. So did Germany. So did the UK. By the way, we did the same to them. The only item of note in that report was the reported Russia hacking of the DNC servers which was given to them from a "trusted" 3rd party. But I'm sorry, the DNC's personal IT consuntant firm is not a "trusted" 3rd party to me. So yes, I need a little more than that. Can none of our 17 (?) intelligence agencies name one actually Russian lead attack?

And the last was a joke. Just like the the comment that Trump said: "Maybe Russia can find the 33,000 deleted emails". I'm sorry but I need more than hyperbole statements as evidence of collusion.

You got anything else of real substance?

 

[aix_xpert]

Man, with all of this way scary Russia collusion stuff out there, why has the DNC deliberately refused access to their hardware? You'd think that the DNC would have been beating down the doors of every law enforcement and intelligence agency in the federal government to get that shit figured out pronto. Unless maybe they have something to hide. I wonder what they would be wanting to hide?

I draw two possible conclusions as to why the DNC would refuse access to the intelligence agencies, and unfortunately both are plausible:

1) It wasn't the Russians but really Seth Richards (I think thats the name) or another internal person who performed this. Obviously Wikileaks has promoted this narrative, and the untimely death of Seth Richards will likely leave this as forever unconfirmed.

2) They know the intelligence agencies are just as likely to leak anything nefarious as anyone else is, and thus they don't want to risk that exposure. Unfortunately, this can't be downplayed. As has been shown, even the head of the FBI wasn't against leaking investigation details to the press. If the FBI head will do it (without consequence I might add) then why wouldn't any other member of the agency.

I'm open to other possible conclusions as to why the DNC would explicitly refuse FBI access to a server that was supposedly hacked by a foreign government. Sys, why do you think the DNC didn't turn over the server?

 

[anon_xl72qcu5isp39]

I draw two possible conclusions as to why the DNC would refuse access to the intelligence agencies, and unfortunately both are plausible:

1) It wasn't the Russians but really Seth Richards (I think thats the name) or another internal person who performed this. Obviously Wikileaks has promoted this narrative, and the untimely death of Seth Richards will likely leave this as forever unconfirmed.

2) They know the intelligence agencies are just as likely to leak anything nefarious as anyone else is, and thus they don't want to risk that exposure. Unfortunately, this can't be downplayed. As has been shown, even the head of the FBI wasn't against leaking investigation details to the press. If the FBI head will do it (without consequence I might add) then why wouldn't any other member of the agency.

I'm open to other possible conclusions as to why the DNC would explicitly refuse FBI access to a server that was supposedly hacked by a foreign government. Sys, why do you think the DNC didn't turn over the server?

 

[aix_xpert]

I guess I deserve this. Every time I try to have an intelligent conversation with you this is the crap that comes back. I guess I only have myself to blame. Its not like being moronic is new behavior for you. Don't bother replying...you are now the sole member of my ignore list.

 

[anon_xl72qcu5isp39]

I guess I deserve this. Every time I try to have an intelligent conversation with you this is the crap that comes back. I guess I only have myself to blame. Its not like being moronic is new behavior for you. Don't bother replying...you are now the sole member of my ignore list.

Good. You haven't had an intelligent conversation on here that I've seen. Don't respond to my posts with your sillyass mental gymnastics any more, zombie.

 

[Medic007]

Good. You haven't had an intelligent conversation on here that I've seen. Don't respond to my posts with your sillyass mental gymnastics any more, zombie.

Yes, we understand that asking you a direct question about your thoughts on the DNC refusing to give access to their hardware is mental gymnastics for you. I don't think anybody expected anything but your best routine in return...

 

[CBradSmith]

I guess I deserve this. Every time I try to have an intelligent conversation with you this is the crap that comes back. I guess I only have myself to blame. Its not like being moronic is new behavior for you. Don't bother replying...you are now the sole member of my ignore list.

You know, that's an interesting and pertinent take.

Most think the Ignore list is for making bad or disagreeable thoughts go away... "that hurts my feelers. Where's my mama's tit?"

But you see using it as a form of self governance.

You see the occasional lucidity that Sys flashes, and it gives you hope that maybe a true dialogue can be had. You engage. And just as Charlie Brown never can kick the football that Lucy is holding, you observe time and again that Sys is never able to see a conversation through to finality, even if it's to respect that you have a perspective worthwhile (presumably as does he) and you part ways respecting the other.

I like that man. I think I'll join you.

 

[JimmyBob]

But you see using it as a form of self governance.

Bingo, plus it exercises one's mind filling in the blanks with the ridiculous crap being responded to by sensible posters.

 

[CBradSmith]

Bingo, plus it exercises one's mind filling in the blanks with the ridiculous crap being responded to by sensible posters.

Lol. I bet that can be a hoot!

 

[Medic007]

Bingo, plus it exercises one's mind filling in the blanks with the ridiculous crap being responded to by sensible posters.

Like Mad Libs?

 

[Rdcldad]

ignore is a legit wonderful thing

 

[NZ Poke]

 

[JimmyBob]

Lol. I bet that can be a hoot!

The last thing I'd ever call it is a "Vulcan mind meld"!

 

[JimmyBob]

View embedded media

Wow! The Dems must all use the same IT guy:

 

[Medic007]

View embedded media

This story only appears on small right wing outlets. The story has some pretty sensational quotes from "a tenant" renting a house from the IT guy. Those quotes sound really, really made up. Not refuting the claim, but I'm not buying it at this point either.

 

[NZ Poke]

This story only appears on small right wing outlets. The story has some pretty sensational quotes from "a tenant" renting a house from the IT guy. Those quotes sound really, really made up. Not refuting the claim, but I'm not buying it at this point either.

Fair point.

Meanwhile.....

 

[NZ Poke]

 

[NZ Poke]

Remember this guy?

 

[MegaPoke]

http://www.investors.com/politics/e...trump-not-hillary-targeted-for-investigation/

 

[NZ Poke]

Has anyone seen this guy?!

He posts videos daily, he's been on a never ending daily search for the answers.

He said today that 150 congressmen may have received blackberries through the Awan Bros!! Watch!!!

 

[Medic007]

http://www.investors.com/politics/e...trump-not-hillary-targeted-for-investigation/

Interesting.

 

[aix_xpert]

You know, that's an interesting and pertinent take.

Most think the Ignore list is for making bad or disagreeable thoughts go away... "that hurts my feelers. Where's my mama's tit?"

But you see using it as a form of self governance.

You see the occasional lucidity that Sys flashes, and it gives you hope that maybe a true dialogue can be had. You engage. And just as Charlie Brown never can kick the football that Lucy is holding, you observe time and again that Sys is never able to see a conversation through to finality, even if it's to respect that you have a perspective worthwhile (presumably as does he) and you part ways respecting the other.

I like that man. I think I'll join you.

This is basically correct. He'll post legitimate questions, but then when you provide legitimate responses, he's not willing to discuss those responses but rather dive into some other tangent or worse yet, post some completely unrelated meme (as he did here).

 

[Headhunter]

This story only appears on small right wing outlets. The story has some pretty sensational quotes from "a tenant" renting a house from the IT guy. Those quotes sound really, really made up. Not refuting the claim, but I'm not buying it at this point either.

Breitbart and Daily Caller are "small" right wing sites? They get more traffic than many of the MSM sites.

Do you have the same problem with all the anonymous sources regarding Trump and Russia? You don't believe the FBI seized smashed hard drives?

 

[Medic007]

Breitbart and Daily Caller are "small" right wing sites? They get more traffic than many of the MSM sites.

I'm not familiar with Daily Caller or their traffic. I didn't see it on Breitbart.

Do you have the same problem with all the anonymous sources regarding Trump and Russia?

Yes.

You don't believe the FBI seized smashed hard drives

What I believe is that anonymous sources have said the FBI seized smashed hard drives. Is it possible they did? Yep. Is it possible it's bullshit like other information from anonymous sources has turned out to be? Yep. What I don't refute is that the DWS IT folks that she still hasn't fired have likely done some serious criminal stuff.