In your mind palace how exactly does that work? What three large cities would rule you?
Speaking of Waging War Against Time-tested American Institutions...
- Thread starter Marshal Jim Duncan
- Start date
I know lets derail another thread about splitting hairs over left right and center!
This is the dumbest hill you've picked to die on yet. It's self evident how that works, and which 3 cities I'm referring to.
It's your quote. Just asking who you think the righteous right in particular are. Which ones are righteous?
the NPVIC only needs 90 more electoral votes to go into effect. States with a total of 158 electoral votes have legislation pending.
Reasonable path to 90:
Oregon 7
Nevada 6
Arizona 11
Minnesota 10
New Hampshire 4
Maine 4
North Carolina 15
Georgia 16
Florida 29
LA Chicago NYC?
Including suburbs that amounts to about 13% of the US population and that's if you could get all of those people to vote the same way.
It is contextually defined right there in my post, it is the people who would never do anything like use all legal means at it is disposal to gain and exercise power.
It would be a curious court case to see the lawsuit against a state for voter disenfranchisement in a state that went for one candidate but due to the national popular vote their electoral delegates went to the opposite party.
The voter disenfranchisement case would be pretty hard to make while defending a system that makes a vote for a republican in a democrat majority state worth 0.
I dated a flaming feminist many moons ago when feminism was in its infancy. She was of the opinion that being rammed doggie style was an act of dominance by men over women with similar overtones to rape and oppression. But, she surely loved being rammed that way.
Not farting loudly enough contributes to oppression and rape culture? I smell some leftist cracks screaming for fart equality legislation soon.
I think it's called "let sleeping dogs lie"; hell, the next thing you know he'll be posting pics!
No Anthony Weiner here.I think it's called "let sleeping dogs lie"; hell, the next thing you know he'll be posting pics!
Without weighing in on the underlying debate re: electoral college, nothing in the Constitution requires electoral college electors to vote in faith/alignment with the nominated or voted upon candidates within the state. There have been something like nearly 200 “faithless” Electoral College delegates through the years.
The Supreme Court has held that a state can empower parties to require formal pledges to vote for nominated candidates, but 20 states have no such law. The penalty in the states (and DC) which have such formal requirements are all relatively minor.
The 2016 election had 10 such faithless electors. 7 of them were replaced per state law in faithless elector situations. 3 votes were actually cast in the EC for candidates other than DT or HC and counted.
States have wide latitude in determining by statute how EC delegates are to vote and penalties or replacement for those that do not comply with the state law.
Ostatedchi, IMHO exactly why the liberals scum want illegals and 16 year olds to vote. Yea now it just local elections, then it would be statewide elections. One group is so insufficiently educated to understand much of anything except sports and screwing and the other grows an extra 6 arms for government handouts since they believe the government should be a cradle to grave organization.
I believe the voting stunts they are trying to pull are a direct but distant approach to deny 2/3 states ratifications of amendments put forth at a future states convention, to say create term limits, deny birth right citizenship etc etc.
Last edited:
