www.breitbart.com
Seriously doubt that any “highly sensitive” documents would be on actual paper in the 21st century. Hell, I can’t even get AT&T to send me a bill on paper.As painful as it is for the Trump loyalists to admit.
Ann Coulter: The Trump Indictment
Any Republican who thought he could get away with doing something illegal because Democrats did it first is too stupid to be our champion, much less the Republican nominee for president.
Ms. Coulter's point is the overzealous indictment is evidence that the process is biased against team Republican in general and Donald Trump in particular, of which is something Donald Trump should have been keenly aware. That he is caught on tape bragging about his criminal misdeed should convince people that he is not fit to be our leader. In my case it has nothing to do with hating him. I don't hate him. I don't like him, but my dislike is a far cry from hatred. I spent years defending him against the bogus charges that were constantly thrown his way. This does not appear to be a bogus charge. He will get his day in court and hopefully justice will be served. But as Coulter points out deflecting and whining about the double standard is not an appropriate defense.I have no idea how this case works out but those that have already presumed Trump's guilt based on a overzealous indictment make me laugh. People need to put their politics and hatred aside and look at the process the government used to make this case. If the government did what Trump and his attorneys says they did, it should throw up huge concerns from everyone.
Trump's indictment is not the slam dunk case liberal media believes it is
The case against former President Donald Trump over his handling of classified documents is not open and shut. The Presidential Records Act is at the heart of Trump's potential defense.www.foxnews.com
I still have a problem with the wording "marked classified". This implies that the document was unclassified but simply marked classified, which can occur. It would be in line with the Trump "declassified it" narrative as well.I have no idea how this case works out but those that have already presumed Trump's guilt based on a overzealous indictment make me laugh. People need to put their politics and hatred aside and look at the process the government used to make this case. If the government did what Trump and his attorneys says they did, it should throw up huge concerns from everyone.
Trump's indictment is not the slam dunk case liberal media believes it is
The case against former President Donald Trump over his handling of classified documents is not open and shut. The Presidential Records Act is at the heart of Trump's potential defense.
Pointing out the double standard is not a legal defense Dan, it's purely for politics just as the indictment was political. It will be interesting to see how much of the evidence released in the indictment is ruled inadmissible in court.
Should we expect shit britches "crime" be pushed to the side?
Bring me up to speed. I don't remember Bill Clinton being indicted over Whitewater. But I'm an old man and my memory is bad. Did Bill Clinon get indicted over Whitewater and I just don't remember?
I agree with you that the whole thing is political theater. But Trump stepped in it big time when he bragged on tape that he knowingly committed a crime. The "political line" got crossed because of his big mouth. I don't think he would have been indicted absent his "confession."
The story isn't going away anytime soon. That being said I have no confidence in a Garland DOJ to do anything about it. Every time Biden will get highlighted, they will indict Trump and have an alien spotting. Which is great for the legacy media to just ignore the Biden (Obama) scandal.
Papa joe smiles upon you. Kamala even squirted. I take it you like yer shepherd's stick. 🤣
What was "overzealous" about the indictment?
Why don't you put your politics aside for once?
lol
“As president, I could have declassified, but now I can’t"
Except Trump's own words, as cited in the indictment, clearly work against Trump's own poor legal "declassified it" narrative.
They have no bearing on it. He can say what ever, but does that actualy prove guilt? No it does not. He very well have ment it to be exactly what you think it is and it still doens't prove guilt. On top of that he may have just stumbled into declassifying it without him even knowing it, simply by taking them with him. Again, ask Bill how that works.
Hillary thanks her lucky stars everyday I'm sure. Bitch should lay back in the shadows imo.
So have you now changed your mind Dan?
Her Benghazi mess is enough for her to sit the **** down and shut the **** up before we throw your ass into jail.
Wrong. His own words absolutely do have a bearing on it.
It helps proves guilt, absolutely. It is one piece of evidence among all the other pieces of evidence cited in the indictment.
Hillary, Bill, Borack and Michelle share nightly suppers I'm sure. Joe and Jill sparingly when joe can walk on his own.
Look at you, being all political. Wanting to throw into jail a political opponent. How dare you!🤔🤣
My opinion from day one has been the entire prosecution has been politically motivated, and when Trump admitted on tape he knowingly committed a crime he deserved to be indicted. There was a thread a few days ago in which I told both you and Bearecat that both could be true at the same time. Now go find someone else to argue with. You bore me.
But both can't be true. One cannot believe this "whole" thing is political theater and also believe that Trump deserved to be charged apart from politics and according to the rule of law.
I could go on but the slow will be coming by soon to tell me how I'm wrong because you know....I'm wrong.
Peanut butter on waffles is amazing. You should give it a try. Yer moms musta neglected you.
So this is all you are left with, huh? lol
Saying the prosecution is politically motivated is not "defending" Trump. It's looking at reality. Trump screwed up royally by shooting off his big mouth. I do not think they would have indicted absent his "confession." He will get his day in court, as he should. It will be interesting to see how he is defended. I'm sure no matter what the verdict one side or the other will be furious.
That's just stupidity on display. Of course Trump will have a defense and it will be vigorous and sensible. The only question will be if the jury accepts it.
