ADVERTISEMENT

Seth Rich was dnc whistleblower, not Russian hack.

Left side:

C8Dc47mVMAQ8brd.jpg






 
the last two days cbs gave the hildebitch airtime commenting on

1 why she lost the election
2 syrian middle strikes

cbs efforts to keep the clinton name relevant is utterly amazing and despicable

i hope this story gets the legs it deserves

rip vince foster
 
I'll go ahead and again point out the peculiar thing about the DNC and the Russian "hack." The "investigation" of the "hack" was conducted by Crowdstrike, a company hired by the DNC that also has strong ties to the DNC and Clinton. The information given to the intelligence community has come under scrutiny for bias and for possibly containing fabricated information. The DNC refused to allow the FBI to conduct any forensics on their equipment. Weird they would block the FBI and their expertise from examining their stuff.

I normally ignore this type of stuff, but in this case, it does make me wonder if the DNC went to great lengths to cover up an internal "hack" of their information.

http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/03...ay-have-fabricated-russia-hacking-in-ukraine/

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...s-hillary-clinton-ukrainian-billionaire-and-g

https://www.google.com/amp/constitu...ments-wrongfully-blaming-russians-hacking/amp

http://www.investors.com/politics/e...m-that-russia-hacked-the-dnc-just-fall-apart/
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
Nope.
Snopes is real. Your sources are fake.

(See how easy that was).

Confirmation bias wins again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
Your lack of curiosity about things that challenge your own confirmation bias is funnier.

You don't know if this is legit and neither do I, but you've already declared it a funny conspiracy theory. C'mon man.
Some seek shelter in what the corporate media feeds them. Russian hacks, Trump collusion, no problems with Clinton email, etc. It's comfortable and doesn't deviate from the embedded politics of the Party. That's cool.

Others prefer to see what all is out there and see what makes sense and what doesn't from a logical perspective. Having things labeled as a conspiracy theory by an avid consumer of corporate media tells me things are uncomfortable in that group in regards to information being presented. Discomfort with information usually means somebody has scratched a scab off.
 
Been I know exactly what your talking about with conspiracy theories and all...I still don't believe we landed on the moon. It was filmed in the Atacama desert in Chile.

Exactly, because we all know that the earth is flat and any event that depicts it as a sphere is clearly part of the conspiracy being perpetrated by the ruling class for centuries now.
 
Comey just released a statement: "After learning of Mr. Rich providing documents to Wikileaks, Ms. Clinton and Mr. Podesta hired assasins to kill Mr Rich. However, there was never intent to rob Mr. Rich. Given this was technically a robbery, there will be no charges filed in this unfortunate mugging and misunderstanding."




Not my creation.
 
Last week you guys lapped up the theories of a occult-obsessed, nazi-sympathizing, pentagram wearing moron. Could you just cut to the chase and tell us which conservative sage is formulating your conspiracies this week?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Been Jammin
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT