Scooter can smear and lie to start the Iraq war after all!
- Thread starter anon_xl72qcu5isp39
- Start date
I'm sitting here, reading about the lil' cockroach Scooter Libby. He retaliated against a family that simply spoke the truth so he could have a war. He was convicted of crimes to start a war. As his involvement became known, he committed more and more crimes, told more lies.
Two successive GOP presidents have used their authority to protect him. Bush commuted his prison sentence, and Biff flat pardoned him. I can't think of a more shitty, immoral, corrupt course of conduct. I hope every night when he goes to sleep he sees all the dead bodies and blood he helped accomplish.
What a corrupt, immoral, dishonest, group of subhumans. I'll never understand why the Iraq war didn't result in about a dozen public executions of these war criminals. We're still paying for it. Here we are a generation later and the GOP is still making sure they minimize the few consequences that were felt by the war criminals.
Two successive GOP presidents have used their authority to protect him. Bush commuted his prison sentence, and Biff flat pardoned him. I can't think of a more shitty, immoral, corrupt course of conduct. I hope every night when he goes to sleep he sees all the dead bodies and blood he helped accomplish.
What a corrupt, immoral, dishonest, group of subhumans. I'll never understand why the Iraq war didn't result in about a dozen public executions of these war criminals. We're still paying for it. Here we are a generation later and the GOP is still making sure they minimize the few consequences that were felt by the war criminals.
The war had already occurred. Turns out he probably wasn't the leaker, but that doesn't excuse the crimes he committed.
Really? Let's review the crimes he was convicted of: one count of obstruction of justice, two counts of perjury, and one count of making false statements. Which one of those crimes started a war?
The crimes he committed stemmed from the lies he told.
I'm glad you used some paragraphs. It's just too bad your first paragraph is littered with hysterical and non-factual drama. You sure you're actually a lawyer? I guess I would expect the presence of a little "expertise" in your post. It reads like CowboyUp hijacked your computer.
I guess things aren’t clear to you. The gloves are off. The days of the rinos calling the shots are gone (or temporarily suspended). Trump isn’t playing by those rules anymore. Did your mom ever tell you not to stoop to someone’s level and take the high road? That’s gone it’s time to stoop, we are stooping. Trump climbed over the hog panel and laid down with the pigs and is now showing them how to get dirty.
Honestly if you ripped the liberals just a tad for their pardons and other moral faux pas we could have a conversation about this. Until then, I hope trump does become a fascist so we can actually get some good out of the title.
I’m curious, NZ. To what extent of their hunger for war to you attribute their Jewishness? What about their Jewishness made them so hawkish?
By all means, do some research and let everyone know your theories.
Before before anyone calls the article above "racist".....this is the newspaper.
Why avoid the question? I did not, and have never accused you of racism. You are suggesting it is their Jewishness that has made them the way they are. I’m asking what you think it is about their Jewishness that is responsible? If it is their Jewishness that makes them so militant, what explains anti-war Jews? How do you explain the opposing attitudes coming from the “same people?”By all means, do some research and let everyone know your theories.
Before before anyone calls the article above "racist".....this is the newspaper.
When did the gloves ever come off? Heard of watergate? Nixon tried to delay the Vietnam cease fire until he could take office. Were the gloves off then?
You're personalizing it -- and trying to manufacure words (thoughts) and assumptions that I didn't write.
Instead of trying to focus on me, you could do some research on the historical origins and intellectual founders of neoconservatism -- and their ideologies.
It's worth noting that many of the original neoconservatives were big fans of:
Setting aside your obvious anti-semitism, if you're inventorying the race and religion that enabled Iraq I submit the white protestants Bush and Cheney. Why no mention of their involvement or the other white protestants?
Nixon was one man with a lot of power and a few loyalists. He never had the strength of billions of dollars of media propaganda as a tool of his. The democrats are a criminal organization with unprecedented tentacles.
Wanna talk some jive? I'll talk some jive. Dems teach sunday school and help orphans. Republicans are pedophiles and thieves. Your turn.
I suppose you feel I am personalizing things. To be honest I’m not interested enough to do the research you suggest. I assume you have done the research and that is why you posted the memes. I repeat: you strongly suggest it is their Jewishness that leads these men to their war mentality. You obviously have an opinion about it. Why else would you suggest it? So my question to you remains: what is it about the Jewish religion that makes these men so hawkish? And if it IS caused by their Jewish religion, what explains anti-war Jews? I’m looking for YOUR opinion. No amount of research on neoconservative thought will lead me to YOUR opinion. The point is you may have a very valid take on the issue. But we’ll never know what it is if you continually avoid expressing your personal views.You're personalizing it -- and trying to manufacure words (thoughts) and assumptions that I didn't write.
Instead of trying to focus on me, you could do some research on the historical origins and intellectual founders of neoconservatism -- and their ideologies.
It's worth noting that many of the original neoconservatives were big fans of:
Dems sell guns to isis and let the man who knew about it get murdered by a mob. Republicans want to save millions of future democratic voters by restricting or outlawing abortions.
You're personalizing it -- and trying to manufacure words (thoughts) and assumptions that I didn't write.
Instead of trying to focus on me, you could do some research on the historical origins and intellectual founders of neoconservatism -- and their ideologies.
It's worth noting that many of the original neoconservatives were big fans of:
The old “I’m just posting this bullshit, not adopting it as my own” line...which just like everything you do now...is a sad little retread/repost/repeat of the same sad little narrative you’re being spoon fed.
He's a one trick pony. He posts his Nazi dogma, then, when asked about it, his response is always "feel free to do some research" and "this isn't my opinion, it is someone else's".
Completely transparent and disgusting.
