ADVERTISEMENT

Say What You Want About Donald Trump

LMAO. You ever stop to think what positives might come from these proposed tariffs? Of course not only what you can use to criticize Trump.
The more Democrats, the MSM and people like you attack Trump the more support he gets. That should tell you something.
What positives do the American consumers get when they're taxed another 10% for the products they buy? What is the positive for the half million people who will lose their jobs because of this policy? "The more ... you attack Trump the more support he gets. That should tell you something." What it tells me, in this instance at least, is there are people so blinded by loyalty to the man they support him no matter how idiotic is a policy he proposes. And as the author of the article says: this proposal is batshit insane. Maybe just once those who are loyal to Trump the very end ought to stop and assess some of the things for which he advocates and tell him to hit the brakes. He isn't an infallible deity, he's a man with some pretty stupid ideas on occasion.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: okcpokefan12
What positives do the American consumers get when they're taxed another 10% for the products they buy? What is the positive for the half million people who will lose their jobs because of this policy? "The more ... you attack Trump the more support he gets. That should tell you something." What it tells me, in this instance at least, is there are people so blinded by loyalty to the man they support him no matter how idiotic is a policy he proposes. And as the author of the article says: this proposal is batshit insane. Maybe just once those who are loyal to Trump the very end ought to stop and assess some of the things for which he advocates and tell him to hit the brakes. He isn't an infallible deity, he's a man with some pretty stupid ideas on occasion.

What happens to trade when China inevitably invades Taiwan?
 
What positives do the American consumers get when they're taxed another 10% for the products they buy? What is the positive for the half million people who will lose their jobs because of this policy? "The more ... you attack Trump the more support he gets. That should tell you something." What it tells me, in this instance at least, is there are people so blinded by loyalty to the man they support him no matter how idiotic is a policy he proposes. And as the author of the article says: this proposal is batshit insane. Maybe just once those who are loyal to Trump the very end ought to stop and assess some of the things for which he advocates and tell him to hit the brakes. He isn't an infallible deity, he's a man with some pretty stupid ideas on occasion.

Tell me you don’t get it without telling me you don’t get it.

Your random conflagration of utopian anarchist concepts with actual reality is the type of cognitive dissonance one would expect to cause an aneurism
 
What happens to trade when China inevitably invades Taiwan?
China is on the verge of economic collapse. There is much more to worry about than China invading Taiwan. But I suppose trade would be nonexistent since Biden has already said he'd send troops into the fray.
 
Tell me you don’t get it without telling me you don’t get it.

Your random conflagration of utopian anarchist concepts with actual reality is the type of cognitive dissonance one would expect to cause an aneurism
That's about as close to a non-answer as you could come up with. Real life politics is full of insurmountable screw-ups. This would be a huge one. But that's okay, if Trump wants it you need drop to your knees and kiss his ... ring.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: okcpokefan12
What positives do the American consumers get when they're taxed another 10% for the products they buy? What is the positive for the half million people who will lose their jobs because of this policy? "The more ... you attack Trump the more support he gets. That should tell you something." What it tells me, in this instance at least, is there are people so blinded by loyalty to the man they support him no matter how idiotic is a policy he proposes. And as the author of the article says: this proposal is batshit insane. Maybe just once those who are loyal to Trump the very end ought to stop and assess some of the things for which he advocates and tell him to hit the brakes. He isn't an infallible deity, he's a man with some pretty stupid ideas on occasion.
What happens when foreign goods become more expensive or of equal costs to American produced goods? What happens when the trade deficit is no longer a deficit or greatly reduced? What happens to jobs when it's cheaper or of equal cost to manufacture goods in the US instead of overseas? What happens to the middleclass when jobs are plentiful? What happens to taxes and the national debt when the US produces it's own goods? What happens to China's economy if they are no longer the manufacturing center of US goods? It's not good when we are sending hundreds of billions of dollars to other countries, many of whom are adversaries, to produce goods we can and should produce here in this country. Sorry but you will never convince me running hundreds of billions of dollars in trade deficit is in anyway good for this country.
What you fail to grasp is the attacks you make against Trump are seen as unfair, unfounded and are a direct result of merely not liking Trump's terrible personality. In other words there is little to no substance to your attacks. Please do not take this as me defending Trump as that is not what this is. What this is, is criticism of the ridiculous over the top attacks on Trump.
 
That's about as close to a non-answer as you could come up with. Real life politics is full of insurmountable screw-ups. This would be a huge one. But that's okay, if Trump wants it you need drop to your knees and kiss his ... ring.

I’m not a Trump fan Dan.

Your opposition to tariffs reads more like religious dogma than logic.
 
China is on the verge of economic collapse. There is much more to worry about than China invading Taiwan. But I suppose trade would be nonexistent since Biden has already said he'd send troops into the fray.

So we’ll need the manufacturing.

That wasn’t happening prior to the tariffs.

Your allegiance to this is no different than the Trump allegiance you rail about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
What happens when foreign goods become more expensive or of equal costs to American produced goods? What happens when the trade deficit is no longer a deficit or greatly reduced? What happens to jobs when it's cheaper or of equal cost to manufacture goods in the US instead of overseas? What happens to the middleclass when jobs are plentiful? What happens to taxes and the national debt when the US produces it's own goods? What happens to China's economy if they are no longer the manufacturing center of US goods? It's not good when we are sending hundreds of billions of dollars to other countries, many of whom are adversaries, to produce goods we can and should produce here in this country. Sorry but you will never convince me running hundreds of billions of dollars in trade deficit is in anyway good for this country.
What you fail to grasp is the attacks you make against Trump are seen as unfair, unfounded and are a direct result of merely not liking Trump's terrible personality. In other words there is little to no substance to your attacks. Please do not take this as me defending Trump as that is not what this is. What this is, is criticism of the ridiculous over the top attacks on Trump.
Tell me you read the links I posted on this thread, or even one of them, or even part of one of them,
because nothing you wrote addresses a single point they make. What is it about the so-called trade deficit that has you so worried? Can you put it in words? I don’t fail to grasp that ANY criticism of Trump is viewed by his loyalists as unfair, it does not matter one bit to them whether or not it is legitimate, he’ll always be an undeserving victim in your eyes. And so you refuse to see any “substance” when someone substantially refutes something stupid he proposes, it’s “all hands on deck, battle stations, defend our savior.” It astonishes me that you guys don’t see how deeply in his trance you have enmeshed yourselves.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: okcpokefan12
Tell me you read the links I posted on this thread, or even one of them, or even part of one of them,
because nothing you wrote addresses a single point they make. What is it about the so-called trade deficit that has you so worried? Can you put it in words? I don’t fail to grasp that ANY criticism of Trump is viewed by his loyalists as unfair, it does not matter one bit to them whether or not it is legitimate, he’ll always be an undeserving victim in your eyes. And so you refuse to see any “substance” when someone substantially refutes something stupid he proposes, it’s “all hands on deck, battle stations, defend our savior.” It astonishes me that you guys don’t see how deeply in his trance you have enmeshed yourselves.
I don't need to read your links, tens of billions of dollars in trade deficit is not good for this country no matter how you want to look at it.
I have no issue with foreign trade as long as it is fair and benefits the US but when the deficits get the pint were are sending tens of billions of dollars every year to other countries when that money could and should stay here, I'm against it.
 
I don't need to read your links, tens of billions of dollars in trade deficit is not good for this country no matter how you want to look at it.
I have no issue with foreign trade as long as it is fair and benefits the US but when the deficits get the pint were are sending tens of billions of dollars every year to other countries when that money could and should stay here, I'm against it.
I didn't think you had read either of the links, or any portion of either one of them. Let me ask you again: what is it about the "trade deficit" that frightens you so much you want to tax American consumers 10% as punishment? Who is getting punished? What is a trade deficit?

Let me put it like this: Let's say you have $100 and you go the the hardware to buy a drill that costs $100. You clearly value the drill more than the $100 in your pocket, and the hardware clearly prefers your $100 to the drill. You make a trade in which both of you acquire something that is of more value to you than that with which you had to trade. So now the hardware has the $100 you used to have and you have $100 worth of drill instead of the hardware. Where's the deficit? Who suffers the deficit? Now apply the same reasoning to international trade. US companies trade Chinese companies millions of dollars in return for millions of dollars worth of merchandise. Where's the deficit? Who is the loser?
 
Last edited:
I didn't think you had read either of the links, or any portion of either one of them. Let me ask you again: what is it about the "trade deficit" that frightens you so much you want to tax American consumers 10% as punishment? Who is getting punished? What is a trade deficit?

Let me put it like this: Let's say you have $100 and you go the the hardware to buy a drill that costs $100. You clearly value the drill more than the $100 in your pocket, and the hardware clearly prefers your $100 to the drill. You make a trade in which both of you acquire something that is of more value to you than that with which you had to trade. So now the hardware has the $100 you used to have and you have $100 worth of drill instead of the hardware. Where's the deficit? Who suffers the deficit? Now apply the same reasoning to international trade. US companies trade Chinese companies millions of dollars in return for millions of dollars worth of merchandise. Where's the deficit? Who is the loser?


We know whats coming.

You better get on the horn to Beijing and tell them they’re really f’n with your preferred economic model.

Trade as we know it will absolutely grind to a halt.

Thats happening.

Has nothing to do with any Trump policy.

If we’re really lucky the manufacturing he spurred with tariffs will soften the blow.

Trump was just better at listening to what the Chinese have kept saying they’re going to do than you Dan.

He took steps to mitigate the impact.

You and the authors are to blinded by hate to recognize the real issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
We know whats coming.

You better get on the horn to Beijing and tell them they’re really f’n with your preferred economic model.

Trade as we know it will absolutely grind to a halt.

Thats happening.

Has nothing to do with any Trump policy.

If we’re really lucky the manufacturing he spurred with tariffs will soften the blow.

Trump was just better at listening to what the Chinese have kept saying they’re going to do than you Dan.

He took steps to mitigate the impact.

You and the authors are to blinded by hate to recognize the real issues.
I'm unaware of a huge growth in manufacturing in America caused by tariffs. I don't know if you are saying China is suffering because Trump implemented tariffs, but if you are I believe you are sorely mistaken. It wasn't that long ago many on this board were lamenting that China was cleaning our clock and America needed to implement the Chinese model if we want our economy to grow. I remember saying that a command economy cannot match a free market, that a command economy works until it quits working, and when it quits woking it comes fast and hard. Chinese command policies are at the point of implosion, but it has nothing to do with anything Trump did, and everything to do with the way they try to oversee their economy through government dictate. Trump mitigated nothing. Neither I nor the authors are blinded by personal animosity toward Trump, although it is obvious that is what Trump loyalists are going to see if someone criticizes *anything* to do about the man. Actually it is you who is blinded by supreme loyalty to the point you'll defend anything he promotes no matter how harmful it is to us.
 
I'm unaware of a huge growth in manufacturing in America caused by tariffs. I don't know if you are saying China is suffering because Trump implemented tariffs, but if you are I believe you are sorely mistaken. It wasn't that long ago many on this board were lamenting that China was cleaning our clock and America needed to implement the Chinese model if we want our economy to grow. I remember saying that a command economy cannot match a free market, that a command economy works until it quits working, and when it quits woking it comes fast and hard. Chinese command policies are at the point of implosion, but it has nothing to do with anything Trump did, and everything to do with the way they try to oversee their economy through government dictate. Trump mitigated nothing. Neither I nor the authors are blinded by personal animosity toward Trump, although it is obvious that is what Trump loyalists are going to see if someone criticizes *anything* to do about the man. Actually it is you who is blinded by supreme loyalty to the point you'll defend anything he promotes no matter how harmful it is to us.

What color is the sky in your world?

You didn’t address anything outside of your normal “Trump is a doodie head” crap.

Whats going to happen to free trade has f’all to do with Trump.
 
I didn't think you had read either of the links, or any portion of either one of them. Let me ask you again: what is it about the "trade deficit" that frightens you so much you want to tax American consumers 10% as punishment? Who is getting punished? What is a trade deficit?

Let me put it like this: Let's say you have $100 and you go the the hardware to buy a drill that costs $100. You clearly value the drill more than the $100 in your pocket, and the hardware clearly prefers your $100 to the drill. You make a trade in which both of you acquire something that is of more value to you than that with which you had to trade. So now the hardware has the $100 you used to have and you have $100 worth of drill instead of the hardware. Where's the deficit? Who suffers the deficit? Now apply the same reasoning to international trade. US companies trade Chinese companies millions of dollars in return for millions of dollars worth of merchandise. Where's the deficit? Who is the loser?
No I didn't read your links, I don't need your propaganda. What you don't seem to understand is our trade deficit has created our number one adversary in the world. We keep sending billions of dollars of our wealth to China which in turn they use to build their military and work against our interests around the world. It amazes me how a supposed pacifist like yourself can not see how our trade deficit works against your desires for peace. I will add in, what is less expensive a war, whether cold or hot with China or tariffs that will lead to the US becoming self reliant?
 
What color is the sky in your world?

You didn’t address anything outside of your normal “Trump is a doodie head” crap.

Whats going to happen to free trade has f’all to do with Trump.
That's hitting the nail on the head! Trump wouldn't know about free trade if he had a tutor to explain it to him. He's too convinced we need authoritarian governmental intervention - with him being the authority, of course - so we can make our economy in the image of China's. How else can we keep up? And by the way, I don't deny that I think Trump is a giant "doodie-head" but this is 100% about a bad policy he wants to implement, and the blind loyalty of his followers who don't care to examine how bad it is. If he's for it, you're for it.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: okcpokefan12
That's hitting the nail on the head! Trump wouldn't know about free trade if he had a tutor to explain it to him. He's too convinced we need authoritarian governmental intervention - with him being the authority, of course - so we can make our economy in the image of China's. How else can we keep up? And by the way, I don't deny that I think Trump is a giant "doodie-head" but this is 100% about a bad policy he wants to implement, and the blind loyalty of his followers who don't care to examine how bad it is. If he's for it, you're for it.

Are you a Chinese agent?
 
No I didn't read your links, I don't need your propaganda. What you don't seem to understand is our trade deficit has created our number one adversary in the world. We keep sending billions of dollars of our wealth to China which in turn they use to build their military and work against our interests around the world. It amazes me how a supposed pacifist like yourself can not see how our trade deficit works against your desires for peace. I will add in, what is less expensive a war, whether cold or hot with China or tariffs that will lead to the US becoming self reliant?
There are a thousand factors that have made China the "adversary" you've believe they are, but tariffs are way down the list. This notion that the US should be "self-reliant" ignores economic law from start to finish. It is not possible for one country to be self reliant in the way you envision, and even if it were possible why would a country want to be when it can rely on the experise of other countries to supply it with products that would be too expensive for it to produce on its own (provided it could produce the products on its own). You are deeply mistaken in thinking that trade is counter to peaceful interaction, it's exactly the opposite.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: okcpokefan12
Lol! @my_2cents is convinced I'm a rabid right-winger. Bearcat just called me a lefist, @Syskatine insists I'm a Russian agent, and now you're questioning whether I'm a secret Chinese agent! I'm either doing something wrong or somethng right!

Well for some reason you keep ignoring the real threat to free trade and keep bitching about a hypothetical that the world power brokers will never let happen.

China will collapse trade.

Their plans have been laid out for everyone to see.

Now, go ahead and blame that on Trump.

I know you can do it.
 
Well for some reason you keep ignoring the real threat to free trade and keep bitching about a hypothetical that the world power brokers will never let happen.

China will collapse trade.

Their plans have been laid out for everyone to see.

Now, go ahead and blame that on Trump.

I know you can do it.
Look, I agree that govermental agents will fight tooth and nail against free trade, it would hamper their global vision. But that means we should fight tooth and nail ourselves, because free trade is what makes for human progress. America has never been the "utopian free trade" country I would like it to be. But it started out pretty close and we went from one of the poorest countries in the world to the richest country in the history of the world. And we are on a downward slide because we have let our politicians assume authority to meddle with it. Trump is one in a long line of politicians that want to meddle.

In what way are you thinking China is going to collapse trade? Are you thinking they'll do it on purpose? I'm sorry, but I don't know what you mean when you say their plans have been laid out for everyone to see. Can you direct me to the plans so I can see them? I am not saying that Trump will be solely responsible if trade collapses, but he will certainly have a big hand in it if he gets his way.

Oh, I almost forgot: command economies are not a threat to free trade. America is not threatened by anything China does to itself economically as long as we stand tall with fortitude and practice free trade. We would only get stronger, and they would only get weaker.
 
But when it comes to understanding international trade and its benefits the man is as dumb as a rock.


He wants us to make our own products instead of the IP that is stolen and copied.

With high rates you could offer incentives to take over and tenovate or even build in places that have low employment like oil/coal centric states. Jobs and boom, but yeah let's keep buying stuff from overseas. People wonder why their is a wealth gap.
 
Last edited:
Look, I agree that govermental agents will fight tooth and nail against free trade, it would hamper their global vision. But that means we should fight tooth and nail ourselves, because free trade is what makes for human progress. America has never been the "utopian free trade" country I would like it to be. But it started out pretty close and we went from one of the poorest countries in the world to the richest country in the history of the world. And we are on a downward slide because we have let our politicians assume authority to meddle with it. Trump is one in a long line of politicians that want to meddle.

In what way are you thinking China is going to collapse trade? Are you thinking they'll do it on purpose? I'm sorry, but I don't know what you mean when you say their plans have been laid out for everyone to see. Can you direct me to the plans so I can see them? I am not saying that Trump will be solely responsible if trade collapses, but he will certainly have a big hand in it if he gets his way.

Oh, I almost forgot: command economies are not a threat to free trade. America is not threatened by anything China does to itself economically as long as we stand tall with fortitude and practice free trade. We would only get stronger, and they would only get weaker.
Look what just came out as if it is on cue:


 
There are a thousand factors that have made China the "adversary" you've believe they are, but tariffs are way down the list. This notion that the US should be "self-reliant" ignores economic law from start to finish. It is not possible for one country to be self reliant in the way you envision, and even if it were possible why would a country want to be when it can rely on the experise of other countries to supply it with products that would be too expensive for it to produce on its own (provided it could produce the products on its own). You are deeply mistaken in thinking that trade is counter to peaceful interaction, it's exactly the opposite.

I think it's still possible to disagree in this country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
That's hitting the nail on the head! Trump wouldn't know about free trade if he had a tutor to explain it to him. He's too convinced we need authoritarian governmental intervention - with him being the authority, of course - so we can make our economy in the image of China's. How else can we keep up? And by the way, I don't deny that I think Trump is a giant "doodie-head" but this is 100% about a bad policy he wants to implement, and the blind loyalty of his followers who don't care to examine how bad it is. If he's for it, you're for it.
George Washington was an authoritarian?
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner2000
George Washington was an authoritarian?
He was when he used troops to supress the Whiskey Rebellion. But I know where you're headed with this. After the revolution the US government funded itself almost entirely though tariffs.
 
Where did I call you a leftist? You are a anti Trumper
Somewhere in this thread while writing you lumped me in by the phrase "you leftists." Don't worry about it, I have very thick skin. I thought it was kinda funny, I made a hat trick: right-wing nut, "you leftist(s)", Russian agent for not supporting the proxy war. And then I hit the jackpot when it was suggested I am also a Chinese secret agent. Since I am really a "utopian fruitcake anarchist" I suppose I can resemble all four of those things.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: okcpokefan12
He was when he used troops to supress the Whiskey Rebellion. But I know where you're headed with this. After the revolution the US government funded itself almost entirely though tariffs.
George Washington was a tariff man.

Abraham Lincoln said he was in favor of a high protective tariff.

Teddy Roosevelt said, "I thank God I'm not a free trader."

F'in authoritarian dictators.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT