Revoke my security clearance too, Mr. President
- Thread starter Pokeabear
- Start date
I'm trying to understand how revoking your access to data you can't legally speak freely about is a restriction of free speech.
You’re theoretically allowed in this country to ciriticize government/politicians without reprisal. Theoretically.
It’s always been the powerful versus trump and the people.
Jawohl! Der Anführer ist unser Retter, schließe deine Augen und Ohren und höre mit deinem Herzen zu!
Definitely bring more hitler. Very original and thought provoking.
We just lost a hysterical liberal so excuse us if your timing is poor for us to put a lot of patience into another one.
This is a word you truly need to avoid using lol.....remember that whole pot-kettle thingy you love so much?
Do you even know what I said in German? You can’t run me off unless you ban me ask @SouthWestOKPoke lol
How would I know what you posted in German?
There is zero reason to run you off. Other than one dude with mental problems, liberals here are somewhat entertaining.
Says the “dude” who almost got banned for unprovoked posts concerning “dude with mental problems” lol.
Brave and man enough to repost what you said on the corral, own up to it and apologize...”dude”?
Well, at least some of the people. You know like maybe 40ish% of the people.
Yes I’m going to spend extra time on your posts because you want to be cute. Be right back...
Internet and bots have inflated their actual numbers, just like the second nazi rally last week showed how small and out numbered they really are. I’d say it’s down to about 25-30% very vocal few and realist oy even fewer.
Fair, but we all know that repubs and Dems at the upper echelon of power were working against trump. It just endears him more to people who hate the upper echelons of Washington. Should we trust these guys over Rogers and Mattis?
Double weird.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-he-will-revoke-bruce-ohrs-security-clearance
Trump 'suspects' he will revoke Bruce Ohr's security clearance
by Steven Nelson
| August 17, 2018 11:59 AM
Have we found the "treasonous" and "dangerous" crap that Boohoo Boy Brennan was referring to yet? Like actually treasonous/dangerous stuff and not made up red assed snowflake treasonous/dangerous stuff? If not, that's hyperbole.
Maybe you should type "treasonous" and "dangerous" into duckduckgo.com to refresh yourself on the definitions of those words.
Weird that this is getting overlooked by the hyperventilating masses. I guess since Boy Brennan was one of the Kenyan Goat Herder's boys and is a certified anti-Trumper now, that's all water under the bridge.
Some of Boy Brennan's fans have taken a hilarious beating on Twitter...
Response from the dude who actually killed bin Laden...
Sure.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wo...aiming-glory-for-Osama-bin-Laden-killing.html
Robert O’Neill has gone from ‘hero to zero’ after claiming glory for Osama bin Laden killing
Former Navy Seal faces angry backlash from fellow veterans of elite force amid three different accounts of who shot dead al-Qaeda chief in Pakistan raid
Philip Sherwell
The former US Navy Seal who claims to have shot dead Osama bin Laden has gone from “hero to zero” and “put a bulls-eye on his back” after coming forward to take the glory for the killing, another ex-member of the elite force has told The Telegraph.
Robert O’Neill is facing a deepening backlash from former comrades angered both by his disputed version of events inside the al-Qaeda chief’s Pakistan compound in May 2011 and his decision to go public.
There are now three different versions circulating of who delivered the fatal shot that took down American’s public enemy number one during the raid conducted by more than 20 commandos moving rapidly through the hide-out in darkness wearing night-vision goggles.
Jonathan Gilliam, a former Seal, condemned the actions and motives of Mr O’Neill, who draws on his special forces experiences in his well-paid appearances as a motivational speaker.
“It’s ridiculous for O’Neill to claim the credit for the fatal shot as we probably never will know and don’t need to know,” said Mr Gilliam, a security consultant, noting that his views reflected the views of many Seals with whom he had spoken.
“He served with great distinction, he had a great career and he was a great operator. But he went from hero to zero in the Seal community when he started using his career to cash in and draw crowds as a speaker. This reflects terribly on all of us and does not represent who we are.”
Mr Gilliam also expressed fears that Mr O’Neill had made himself and his family – and possibly even those who attend his talks – targets for attacks by Islamic extremists seeking revenge for the death of bin Laden.
“He’s put a bulls-eye not just on his back but on those around him by identifying himself. I would not want to be anywhere around him, I’m afraid. If I heard he was coming to give a speech at my workplace, I’d call in sick.”
Mr O’Neill’s home address is not public and it is not known if he has taken extra security arrangements or will be provided with protection by state or federal agencies after choosing to identify himself.
But when he gave an interview anonymously to Esquire magazine last year, he said that he has trained his children to hide in their bathtub at the first sign of a problem as it is the safest, most fortified place in their house, while he has taught his wife how to fire a shotgun through the closed bedroom door at an intruder.
Mr O’Neill has not, however, gone into hiding since disclosing his name. Indeed, he gave a talk to a chamber of commerce in Tennessee on Thursday night during which he related combat stories from Afghanistan but did not mention the bin Laden raid.
Mr Gilliam was similarly critical of Matt Bissonnette, another Seal on the raid who has taken credit for shooting bin Laden, as well as Joe Biden, the gaffe-prone vice president who first revealed that it was Seal Team 6 unit that took down bin Laden, and Leon Panetta, the former CIA chief who allowed scriptwriters full access for research on Zero Dark Thirty, the film about the raid.
“This is a problem that goes to the top,” he said. “Security is being compromised by the release of information that should not be public. It’s egregious behaviour.”
In an interview with The Washington Post, Mr O’Neill described how he killed bin Laden after he reached the third floor of the compound where bin Laden lived with his wives. He said that as other commandos peeled off, he found himself just behind the team’s “point-man” for the final assault on the bedroom.
When bin Laden appeared briefly in the doorway, the point-man fired but apparently missed, he said.
“I rolled past him into the room, just inside the doorway,” Mr O’Neill recalled. “There was bin Laden, standing there. He had his hands on a woman’s shoulders pushing her ahead” like a human shield.
“In that second I shot him, two times in the forehead,” he said. “Bap! Bap! The second time, as he is going down. He crumbled to the floor in front of his bed and I hit him again.”
Mr O’Neill told the Post that it was clear bin Laden had died instantly, his skull split by the first bullet. “I watched him take his last breaths,” he said.
It is a dramatic account. It is also wrong, according to at least two other Seals and military chiefs, quoted anonymously by CNN and the New York Times.
They insisted that it was the unidentified “pointman” who fired the fatal shot and that when Mr O’Neill and Mr Bissonette burst into the bedroom, they merely shot more bullets into the already mortally wounded al-Qaeda chief as he lay stricken.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
90 Million Shady Transactions from Over 4 Million Government Credit Cards
- Latest: LAY THE WOODY
-
