Remember When Democrats Told US Government Forcing Facebook Censorship A Conspiracy Theory

[2012Bearcat]

Meta ends fact-checking program as Zuckerberg vows to restore free expression on Facebook, Instagram

FIRST ON FOX: Meta is ending its fact-checking program and lifting restrictions on speech to “restore free expression" across Facebook, Instagram and Meta platforms, admitting its current content moderation practices have “gone too far."

www.foxnews.com

"We have a new administration coming in that is far from pressuring companies to censor and [is more] a huge supporter of free expression," Kaplan said, referring to the incoming Trump administration. "It gets us back to the values that Mark founded the company on."

My question now we have an admission from "META" government was forcing censorship, who will be held accountable for violating the American people's free speech rights?

 

[OKSTATE1]

Thank you Elon and Trump. Elon purchasing X saved free speech.

 

[2012Bearcat]

Thank you Elon and Trump. Elon purchasing X saved free speech.

I would go further. Elon's purchase of Twitter may go down in history as the one historical moment that saved the United States from destruction.

 

[squeak]

This is awesome. Libs will be along shortly explaining why free speech is bad.

 

[LAY THE WOODY]

Libs are a virus.

 

[2012Bearcat]

Libs are a virus.

Or a cancer, either one is a good depiction.

 

[LAY THE WOODY]

This is awesome. Libs will be along shortly explaining why free speech is bad.

The smiles and cackles experiment didn't work for the libs did it? (Kumala lost stinking up the joint/tampon tim droolin all over himself, the podium/mike). What an embarrassment, them idiots have no shame. Didn't work out 11/5/2024 did it? A whole lot of folks pulled their melons out of their keesters because of lib incompetence and truth from Trump.

MAGA!!

 

[my_2cents]

Meta ends fact-checking program as Zuckerberg vows to restore free expression on Facebook, Instagram

FIRST ON FOX: Meta is ending its fact-checking program and lifting restrictions on speech to “restore free expression" across Facebook, Instagram and Meta platforms, admitting its current content moderation practices have “gone too far."

www.foxnews.com

"We have a new administration coming in that is far from pressuring companies to censor and [is more] a huge supporter of free expression," Kaplan said, referring to the incoming Trump administration. "It gets us back to the values that Mark founded the company on."

My question now we have an admission from "META" government was forcing censorship, who will be held accountable for violating the American people's free speech rights?

Nice summary of the Trump propaganda line.

Now, let's actually take a moment and think through what is actually occurring.

(1) The incoming fascist President publicly threatened Mark Zuckerberg with prison time before the previous presidential election. Trump threatened that Zuckerberg could spend the rest of his life in prison if Zuckerberg wouldn't do what Trump wants.

(2) After the presidential election, Zuckerberg announced that Meta would give $1 Million to Trump's inaugural fund.

(3) Meta named a Republican Trump-operative, Joel Kaplan, to be its new Chief of Global Affairs.

(4) That Republican Trump-operative then goes onto Fox News to announce the new policies.

(5) Zuckerberg and Kaplan both cite Trump's election, Trump's desires, and Musk's influence as reason for the changes.

(7) Zuckerberg also announced his intention to grant Trump (the incoming "President") immediate actual power over his company, by appointing a close Trump-political confidant to the Meta Board of Directors.

(8) Remember, there is an FTC antitrust case against Meta that is moving to trial. One that an incoming President can have an influence upon.

(9) Today, from Trump's press conference, Trump says this in response to a question:

Reporter: "Do you think he's (Zuckerberg) directly responding to the threats you (Trump) have made to him (Zuckerberg) in the past."

Donald Trump: "Probably, yeah, probably."


Now, @2012Bearcat , can you seriously not REALLY see what is going on here? Zuckerberg is responding to threats of prison time from an incoming President. Zuckerberg is embracing changes that a Republican Trump operative is telling (pressuring?) him to make. Zuckerberg is giving power of his company over to an incoming President. And, that incoming President today admitted that it was his own threats that Zuckerberg is responding to.

Hello!

Got it yet? If not, maybe go back and insert Biden's name in place of Trump's name, and tell me if you then get it. If you then see it?

It astounds me how you support that which you claim to oppose.

Musk. Zuckerberg. Bezos. Trump. Etc

Oligarchy.

 

[LAY THE WOODY]

Nice summary of the Trump propaganda line.

Now, let's actually take a moment and think through what is actually occurring.

(1) The incoming fascist President publicly threatened Mark Zuckerberg with prison time before the previous presidential election. Trump threatened that Zuckerberg could spend the rest of his life in prison if Zuckerberg wouldn't do what Trump wants.

(2) After the presidential election, Zuckerberg announced that Meta would give $1 Million to Trump's inaugural fund.

(3) Meta named a Republican Trump-operative, Joel Kaplan, to be its new Chief of Global Affairs.

(4) That Republican Trump-operative then goes onto Fox News to announce the new policies.

(5) Zuckerberg and Kaplan both cite Trump's election, Trump's desires, and Musk's influence as reason for the changes.

(7) Zuckerberg also announced his intention to grant Trump (the incoming "President") immediate actual power over his company, by appointing a close Trump-political confidant to the Meta Board of Directors.

(8) Remember, there is an FTC antitrust case against Meta that is moving to trial. One that an incoming President can have an influence upon.

(9) Today, from Trump's press conference, Trump says this in response to a question:

Reporter: "Do you think he's (Zuckerberg) directly responding to the threats you (Trump) have made to him (Zuckerberg) in the past."

Donald Trump: "Probably, yeah, probably."


Now, @2012Bearcat , can you seriously not REALLY see what is going on here? Zuckerberg is responding to threats of prison time from an incoming President. Zuckerberg is embracing changes that a Republican Trump operative is telling (pressuring?) him to make. Zuckerberg is giving power of his company over to an incoming President. And, that incoming President today admitted that it was his own threats that Zuckerberg is responding to.

Hello!

Got it yet? If not, maybe go back and insert Biden's name in place of Trump's name, and tell me if you then get it. If you then see it?

It astounds me how you support that which you claim to oppose.

Musk. Zuckerberg. Bezos. Trump. Etc

Oligarchy.

How often they letcha outta that padded room.

 

[2012Bearcat]

Nice summary of the Trump propaganda line.

Now, let's actually take a moment and think through what is actually occurring.

(1) The incoming fascist President publicly threatened Mark Zuckerberg with prison time before the previous presidential election. Trump threatened that Zuckerberg could spend the rest of his life in prison if Zuckerberg wouldn't do what Trump wants.

(2) After the presidential election, Zuckerberg announced that Meta would give $1 Million to Trump's inaugural fund.

(3) Meta named a Republican Trump-operative, Joel Kaplan, to be its new Chief of Global Affairs.

(4) That Republican Trump-operative then goes onto Fox News to announce the new policies.

(5) Zuckerberg and Kaplan both cite Trump's election, Trump's desires, and Musk's influence as reason for the changes.

(7) Zuckerberg also announced his intention to grant Trump (the incoming "President") immediate actual power over his company, by appointing a close Trump-political confidant to the Meta Board of Directors.

(8) Remember, there is an FTC antitrust case against Meta that is moving to trial. One that an incoming President can have an influence upon.

(9) Today, from Trump's press conference, Trump says this in response to a question:

Reporter: "Do you think he's (Zuckerberg) directly responding to the threats you (Trump) have made to him (Zuckerberg) in the past."

Donald Trump: "Probably, yeah, probably."


Now, @2012Bearcat , can you seriously not REALLY see what is going on here? Zuckerberg is responding to threats of prison time from an incoming President. Zuckerberg is embracing changes that a Republican Trump operative is telling (pressuring?) him to make. Zuckerberg is giving power of his company over to an incoming President. And, that incoming President today admitted that it was his own threats that Zuckerberg is responding to.

Hello!

Got it yet? If not, maybe go back and insert Biden's name in place of Trump's name, and tell me if you then get it. If you then see it?

It astounds me how you support that which you claim to oppose.

Musk. Zuckerberg. Bezos. Trump. Etc

Oligarchy.

Have absolutely no issue with Zuckerberg being threatened with prison, he bowed down to your party to censor the free speech of Americans. IMO him, his employees and those in government that pressured or manipulated Twitter to censor the free speech of Americans should all spend time in prison. There is a reason Freedom of speech is the first amendment listed.

 

[my_2cents]

Have absolutely no issue with Zuckerberg being threatened with prison,

So you have no problem with a President or incoming President threatening someone with prison if they don't do what he wants them to do?

he bowed down to your party to censor the free speech of Americans.

I disagree this is what Zuckerberg did. But now, Zuckerberg is definitely bowing down to a political leader (Trump). Trump is engaged in censorship and open threats directed at Zuckerberg and Meta. Trump is doing exactly what you claim to oppose, and yet, you are fully supporting it all.

Go figure.

should all spend time in prison.

Trump is the one who should be in prison. A long time ago at that. Trump should have been arrested on January 6, 2021. And if Garland had actually done his job, Trump would be in prison today.

Trump is the convicted felon, who sought to overturn an election, encouraged an attacked on our nation's Capitol, and stole classified documents for goodness sakes. The man is an absolute traitor. Yet, you want to throw anybody in prison who doesn't do what your dear leader wants them to do.

Sir, you are no patriot. You are nothing but a fascist hack. And I'm not wasting any more of my time today on you.

 

[2012Bearcat]

So you have no problem with a President or incoming President threatening someone with prison if they don't do what he wants them to do?


I disagree this is what Zuckerberg did. But now, Zuckerberg is definitely bowing down to a political leader (Trump). Trump is engaged in censorship and open threats directed at Zuckerberg and Meta. Trump is doing exactly what you claim to oppose, and yet, you are fully supporting it all.

Go figure.


Trump is the one who should be in prison. A long time ago at that. Trump should have been arrested on January 6, 2021. And if Garland had actually done his job, Trump would be in prison today.

Trump is the convicted felon, who sought to overturn an election, encouraged an attacked on our nation's Capitol, and stole classified documents for goodness sakes. The man is an absolute traitor. Yet, you want to throw anybody in prison who doesn't do what your dear leader wants them to do.

Sir, you are no patriot. You are nothing but a fascist hack. And I'm not wasting any more of my time today on you.

And you wonder why your party was soundly rejected. LMAO

 

[LAY THE WOODY]

Have absolutely no issue with Zuckerberg being threatened with prison, he bowed down to your party to censor the free speech of Americans. IMO him, his employees and those in government that pressured or manipulated Twitter to censor the free speech of Americans should all spend time in prison. There is a reason Freedom of speech is the first amendment listed.

Trump has changed some minds.

 

[LAY THE WOODY]

And you wonder why your party was soundly rejected. LMAO

Pesos is a soft kinda guy. Like a fluffy marshmallow.

 

[squeak]

Nice summary of the Trump propaganda line.

Now, let's actually take a moment and think through what is actually occurring.

(1) The incoming fascist President publicly threatened Mark Zuckerberg with prison time before the previous presidential election. Trump threatened that Zuckerberg could spend the rest of his life in prison if Zuckerberg wouldn't do what Trump wants.

(2) After the presidential election, Zuckerberg announced that Meta would give $1 Million to Trump's inaugural fund.

(3) Meta named a Republican Trump-operative, Joel Kaplan, to be its new Chief of Global Affairs.

(4) That Republican Trump-operative then goes onto Fox News to announce the new policies.

(5) Zuckerberg and Kaplan both cite Trump's election, Trump's desires, and Musk's influence as reason for the changes.

(7) Zuckerberg also announced his intention to grant Trump (the incoming "President") immediate actual power over his company, by appointing a close Trump-political confidant to the Meta Board of Directors.

(8) Remember, there is an FTC antitrust case against Meta that is moving to trial. One that an incoming President can have an influence upon.

(9) Today, from Trump's press conference, Trump says this in response to a question:

Reporter: "Do you think he's (Zuckerberg) directly responding to the threats you (Trump) have made to him (Zuckerberg) in the past."

Donald Trump: "Probably, yeah, probably."


Now, @2012Bearcat , can you seriously not REALLY see what is going on here? Zuckerberg is responding to threats of prison time from an incoming President. Zuckerberg is embracing changes that a Republican Trump operative is telling (pressuring?) him to make. Zuckerberg is giving power of his company over to an incoming President. And, that incoming President today admitted that it was his own threats that Zuckerberg is responding to.

Hello!

Got it yet? If not, maybe go back and insert Biden's name in place of Trump's name, and tell me if you then get it. If you then see it?

It astounds me how you support that which you claim to oppose.

Musk. Zuckerberg. Bezos. Trump. Etc

Oligarchy.

Hmmmm…A fascist is threatening people so they stop censoring free speech. How fascist of him!

Lol…go to bed.

 

[OUSOONER67]

So you have no problem with a President or incoming President threatening someone with prison if they don't do what he wants them to do?


I disagree this is what Zuckerberg did. But now, Zuckerberg is definitely bowing down to a political leader (Trump). Trump is engaged in censorship and open threats directed at Zuckerberg and Meta. Trump is doing exactly what you claim to oppose, and yet, you are fully supporting it all.

Go figure.


Trump is the one who should be in prison. A long time ago at that. Trump should have been arrested on January 6, 2021. And if Garland had actually done his job, Trump would be in prison today.

Trump is the convicted felon, who sought to overturn an election, encouraged an attacked on our nation's Capitol, and stole classified documents for goodness sakes. The man is an absolute traitor. Yet, you want to throw anybody in prison who doesn't do what your dear leader wants them to do.

Sir, you are no patriot. You are nothing but a fascist hack. And I'm not wasting any more of my time today on you.

4yrs to go 2putas. 🤣