Check out this short video (80 seconds) of the organized photo shoot:
Last edited:
Wow that seems like a slanderous remark to Mega's character. If I was Mega I would have my lawyer contact you.Mega likes it, of course. Anything nazi, mega likes.
So what's the criticism? If you back out the adjectives and grainy CNN blond it seems to prove.... well, nothing?
Wow that seems like a slanderous remark to Mega's character. If I was Mega I would have my lawyer contact you.
Mega likes it, of course. Anything nazi, mega likes.
So what's the criticism? If you back out the adjectives and grainy CNN blond it seems to prove.... well, nothing?
I know this isn't directed at me but I feel compelled to say I was pretty damn hard on Trump over the Syria response. I still don't believe Assad did it. It's doesn't pass the common sense test.Didn't you read?
It proves:
1. Assad did nothing wrong;
2. Deep state propaganda conspiracy on behalf of the Jews.
Which leads immediately to the question of why aren't the /pol/s and red pillers of the earth like NZ Poke going after Trump for falling prey to this obvious propaganda campaign? After all, he bombed Syrian over this stuff right? Syria did nothing wrong, right?
Trump the "4-D chess" player got duped by the deep state propaganda conspiracy on behalf of the Jews and not a peep from NZ Poke.
Yet another critical thinking fail NZ Poke. Who needs critical thinking when you have another meme to post though, know what I mean?![]()
I know this isn't directed at me but I feel compelled to say I was pretty damn hard on Trump over the Syria response. I still don't believe Assad did it. It's doesn't pass the common sense test.
You are correct, this was not directed at you.
It was directed at a single deadhead red piller that swallows every bit of the red pill crap whilst convincing himself it's caviar.
He is now saying that ISIS is an Israeli creation.
Oh boy
The price this country paid to defeat that nazi thinking makes seeing it in american discourse again pretty distasteful to me. Like... it's disrespectful to the country on a non-binary, non-political, fundamental level. It invokes the same emotional reaction in me that flag burning does.
How anyone could be aware of the patriotism and sacrifice of the Americans that defeated that shit-hearted nazi ideology, and then turn around and spread it, is crazy. I just didn't see or hear this stuff before Biff grabbed the mike. Maybe I just had my head in the sand.
Your problem is letting your emotions get the better of you (hello Pavlov's dog), and allowing corporations to control how you think, instead of using your independent brainpower.
Let me break down some very interesting information.
The Chinese (one of the world's most scholarly societies throughout history) invested a staggering $45 billion dollars in the US in 2016 alone (and invested $64 billion in the US from 1990 to 2015 -- source for both Chinese investment statistics)
Here's what many Chinese think about the country they're investing in -- academic institutions have been set up across China to study it:
![]()
Article from above -- highly suggested:
http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/books/167289/nanjing-jewish-studies
Quote from article:
"Just before my visit to Nanjing, the Chinese tycoon Chen Guangbiao made international headlines by publicly announcing his ambitions to buy the New York Times and later the Wall Street Journal. In a TV interview he explained that he would be an ideal newspaper magnate because “I am very good at working with Jews”—who, he said, controlled the media."
And before you call the Chinese stupid, distasteful Nazis, here's what the Goldman Sachs CEO had to say about his visit to China a few days ago:
Once again, you're letting your emotions cloud your reasoning.
When it comes to sacrificing, Americans born in Flint Michigan (ran by Democrats for decades) have sacrificed their ability to drink water, and their mental health from not being able to drink it.
Meanwhile, in this public speech (in a very public setting), this rabbi is bragging about 1200 rabbis pushing our government to allow "unlimited" (her words) low-skilled refugees into our increasingly third world country.
Highly suggested short video of speech:
Her speech and goals would be a lot more noble and credible if her other country was getting asked to make the same "patriotic sacrifices" (your words) that we are (and countries buckling under refugees across Europe).
![]()
![]()
![]()
Why does NZ hate Jews? Or at least want to blame everything on them?
No.
I'm intellectually curious and a researcher.
Goebbels would be proud of that video. Right up his alley.
I find what nzpoke posts as interesting. I don't think he has ever shied away from any outside critical analysis. The presentation and following dissection is good for all of us.
Love NZ's posts.I find what nzpoke posts as interesting. I don't think he has ever shied away from any outside critical analysis. The presentation and following dissection is good for all of us.
The problem is he does none of the critical analysis himself before posting his bs.
When is the last time he posted something that wasn't a:
1. Cut and paste of someone else;
2. A cut and paste of a link from someone else;
3. A repeat of some argument/point he had previously cut and pasted from someone else?
They aren't "his posts"....
Those liberals tear his points to shreds, and prove them wrong, on a regular basis, and you claim that it is the liberals who lack common sense.
Perfectly logical stance.
You've never tore him to shreds or disproved anyone of his points.
You haven't been paying attention.
Those liberals tear his points to shreds, and prove them wrong, on a regular basis, and you claim that it is the liberals who lack common sense.
Perfectly logical stance.
This seems like an emotional response that is not backed up by the stats. Should we declare a winner to each debate over his posts? I like that.
This seems like an emotional response that is not backed up by the stats. Should we declare a winner to each debate over his posts? I like that.
It's a consolidation of information/tweets from a certain ideology that I wouldn't follow if he didn't post it here. I think Jews wield a lot of international power disproportionate to their population. Whether it is nefarious or not is up to interpretation and our selective acceptance of what we choose to believe as facts. If this whole board was posting the same line of thinking it would get old but one person posting this narrative isn't too much to stomach. We have multiple liberals who care not for common sense and watching them get challenged is again good for all of us.
You should just follow his twitter page or whatnot because using this message board for his endless retweets is spam. Nothing but. I'm not calling for him to be barred from doing so or anything. I realize this is a lossely moderated board by design and I like it that way....but I'm gonna call it out for what it is.
As for his posts challenging liberals.....
Fighting stupid fire with stupid fire.
Got it.
NZ's cut and pastes really aren't all that challenging though. They get debunked pretty routinely and pretty easily. He even occasionally acknowledges the factual errors and logical fallacies, but the posts the same nonsense again. Other times, he simply ignores it.
More trolling/spamming than challenging.
NZ used to be a decent poster whether I disagreed or agreed with him. It's disappointing to see he has deluded himself into thinking he is an" independent thinker" when he has actually become nothing more than a meat puppet parroting a narrative without critical thought or reasoning. A sad devolution IMO.
You should just follow his twitter page or whatnot because using this message board for his endless retweets is spam. Nothing but. I'm not calling for him to be barred from doing so or anything. I realize this is a lossely moderated board by design and I like it that way....but I'm gonna call it out for what it is.
As for his posts challenging liberals.....
Fighting stupid fire with stupid fire.
Got it.
NZ's cut and pastes really aren't all that challenging though. They get debunked pretty routinely and pretty easily. He even occasionally acknowledges the factual errors and logical fallacies, but the posts the same nonsense again. Other times, he simply ignores it.
More trolling/spamming than challenging.
NZ used to be a decent poster whether I disagreed or agreed with him. It's disappointing to see he has deluded himself into thinking he is an" independent thinker" when he has actually become nothing more than a meat puppet parroting a narrative without critical thought or reasoning. A sad devolution IMO.
NZ used to be a decent poster whether I disagreed or agreed with him. It's disappointing to see he has deluded himself into thinking he is an" independent thinker" when he has actually become nothing more than a meat puppet
There's difference between challenging the accuracy of my information ---- IE "is this information factually accurate / credible and can I independently verify it?" ---- and trying to discredit me / shame me. (What you've mostly been doing)
Example: in addition to the post above (calling me a "meat puppet"), in this single thread, you've also described my information as:
- BS
- endless retweets
- word salad
- cut and pastes
- a repeat of some point
- stupid fire
- nonsense
Look very closely at the terms above (your exact words in this thread) -- notice anything uniting all of them?
Every one of those terms is a negative description of the information --- but none of the terms is addressing or challenging the information's accuracy.
By all means, challenge my information's accuracy. I often tell people to do their own research.
And lastly, did my earlier posting of the 12 Rules for Radicals secretly convert you to Alinsky tactics? You wouldn't be the first intelligent person seduced by Alinsky (Hillary Clinton wrote her entire 92 page college senior thesis on the Alinsky model --- link to Hillary's senior thesis)
You've been using steps 5 / 8 / 12 a lot.
![]()
Interesting re the political ads of the world's most powerful Alinsky convert:
By all means, challenge my information's accuracy. I often tell people to do their own research.