ADVERTISEMENT

Re: Brett Kavanaugh

Marshal Jim Duncan

MegaPoke is insane
Gold Member
Dec 22, 2013
31,205
38,487
113
the Senate, and individual Senators, literally have more information witin their grasp about him than ANY other Supreme Court nominee in history.

  • 7 FBI Backgroung Investigations
  • He's issued 100's of opinions on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Statements of dozens and dozens of professional colleagues and litigants, none of which gave him a bad review. Most of them remarked upon his collegiality and temperament
  • He has a reputation for turning out especially proficient clerks, the majority of which have been female.
  • He held private meetings with 65 Senators and would've met with all of them
  • Gave 31 hours of testimony prior to last week
  • And personally responded to over 1,200 questions, more post-hearing questions than ALL PREVIOUS USSC NOMINEES COMBINED.
 
Republican committee members withheld thousands of Kavanaugh documents until the last minute.

Was this just a coincidence?
 
Republican committee members withheld thousands of Kavanaugh documents until the last minute.

Was this just a coincidence?
Dems withheld a bullshit story of asssult for weeks. Was that a coincident?
 
That was what Ford wanted...so that she wouldn’t be publicized and receive death threats and have to relocate her family.

And I am sure she wanted to keep things so secret and that was the reason she chose to go to the press before anyone knew about it.
. Other than fienstien of course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: imprimis
RingedDishonestAustralianshelduck-size_restricted.gif


yi84g.jpg
 

I take everything you post with a grain of salt, but are you stating that the 'former FBI agent' who administered her test had previously been involved in the Russia investigation? The tweet and article excerpt are hard to comprehend. I hadn't seen any details regarding who administered the test other than an 'ex-FBI agent'.
 
I take everything you post with a grain of salt, but are you stating that the 'former FBI agent' who administered her test had previously been involved in the Russia investigation? The tweet and article excerpt are hard to comprehend. I hadn't seen any details regarding who administered the test other than an 'ex-FBI agent'.

Why “with a grain of salt?”

If you want to dive into details.

https://theconservativetreehouse.co...ed-witness-to-modify-testimony-and-statement/
 
I take everything you post with a grain of salt, but are you stating that the 'former FBI agent' who administered her test had previously been involved in the Russia investigation? The tweet and article excerpt are hard to comprehend. I hadn't seen any details regarding who administered the test other than an 'ex-FBI agent'.
Why “with a grain of salt?”

If you want to dive into details.

https://theconservativetreehouse.co...ed-witness-to-modify-testimony-and-statement/

Theconservativetreehouse is decently legit, though not 100%. Well connected site owner.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT