http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/prez_track_jan20
Citing likely US voters.
Interesting.
Citing likely US voters.
Interesting.
The Rasmusson and LA Times polls were the only 2 major polls that predicted a DJT win. Methodology is everything when it comes to achieving a representative and meaningful sample.http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/prez_track_jan20
Citing likely US voters.
Interesting.
You guys confuse me. We are back to believing polls? Can we pin a thread or something that lets us all know when and which polls we believe day to day?
It isn't that difficult to tell which polls have an effective methodology that is less likely to experience a high degree of selection bias. You just have to take the time to look before you fall head over heels with the "results."You guys confuse me. We are back to believing polls? Can we pin a thread or something that lets us all know when and which polls we believe day to day?
http://m.rasmussenreports.com/publi...lection_2016/rasmussen_reports_calls_it_rightYou guys confuse me. We are back to believing polls? Can we pin a thread or something that lets us all know when and which polls we believe day to day?
It was actually the USC-LA Times collaboration of a new polling technique. The LA Times newspaper probably had Hildabeast winning all 57 states.The LA Times was the only paper accurately and consistently predicting a Trump win throughout the election cycle.