ADVERTISEMENT

Question

So you are ok with a sitting committee member hiding evidence from the FBI when they were doing their background investigation in order to spring it later and demand the FBI do an investigation? Do you realize how obsurd that sounds?

I have posted numerous times that I am not a fan of how Feinstein handled the letter. How many times must I post that?

However, deflecting to Feinstein when talking about whether or not a full and fair investigation should be conducted by the FBI at this point is pointless and irrelevant. We can't change how Feinstein reacted. All we can do NOW is seek to find the truth by having a fair and full investigation.
 
I have posted numerous times that I am not a fan of how Feinstein handled the letter. How many times must I post that?

However, deflecting to Feinstein when talking about whether or not a full and fair investigation should be conducted by the FBI at this point is pointless and irrelevant. We can't change how Feinstein reacted. All we can do NOW is seek to find the truth by having a fair and full investigation.

Youve posted there should be an investigation 100 times. Why so persnickety about the former?
 
Why so persnickety about the former?

Because at this point it is a deflection many on the right are using.

I tell you what though, I'll support an investigation into Feinstein decision to hold back the letter as part of the FBI's investigation into all of this. You agree?
 
Because at this point it is a deflection many on the right are using.

I tell you what though, I'll support an investigation into Feinstein decision to hold back the letter as part of the FBI's investigation into all of this. You agree?

Ler me get back to you on Saturday.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT