ADVERTISEMENT

Question... Is this not being an evolution denier?

MegaPoke

MegaPoke

Moderator
Moderator
May 29, 2001
58,299
56,117
113
54
Tulsa
www.shipmanphotos.com
In fact, don't almost all social engineering projects ignore evolutionary traits - including the differences in gender and the effects of tribalism?

How is this fundamentally any different from saying that climate change isn't happening or that it's at minimum not caused by man?

Serious question. The science is clear on this.

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/...rse-examines-negative-effects-of-masculinity/
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton and ThorOdinson13
only liberals with a straight face can say sexual preference is biological (reference 100% biologically gay Greek army) but testosterone is a choice. These people need their asses kicked. As long as they don't have ADHD of course.

Don't transgender women take testosterone? Are they under attack now too? Chas bono is now a racist or whatever this is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007, GunsOfFrankEaton and ThorOdinson13
They center everything around socialization and ignore evolution. If evolution is taken into account many aspects of their theories fall apart. Some of the blame is on society and the fear of ostricization in pointing out the cold truths of science as well.

It's the exact same in regards to differences between the races. There are biological differences due to evolution/environmental determinism. But it's mostly taboo to discuss (socialization in process, look at that). Hell, I saw a video a few weeks ago discussing how environmental determinism is racist.

That's not to say that socialization and nurture have no role. They most definitely do. It's just been the primary focus with nature being disregarded after a certain point within our evolution as a species.

I've said for a long time that the real science deniers are on the left even though they have fun throwing the moniker at the right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007, GunsOfFrankEaton and MegaPoke
MegaPoke said:
In fact, don't almost all social engineering projects ignore evolutionary traits - including the differences in gender and the effects of tribalism?

How is this fundamentally any different from saying that climate change isn't happening or that it's at minimum not caused by man?

Serious question. The science is clear on this.

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/...rse-examines-negative-effects-of-masculinity/
Click to expand...
This might be the answer to why the banana clip loving syskatine claims she has 30 guns. She just wants to fit in with the gun loving alpha males.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
Good to know the guys obsessed with alphas and cucks don't think masculinity is socially constructed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
Medic007 said:
This might be the answer to why the banana clip loving syskatine claims she has 30 guns. She just wants to fit in with the gun loving alpha males.
Click to expand...
How many of those 30 guns are water pistols?
 
MegaPoke said:
Science denier.
Click to expand...
Scientists have declared the end the the nature and nuture debate after recent studies have revealed all behavior is genetically/biologically determined. As a science believer, I have stopped wasting my time parenting my children.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
07pilt said:
Scientists have declared the end the the nature and nuture debate after recent studies have revealed all behavior is genetically/biologically determined. As a science believer, I have stopped wasting my time parenting my children.
Click to expand...

Brilliant!!
 
07pilt said:
Good to know the guys obsessed with alphas and cucks don't think masculinity is socially constructed.
Click to expand...
So you're telling me you cannot be born an alpha or a cuck?
 
07pilt said:
Scientists have declared the end the the nature and nuture debate after recent studies have revealed all behavior is genetically/biologically determined. As a science believer, I have stopped wasting my time parenting my children.
Click to expand...

You mean you stopped parenting them except every other weekend and two weeks in the summer.
 
ThorOdinson13 said:
Did he ever really have a chance? If any legal system was ever so solidly stacked against females as the family courts are against males there would be outrage at the institutional sexism.
Click to expand...
Judge said due to my inborn masculinity my wife would provide better nuturing. I didn't argue because I am not a science denier.
 
07pilt said:
Judge said due to my inborn masculinity my wife would provide better nuturing. I didn't argue because I am not a science denier.
Click to expand...
I hate to break into this conversation, but did you know that the primary male sex hormone is testosterone and the primary female hormone is estrogen?

In fact, the influence of these sex hormones is so pronounced that giving estrogen to a male will literally change his physical characteristics to resemble those of a female and testerstorone given to a female will change hers to resemble a male. It would probably be cheaper and physically safer if these actual sex changes could be done by nuture and not nature.
 
Medic007 said:
I hate to break into this conversation, but did you know that the primary male sex hormone is testosterone and the primary female hormone is estrogen?

In fact, the influence of these sex hormones is so pronounced that giving estrogen to a male will literally change his physical characteristics to resemble those of a female and testerstorone given to a female will change hers to resemble a male. It would probably be cheaper and physically safer if these actual sex changes could be done by nuture and not nature.
Click to expand...
I assume that the judge knew that since she had to graduate high school before going to law school. We can double check with CowboyJD though, just to be sure.
 
07pilt said:
I assume that the judge knew that since she had to graduate high school before going to law school. We can double check with CowboyJD though, just to be sure.
Click to expand...
You'd be surprised. There seems to be a growing number of college educated people that think that males only act like males because they are taught to act that way.
 
Medic007 said:
You'd be surprised. There seems to be a growing number of college educated people that think that males only act like males because they are taught to act that way.
Click to expand...
My judge was well aware. She thought she was Darwin or something.

From the OP's article:

“We know that men are underrepresented on campus when it comes to campus leadership roles and getting needed medical and mental health services,” Sam Johnson, a violence prevention advisor says of the program. “They’re also overrepresented in acts of violence and use of drugs and alcohol.​

This joker needs to realize that it is just a biological fact that men don't like leadership roles and eschew medical health services and that testosterone predestines men to lives of violence and substance abuse. Get over it SJWs! Consider yourself Darwin'd!
 
07pilt said:
My judge was well aware. She thought she was Darwin or something.

From the OP's article:

“We know that men are underrepresented on campus when it comes to campus leadership roles and getting needed medical and mental health services,” Sam Johnson, a violence prevention advisor says of the program. “They’re also overrepresented in acts of violence and use of drugs and alcohol.​

This joker needs to realize that it is just a biological fact that men don't like leadership roles and eschew medical health services and that testosterone predestines men to lives of violence and substance abuse. Get over it SJWs! Consider yourself Darwin'd!
Click to expand...
True! We need to start teaching boys that leadership roles are a guy thing! We've done a terrible job at that in the past. We also need to realize that parenting is the cause of most of the risky behaviors of young males. It's a good thing you don't have custody I guess.
 
Medic007 said:
True! We need to start teaching boys that leadership roles are a guy thing! We've done a terrible job at that in the past. We also need to realize that parenting is the cause of most of the risky behaviors of young males. It's a good thing you don't have custody I guess.
Click to expand...
At the same time we need to go easy on Joe Mixon. He can't help that he was born a man.
 
Guys just need more mental and medical health services. It's too bad that somebody didn't hold someone accountable for prehistoric Cavewoman Barbie and prehistoric PS4. Imagine where we'd be today if gender training was recognized as the KEY to everything in the days of yore. That damn amygdala and it's response to testosterone is definitely a nurture problem. Train that testosterone right out of the brain!
 
07pilt said:
At the same time we need to go easy on Joe Mixon. He can't help that he was born a man.
Click to expand...
Someone should have taught him to hit in a gender neutral fashion. Where was he led wrong? Was it his strength and conditioning coach? He probably should have learned that hitting a girl was wrong. I'm surprised he went 18 years without ever hearing that. Train that testosterone right out of his brain!
 
07pilt said:
Judge said due to my inborn masculinity my wife would provide better nuturing. I didn't argue because I am not a science denier.
Click to expand...

I know you think you're making cute little counter-arguments but you're not. Condolences on the divorce by the way. Especially to the children. Who are the real victims.
 
ThorOdinson13 said:
I know you think you're making cute little counter-arguments but you're not. Condolences on the divorce by the way. Especially to the children. Who are the real victims.
Click to expand...
Don't be so hard on him. Gender identity is a newer frontier of the left, so they don't have the talking points fully mastered. Much like white guilt, toxic masculinity will take time to fully develop.

It hasn't been that long ago that males were males and females were females and to transition from one to the other actually required hormone therapy. Now you can be whatever you want. You are now the sole determiner as to what sex or lack thereof you are. Genetics and their consequences are of no concern. Pretty soon you'll be able to choose your own gravity and personal space weather too.
 
Medic007 said:
Don't be so hard on him. Gender identity is a newer frontier of the left, so they don't have the talking points fully mastered. Much like white guilt, toxic masculinity will take time to fully develop.

It hasn't been that long ago that males were males and females were females and to transition from one to the other actually required hormone therapy. Now you can be whatever you want. You are now the sole determiner as to what sex or lack thereof you are. Genetics and their consequences are of no concern. Pretty soon you'll be able to choose your own gravity and personal space weather too.
Click to expand...

I give you otherkin
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
ThorOdinson13 said:
I give you otherkin
Click to expand...
Hilarious that you posted that. I was getting ready to post that some of the left is in the beginning stages of describing species as a social construct. Who says I can't be a dog if that's what I identify as? If genetics can't identify a basic trait like sex, it certainly can't pigeon hole something into species, genus, family, order, class phylum, kingdom, domain, etc.

Lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThorOdinson13
ThorOdinson13 said:
I know you think you're making cute little counter-arguments but you're not. Condolences on the divorce by the way. Especially to the children. Who are the real victims.
Click to expand...
Read the OP, then read the linked article. This shit is too stupid to earnestly argue with <extreme nerd voice> "well actually." The only response to this strain of anti-intellectualism is to mock it for the stupidity that it is.

The divorce thing is made up. HSH, medic, and I just like to riff on it. Something something I'm a cuck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
Wait what? Did you not film your wife in a bukakke with the thunder either????
 
07pilt said:
Read the OP, then read the linked article. This shit is too stupid to earnestly argue with <extreme nerd voice> "well actually." The only response to this strain of anti-intellectualism is to mock it for the stupidity that it is.

The divorce thing is made up. HSH, medic, and I just like to riff on it. Something something I'm a cuck.
Click to expand...

That's good on the divorce. As to the anti-intellectualism. Are you referring to pushback in having such courses taught in university or the courses themselves?
 
ThorOdinson13 said:
That's good on the divorce. As to the anti-intellectualism. Are you referring to pushback in having such courses taught in university or the courses themselves?
Click to expand...
The ignorant nature of the pushback. You could argue that a university is not the right forum for the course. You could argue that the course is only preaching to the choir and useless. You could even argue that our conceptions of masculinity do more good than harm. But the approach here of calling it evolution denial is either profoundly stupid or displays a lack of curiosity about either/both the program or/and evolution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
07pilt said:
The ignorant nature of the pushback. You could argue that a university is not the right forum for the course. You could argue that the course is only preaching to the choir and useless. You could even argue that our conceptions of masculinity do more good than harm. But the approach here of calling it evolution denial is either profoundly stupid or displays a lack of curiosity about either/both the program or/and evolution.
Click to expand...

So masculine features and characteristics are not in any way developed as a result of evolution?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

thetruth

Here is a WSJ commentary re: the "science" of lockdowns.

Replies
1
Views
356
24/7 Politics
2012Bearcat
2
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back