Pam Bondi new AG nominee
- Thread starter AC2020
- Start date
She's easy on the eyes and smart and tough.
First female attorney general? That's going to put Democrats in a pickle.
She won't be first or second. Reno and Lynch.
Home run pick. Trump tricked the left into going after the guy he never was gonna pick, now they have no ammo to use against his FEMALE pick with zero baggage.
Trump wins. America wins.
Trump wins. America wins.
Like I said, first female AG.
Why should Democrats fear her if they've done nothing illegal? Hmmmmm
First legitimate female attorney general.
Really solid pick… much better than Gaetz
He just admitted 'we' are criminals. Because criminals are the only people that need to be worried about Trump hiring a competent AG.
She's not the first female AG. She was FLORIDA's First Female AG. Why that part of the announcement is getting misread, I do not understand.
As long as we get this
and dems are the kibble and bits I don't care who gets the job
and dems are the kibble and bits I don't care who gets the job
How soon will the first sexual assault charge is levied by the Dims?
Why would Democrats fear a AG who follows the Constitution and enforces the law?
I found it fascinating that they stated that's WHY they should fear her.
I think people have forgotten, as soon as the 2020 election was stolen, she said something needed to be done. Even went on Fox News and got mocked by their hosts for saying the election was rigged. I believe Trump had her as part of his defense team in the impeachment hearings that happened later.
He wouldnt have nominated her if he didn't know she would bury the deep state. They know it too, that's why they are saying to be worried about her.
Said every authoritarian who ever lived. Don’t mistake my response to your authoritarian screed as evidence of my being against this nomination. I just wonder if you occasionally take a step back and listen to some of the things you say.
Your confidence in DJT’s competence is unmatched! How soon will he bury the deep state? One month? Two? Give us a time line, please.
You haven't answered the question, why would Democrats fear a competent AG who follows the Constitution and enforces the law? Isn't that the job?
After watching years of Democrats being guilty of what they accuse Republicans of, the answer should be obvious. Democrats tell on themselves if you just listen to them.
Only a idiot would think Trump could bury the deep state in four years. What is hoped is Trump can try, get the process started and future leaders can continue to get them out of government.
No, you are the one trying to hold Trump to the standard of the total removal of the Deep state. If you are smart enough you will realize what I'm saying.
Unfortunately, completely eradicating the corruption in DC will take decades. But Trump will take a massive bite out of it in this term.
Trump has told us what he wants to do:
Deport 12-15 million illegals
Strip waste from government
End the IRS
End the Fed
Those moves alone will do massive damage to the deep state. The problem is the right doesn't have the spine to support Trump and actually let him save America. Wait till Jan 20th when Homan starts deporting illegals. The media will claim Trump is ripping screaming babies out of the arms of crying mothers and destroying happy families.
And the 'Trump's horrific flaws' crowd will bend the knee and call Trump out as being an asshole that needs to leave those poor families alone that JUST CAME HERE FOR A BETTER LIFE!
The cold reality is, we have a shit hole country because too many on the right let the left bully them into not fighting for something better. They would rather we have RINOs running the right, and the media not calling them names, than live in a country we can all be proud of.
Why can't I have the country run better without using married men who chase tail at college parties? And why don't you have enough respect for the moderate voter who can recognize the difference between mainstream media bullshit and behavior that's creepy as F.
I know what you are saying, and basically, I agree with you. MatchesMalone, OTOH, appears to be delusional in his glorification of DJT. He almost makes you look moderately sensible!
Is that what Hegseth did? I thought it was an employee of his that he had an NDA signed with. I don't have the details on the Hegseth case besides there was "hush money" paid. So it could be something as simple as an inappropriate comment. As a CEO, there are a number of reasonable activities that simply due to the power dynamic of the role can be elevated to sexual harassment, and thus lead to NDAs and settlements. Not every NDA is wrong, nor do I find that being party to an NDA to be immediately disqualifying. I voted for Trump and he had NDAs with his porn stars. But then again, my choice with Trump was binary. I either vote for Trump or I vote for Kamala. These appointments aren't binary. Its not a choice between Gaetz or a liberal. Yet you act like it is. Its either these individuals (with their baggage) or its a RINO. Frankly, if that's true, then MAGA will fail, because these individuals have proven they think with their d_cks and will eventually step on it while in office and will bring the whole movement and its progress to a grinding halt. Better to get them out of the way now, then let them give Dems the opening to slam the door on MAGA in '26.
You need to work on your reading comprehension. I knew exactly what he was saying but then again I know with out question there are no absolutes in life other than death.
Check out the other thread on Hegseth, @fatman76 has a good rundown.
My thing is, I don't see baggage, I see whether or not they are going to save America.
We are trying to take down a government that is very likely run by literal satanic pedophies, and we've got people on the right sayin we can't let someone do it if there is a rumor they committed adultery.
I get that some of you are seriously worried about how you appear to others and the character of the person you support, but most of us just want our country back.
Hegseth has serious issues with sleeping around. He'd probably tell you the same.
I recapped what I know in the other thread, but the bottom line is his sexual habits and fidelity issues in his personal life don't mean a damn thing when it comes to how he'd lead the military.
He's a tool to get a job done, not someone you're inviting for Sunday dinner. Which would be a bad idea because he prob wants to bang your wife.
Similar threads
