On the Deep State

[Marshal Jim Duncan]

The author is former Head of Legal Counsel at DOJ and is a critic of President Trump.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/apr/22/leaks-trump-deep-state-fbi-cia-michael-flynn

 

[HanAholeSolo2.0]

seems like s good place to drop this. @davidallen etc probably will focus on the source but this is a pretty tight summary of the counter narrative which I find holds up better to scrutiny by the day.

 

[Pancreek1]

And the author worked directly for Comey at DOJ. For him to write that after working for Comey says something.

 

[07pilt]

seems like s good place to drop this. @davidallen etc probably will focus on the source but this is a pretty tight summary of the counter narrative which I find holds up better to scrutiny by the day.

View embedded media

Nunes? Now they got him (Mueller).

What is the story now on Mueller, is he good and about to take down the Obama and HRC, or is he bad and tilting at Trump windmills?

 

[CowboyPhil]

Nunes? Now they got him (Mueller).

What is the story now on Mueller, is he good and about to take down the Obama and HRC, or is he bad and tilting at Trump windmills?

Who really knows what Mueller is doing? I just wish he'd get it over with and charge whoever needs to be charged.

 

[Marshal Jim Duncan]

Who really knows what Mueller is doing? I just wish he'd get it over with and charge whoever needs to be charged.

Scrambling for something to save face, most likely.

 

[07pilt]

I wish the people that are so concerned about the deep state would start voting (and vetoing) like it. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/19/trump-surveillance-extension-351136

 

[HanAholeSolo2.0]

I wish the people that are so concerned about the deep state would start voting (and vetoing) like it. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/19/trump-surveillance-extension-351136

I don’t disagree.

 

[07pilt]

I don’t disagree.

Your lack of disagreement is not unwelcome.

 

[HighStickHarry]

Your lack of disagreement is not unwelcome.

How stoned are you?

 

[davidallen]

seems like s good place to drop this. @davidallen etc probably will focus on the source but this is a pretty tight summary of the counter narrative which I find holds up better to scrutiny by the day.

View embedded media

My issue with this narrative is it conveniently skips right past the inconvenient bits like Manafort, Flynn, et al. It glosses right over Don Jr. and his enthusiasm for unconventional, even illegal, assistance in the election, or that the timelines on many of the threads of the investigation go back well before the hatching of the grand conspiracy.

 

[HanAholeSolo2.0]

My issue with this narrative is it conveniently skips right past the inconvenient bits like Manafort, Flynn, et al. It glosses right over Don Jr. and his enthusiasm for unconventional, even illegal, assistance in the election, or that the timelines on many of the threads of the investigation go back well before the hatching of the grand conspiracy.

I appreciate the honest answer. this is more of a summary though. there is quite a bit of information and perspective on those things - in particular, Flynn.