ADVERTISEMENT

Obama’s Silky Lie

When he does stupid shit like lie all the time, should the media not report that? You see the utter hypocrisy in your statement, no?

Its hard to tell his lies, when the media blows every ounce of hyperbole into a full-blown disinformation campaign. Second, I don't take every failed campaign promise as a 'lie', unless he clearly said one thing and pushed the other. I'll read through the link to see more examples of his 'lies' although most of what I've seen have been pretty questionable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CBradSmith
No, I get emails all day every day from lawyers with non-government email addresses. I send secure emails all day from a non-governmental email address. Never been a problem, and we all have to take cyber-privacy seriously as part of legal ethics now. Why is a non-government address automatically non-secure?

What is it you're comparing here?
 
Is it your expectation that a POTUS communicate exclusively on one address? Should a SecState? Thinking non official things here....

Would there be some communication appropriate for a private channel? Just curious of your expectations here...

Yes. I would have no issue if DNC business was done under the Clinton email addresses. But government work should be worked through government emails to adhere to all policies and oversight.
 
Yes. I would have no issue if DNC business was done under the Clinton email addresses. But government work should be worked through government emails to adhere to all policies and oversight.
Is it clear which context Obama was operating in when he exchanged emails with HRC? Genuine question, have not read anything specific on this question.
 
This slow thing, it's not an act, huh?

Alf workin' the narrative:

CD8q2.gif
 
Alf workin' the narrative:

CD8q2.gif

I know you don't have the awareness to know, but that's all you do.

You react to any headline on a lib site like a trained seal. Not even clever enough to change the verbiage.

Pearl clutching is an example that you pulled directly on same day. Weird symbology to've stuck but it fits the picture.

Heal thyself weirdo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CBradSmith
Is it your expectation that a POTUS communicate exclusively on one address? Should a SecState? Thinking non official things here....

Would there be some communication appropriate for a private channel? Just curious of your expectations here...

Were they comparing yoga exercise routines and chatting about Chelsea's wedding?
 
Were they comparing yoga exercise routines and chatting about Chelsea's wedding?
Exchanging recipes maybe? Don't know, but curious.

The mere existence of a second email address doesn't mean in and of itself that Obama was lying about when he learned of the extent of Clinton's inappropriate use of a private email account (let alone a self hosted solution).

Those that think exchanging emails is tantamount to full knowledge of the scope of use and form of service of HRCs domain, yeah not so much IMO.
 
Is it clear which context Obama was operating in when he exchanged emails with HRC? Genuine question, have not read anything specific on this question.

i interpreted the findings as 13 people sent emails to that account regarding government work, including Obama. But maybe that's a misinterpretation on my part.
 
i interpreted the findings as 13 people sent emails to that account regarding government work, including Obama. But maybe that's a misinterpretation on my part.
Emails show Hillary aides lost their minds when Barry made his public statement about finding out about Clinton's emails from the media. Probably just an overreaction to innocuous things like yoga routines and wedding stuff.
 
I know you don't have the awareness to know, but that's all you do.

You react to any headline on a lib site like a trained seal. Not even clever enough to change the verbiage.

Pearl clutching is an example that you pulled directly on same day. Weird symbology to've stuck but it fits the picture.

Heal thyself weirdo.

Every time.

giphy.gif


Thanks for posting an article that deliberately confuses a non-governmental email address with a non-secure email address. Anybody that asks just isn't sheepy enough to participate in MAGA. LOL it's to the point it's entertaining, watching you post fake shit and your own articles blowing up in your face like Wile E. Coyote. Share some more answers, please. Don't stop now.
 
Thanks for posting an article that deliberately confuses a non-governmental email address with a non-secure email address.
Government policy has no bearing on any of this. They just put that stuff on paper to subsidize the lumber industry. Hillary and Obama also both signed Sensitive Compartment Information Nondisclosure Agreements, but that's just doodling on a silly document for their own amusement.

Let's stay focused on non sequitur to avoid talking about this frivolous policy and NDA nonsense.
 
Government policy has no bearing on any of this. They just put that stuff on paper to subsidize the lumber industry. Hillary and Obama also both signed Sensitive Compartment Information Nondisclosure Agreements, but that's just doodling on a silly document for their own amusement.

Let's stay focused on non sequitur to avoid talking about this frivolous policy and NDA nonsense.

Anything yet?
 
That’s your interpretation of me paying him to not be so stupid? I can put you on the rolls too, god knows, as the dumbest fn lawyer on the planet, you need it. Charity is my thing. I take care of the little people.

Rolls you up on the reg, as does about anybody that you disagree with. Sorry, but facts and sources trumps "Tweet!" and insults every time.
 
It’s not an insult if it’s true (decoder needed). You aren’t very good, you prove it here daily. My biggest mistake was thinking you were only a zip code or two away from Dave initially. Nope, not in his league. You and toon though, neighbors. Grats on the new runnin’ buddy.
 
It’s not an insult if it’s true (decoder needed). You aren’t very good, you prove it here daily. My biggest mistake was thinking you were only a zip code or two away from Dave initially. Nope, not in his league. You and toon though, neighbors. Grats on the new runnin’ buddy.

542.gif
 
"I send personal emails no problem. Why is the President any different?"

Don't need gif homie. You're what retarded people feel sorry for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
Keep up. Already discussed. Unless you have some content of the emails this is a big nothing burger.
Strangely enough, Obama had his emails with Clinton sealed by invoking presidential records privilege, so of course it's impossible for us to know the contents. It is interesting that executive privilege wouldn't shield the emails from disclosure if they were considered evidence in a criminal prosecution. Of course that's not probably an issue if there wasn't going to be a prosecution...
https://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-228607

This article talks about the OIG report in regards to Obama.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corn...l-report-directly-criticized-president-obama/

I don't know what kind of burger it is, but it certainly doesn't look like a nothing burger. There's definitely a pile of cheese on it.
 
Strangely enough, Obama had his emails with Clinton sealed by invoking presidential records privilege, so of course it's impossible for us to know the contents. It is interesting that executive privilege wouldn't shield the emails from disclosure if they were considered evidence in a criminal prosecution. Of course that's not probably an issue if there wasn't going to be a prosecution...
https://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-228607

This article talks about the OIG report in regards to Obama.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corn...l-report-directly-criticized-president-obama/

I don't know what kind of burger it is, but it certainly doesn't look like a nothing burger. There's definitely a pile of cheese on it.
Appreciate the links. Reading...
 
Strangely enough, Obama had his emails with Clinton sealed by invoking presidential records privilege, so of course it's impossible for us to know the contents. It is interesting that executive privilege wouldn't shield the emails from disclosure if they were considered evidence in a criminal prosecution. Of course that's not probably an issue if there wasn't going to be a prosecution...
https://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-228607

This article talks about the OIG report in regards to Obama.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corn...l-report-directly-criticized-president-obama/

I don't know what kind of burger it is, but it certainly doesn't look like a nothing burger. There's definitely a pile of cheese on it.

Well don't quit now. Keep digging.
 
Well don't quit now. Keep digging.
Keep digging? This crap has been in the media for quite some time. The OIG report fills in a few gaps, but Obama made sure his email communication with Hillary wouldn't be released. That's certainly his privilege as CIC, but in light of his statements about not knowing anything about it, it comes off as kinda shady. You can say whatever you want when you know nobody can find the truth.
 
Appreciate the links. Reading...
Certainly no smoking guns, but I didn't expect any without anybody having access to the Obama emails. Even with access, it's probably just more of the same that has already been discussed in regards to classified material.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT