ADVERTISEMENT

NS--70 Years on Throne--QEII--Total Badass--God Save The Queen!!!

CowboyUp

MegaPoke is insane
Gold Member
May 29, 2001
26,055
6,698
113
Austin Tx
XGgq5s1.jpg


solpRic.jpg
0X3ZB7z.jpg
 
God Save The Queen!

Seventy years on the throne, a magnificent accomplishment. A great Queen who has served her peoples well.
 
I’m a fan.

She will be the last Queen for a few generations. May be at least 60-70 years.
Yes, if the line of succession remains unchanged, Great Britain will have at least three Kings to follow Queen Elizabeth. I for one hope Prince Charles takes the regal name of King George VII.

Great Britain will however have Queen Consorts if their wives remain healthy. It is clear now that Camilla will be crowned Queen Camilla upon the ascension of her husband.
 
Nope. We’re good. Hell, a lot of the British population doesn’t like the monarchy.
Actually, we aren't good. Not at all. Some of our problems could be solved if we had a constitutional monarchy. I think most Americans would be shocked at how more unified we would be as a people if we had a King or Queen.

Monarchism also remains very popular in Great Britain. There is a little support for a republic, as there always has been, but overall, support for the monarch in Great Britian remains very high. As it always will. A constitutional monarchy is superior to a republic in my opinion.

 
Last edited:
Actually, we aren't good. Not at all. Some of our problems could be solved if we had a constitutional monarchy. I think most Americans would be shocked at how more unified we would be as a people if we had a King or Queen.

Monarchism also remains very popular in Great Britain. There is a little support for a republic, as there always has been, but overall, support for the monarch in Great Britian remains very high. As it always will. A constitutional monarchy is superior to a republic in my opinion.


Cripes, just when one thinks the bottom of the barrel has been scraped...... :eek:
 
Actually, we aren't good. Not at all. Some of our problems could be solved if we had a constitutional monarchy. I think most Americans would be shocked at how more unified we would be as a people if we had a King or Queen.

Monarchism also remains very popular in Great Britain. There is a little support for a republic, as there always has been, but overall, support for the monarch in Great Britian remains very high. As it always will. A constitutional monarchy is superior to a republic in my opinion.

Nope. We’re good.
 
God Save The Queen!

Seventy years on the throne, a magnificent accomplishment. A great Queen who has served her peoples well.
Actually, we aren't good. Not at all. Some of our problems could be solved if we had a constitutional monarchy. I think most Americans would be shocked at how more unified we would be as a people if we had a King or Queen.

Monarchism also remains very popular in Great Britain. There is a little support for a republic, as there always has been, but overall, support for the monarch in Great Britian remains very high. As it always will. A constitutional monarchy is superior to a republic in my opinion.

It's bedtime CowboyUp. Go get some sleep.

Not @CowboyUp.

@brtinla is my bet.

Probably got banned under his original account.

Maybe on some calming meds.

Let’s ask him about Catholicism.
 
Last edited:
Not @CowboyUp.

@brtinla is my bet.

Probably got banned under his original account.

Maybe on some calming meds.

Let’s ask him about Catholicism.

I'll take your word for it. A question though. Does he really believe what he posts? Or is this just a really ineffective and failed troll job? In my entire life, I never met an American who wants a monarchy. Very eccentric.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
I'll take your word for it. A question though. Does he really believe what he posts? Or is this just a really ineffective and failed troll job? In my entire life, I never met an American who wants a monarchy. Very eccentric.
I'm not a troll if that is what you think. I've been a member of this site for almost two years now.

There are a number of Americans who support a monarch. A number of organizations have existed and do exist that contain American supporters of monarchism. There have also been supporters of some form of an American monarchy stretching back to the founders. This is not a new concept in this country.
 
I'm not a troll if that is what you think. I've been a member of this site for almost two years now.

There are a number of Americans who support a monarch. A number of organizations have existed and do exist that contain American supporters of monarchism. There have also been supporters of some form of an American monarchy stretching back to the founders. This is not a new concept in this country.
Member of the site for almost two years....that has no idea who brt is and only started using the account to start posting yesterday.

I smell socks.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: JimmyBob
Actually, we aren't good. Not at all. Some of our problems could be solved if we had a constitutional monarchy. I think most Americans would be shocked at how more unified we would be as a people if we had a King or Queen.

As clearly demonstrated by Brexit, right? :p

In reality, the UK has been blessed by having a benevolent, mostly non-partisan Queen for the past 70 years, but that's not guaranteed. Prince Harry is "burned out" just being a part-time royal, living in his multi-million dollar mansion in LA surrounded by his millionaire buddies. Can you imagine if he had to actually DO the royal job. Do you think he would be a "uniter" of the UK peoples with his constant wokism?

But its fascinating to see you Dems line up and wish such dictators upon us as better than our system of Constitutional Representation in government.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CoastGuardCowboy
The future king gets the same pass Bill Clinton gets here.

His ties to the biggest (known) perv in England are swatted down by a captured press.
 
The future king gets the same pass Bill Clinton gets here.

His ties to the biggest (known) perv in England are swatted down by a captured press.
Agree, although I do think that the future king's indiscretions are a big reason the current Queen hasn't abdicated to this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alpha Woke
As clearly demonstrated by Brexit, right? :p

In reality, the UK has been blessed by having a benevolent, mostly non-partisan Queen for the past 70 years, but that's not guaranteed. Prince Harry is "burned out" just being a part-time royal, living in his multi-million dollar mansion in LA surrounded by his millionaire buddies. Can you imagine if he had to actually DO the royal job. Do you think he would be a "uniter" of the UK peoples with his constant wokism?

But its fascinating to see you Dems line up and wish such dictators upon us as better than our system of Constitutional Representation in government.
I am not a Democrat. I am also not wishing for a dictator. I abhor dictatorships and believe that the absence of a monarch if what often leads to a dictator.

I worry that we are on the road towards a dictatorship in this country. That is one reason I support reforming our system to a constitutional monarchy.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: CowboyJD
The future king gets the same pass Bill Clinton gets here.

His ties to the biggest (known) perv in England are swatted down by a captured press.
Are you referring to Charles or Phillip?
 
Agree, although I do think that the future king's indiscretions are a big reason the current Queen hasn't abdicated to this point.
The Queen of England has not abdicated because of her oath and promise to her peoples. It has nothing to do with Prince Charles. The Prince's time will come in due course, if he is destined to wear the crown.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT