I thought they obliterated the target. That’s what our Dear Leader told us. Did he lie to us? Say it ain’t so!
Is this a case where DJT FAFO that his bunker busters aren’t?“Sources say”. 😂😂😂😂
I’m going to sit back and watch DACO Dan run from another one of his fųckup threads.
![]()
Sources say “no”.Is this a case where DJT FAFO that his bunker busters aren’t?
He's still avoiding providing any credible source that backs up his claim that Israel stole“Sources say”. 😂😂😂😂
I’m going to sit back and watch DACO Dan run from another one of his fųckup threads.
![]()
He's still avoiding providing any credible source that backs up his claim that Israel stolenuclear weaponsenriched uranium from the US. Three threads, three bitch outs.
Dan, did you actually read that?
Yes, of course I read it. I found the first sentence in the second paragraph to be captivating.Dan, did you actually read that?
And why should anyone who reduced entire countries and the people who lived in them to rubble get credit for it? Do you have any idea how sick what you wrote is?DJT replaced Sarah Palin as the most attacked politician by MSM ever. Trump could reduce Iran and Russia to burned out cinders and would get not a milligram of credit from the Main Stream Media.
And why should anyone who reduced entire countries and the people who lived in them to rubble get credit for it?
How far away from having nuclear weapons is poor little timid Israel?We can't have enough disgust for the leftist media. Days before the attack Iran was three years from obtaining nuclear weapons, after the attack a mere months.
I never thought I would see people in this country openly supporting a nuclear arms race in the Middle East but here we are.How far away from having nuclear weapons is poor little timid Israel?
Why does that matter?How far away from having nuclear weapons is poor little timid Israel?
Dan, that's yet another article that offers more speculation, not proof.Yes, of course I read it. I found the first sentence in the second paragraph to be captivating.
Based on your post you've assume the strike mission was a failure and the nuclear site didn't sustain enough damage for it to be considered destroyed. While we are still waiting to see results of the strike can you provide what damage it would take for you to consider the site destroyed?I thought they obliterated the target. That’s what our Dear Leader told us. Did he lie to us? Say it ain’t so!
Of course the article is speculative, the truth has been squirreled away in a triple locked top secret hidden fortress protected by a US government that is ruled by the government of Israel. You will meet your Maker before the truth is revealed. If there was proof it was not stolen we would have been provided with it decades ago. The fact that everything said or written has been speculative should send a red flag to one and all.Dan, that's yet another article that offers more speculation, not proof.
Is it possible that material was diverted from the Apollo plant to Israel at the direction of Shapiro? Absolutely yes. Shapiro was a big supporter of all things Israel, including Israel developing nukes for deterrence.
Have you bothered putting the same effort into reading about other plausible explanations for the material loss that are in the public domain, or do you only read things that confirm your bias against Israel? I'll give you one to consider for starters. Apollo isn't the only facility that had nuclear material go missing. Take a look at this article from 1977.
Have you explored other plausible explanations?Of course the article is speculative, the truth has been squirreled away in a triple locked top secret hidden fortress protected by a US government that is ruled by the government of Israel. You will meet your Maker before the truth is revealed. If there was proof it was not stolen we would have been provided with it decades ago. The fact that everything said or written has been speculative should send a red flag to one and all.
Let me ask you: does Israel have nukes? Can you prove it has nukes by the public literature? No, I don’t think you can. We all know Israel has nukes, but we can’t prove it. This is a similar situation.
Is it your opinion that the US government should have the final say on which foreign country can have nuclear weapons, and which should not? That would be convenient.Why does that matter?
No. Do you think Israel has nuclear weapons? If you do can you point to the classified literature that proves it? Classified literature recently leaked shows the 30,000 bombs, if they were really used (there’s lots of speculation they weren’t), didn’t have the effect we were assured by Trump and his puppet master, Netanyahu, destroyed Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Can you speculate why there has been no leak proving Israel has (or doesn’t have) nuclear weapons, or Israel did (or didn’t) steal weapons grade nuclear materials? Without proof, honest to God irrefutable proof, should the rest of the world operate under the assumption Israel is nuke-free?Have you explored other plausible explanations?
As the world's leading super power, your GD right we have the not only the right but the moral duty to determine who does and does not have nuclear weapons. The fact you don't have a problem with a nation that is unquestionably proven to be the world's largest supporter of terrorism and declared death to Israel and the US is beyond insane.Is it your opinion that the US government should have the final say on which foreign country can have nuclear weapons, and which should not? That would be convenient.
As I said it’s very convenient we have assigned to ourselves the “moral duty” to determine who else besides us can pursue nuclear energy.As the world's leading super power, your GD right we have the not only the right but the moral duty to determine who does and does not have nuclear weapons. The fact you don't have a problem with a nation that is unquestionably proven to be the world's largest supporter of terrorism and declared death to Israel and the US is beyond insane.
That's readily apparent. People with strong prejudice tend to ignore things that challenge their biased beliefs. Your choice of language is a dead giveaway.
I'm sure they do. I've read about the Dimona project. But I don't care. Israel doesn't have a repeatedly stated policy goal of annihilation of the USA.Do you think Israel has nuclear weapons?
I consider mine to be an intellectual investment, not so much emotional. But I can see why my OCD could be looked at as emotional. Israel may not have a publicly stated goal to annihilate the USA, but its actions are sure leading us down that path!I'm sure they do. I've read about the Dimona project. But I don't care. Israel doesn't have a repeatedly stated policy goal of annihilation of the USA.
It's clear a major difference between you and I is that I don't get emotionally invested in things I have no control over.
Old Pete’s giving himself time to formulate the perfect spin. DJT is not permitted to fail, not permitted to be perceived as failing at anything.
Dan, an intellectual investment would lead you to explore other things outside of your already settled beliefs.I consider mine to be an intellectual investment, not so much emotional. But I can see why my OCD could be looked at as emotional. Israel may not have a publicly stated goal to annihilate the USA, but its actions are sure leading us down that path!
What a lazy and dishonest portrayal of reality. Do you work for Iran supporting their terrorism around the globe or are you so deeply indoctrinated with anti-Semitism you will allow anything to destroy Israel?As I said it’s very convenient we have assigned to ourselves the “moral duty” to determine who else besides us can pursue nuclear energy.
I would argue that the USA is the world’s leading practitioner of terrorism, not least because we support the unrivaled terrorist nation in the Middle East, Israel.
Please point out a time I said I want anyone to have nuclear weapons. I don't hate Israel, I hate Zionism. No matter how many times you accuse me of anti-Semitism and Israel hatred it still won't be true. America *is without question* the world's leading practitioner of terrorism. Its support of Israel, the leading practitioner of terrorism in the Middle East is only one aspect of America's malfeasance (although a very big aspect).What a lazy and dishonest portrayal of reality. Do you work for Iran supporting their terrorism around the globe or are you so deeply indoctrinated with anti-Semitism you will allow anything to destroy Israel?
I know you hate Israel but that doesn't justify in any way support of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons.
Of course you would argue America is the worlds largest terrorist, it supports Israel. Your hatred of Israel is well documented.
Actions Dan, they don't lie.Please point out a time I said I want anyone to have nuclear weapons. I don't hate Israel, I hate Zionism. No matter how many times you accuse me of anti-Semitism and Israel hatred it still won't be true. America *is without question* the world's leading practitioner of terrorism. Its support of Israel, the leading practitioner of terrorism in the Middle East is only one aspect of America's malfeasance (although a very big aspect).
I couldn't agree more. America's and Israel's actions are the actions of a hegemon desperate to maintain control by any actions available to them. Terrorism has worked very well for them both. But a little birdie tells me things changed after the hegemon got punched back as hard as they punched. The world finally got to see a little fright from the two bullies.Actions Dan, they don't lie.
Yes. That would be more than convenient. It would be in my best interest as an American.Is it your opinion that the US government should have the final say on which foreign country can have nuclear weapons, and which should not? That would be convenient.