News Must Not Be Too Good
- Thread starter Marshal Jim Duncan
- Start date
They don’t normally make them public, instead they may release a redacted report.
and the cross eyed idiot with the wacky glasses said it needed to be released as the repubs were hiding something.....
What's sad is while I would like to see this done transparantly and open, I agree with her. Anyone who says that they saw nothing, will be given death threats by the radicals on the left and anyone who says he clearly was a drunken loser will get death threats from the radicals on the right. Simply too many individuals who lack simple decorum required for a true free society where people can respectfully have different viewpoints. Probably why we keep inching closer to socialism so the government can protect us.
Agreed 100%. This has been handled as stupidly as possible from the beginning. There's no need to continue handling it stupidly.
There's no reason to expose the people caught in the middle to the freaks from either side. To the best of my knowledge, they didn't put any of the other background checks out for public consumption.
If you only had the ability to comprehend what you read...
So speaketh the senile bitch whose Depends leaked Ford's identify; thanks for playing - that is - if you can remember it.
Read the last sentence with the least amount of dumbassery that you can muster...
Then relate it to the rest of his post.
- Bash left
- Bash right
- socialism copout BS
It’s illogical to not call yourself a socialist. Don’t be a fvcking idiot. If you pay taxes to pay for teachers, police, fire, roads, bridges, parks, etc.....you’re a socialist lol.
Don’t like the label? Sack the fvck up and deal with it.
That's not being a socialist...
The problem with this is that do you trust that if the FBI found no evidence of the assualt, yet they kept the details of the investigation private, that the Democratic leaders would accept it and state that they accept the findings? I don't. I truly believe you'd have Kamala Harris sending out emails asking for fundraising based on the 'undisclosed' findings of a corrupt FBI. And if there are details that lead to BK withdrawing, you'd have Trump tweeting about how left-wingers are in control of the FBI and tilting the process with sham investigations on Hillary and other dems while unfettered while searching for every possible wrongdoing a republican has ever committed
This can't be true. During the hearing she turned to her staff and asked if they leaked Ford's letter. They all swore with their butts on the cushions of their chairs and under penalty of job loss they didn't.So speaketh the senile bitch whose Depends leaked Ford's identify; thanks for playing - that is - if you can remember it.
It's stupid shit like this that equates public services paid for willingly by citizens through a tax process approved by those that pay taxes as socialism.
It scares the crap out of me that morons and know nothing young people taught by morons don't know shit about socialism and think public services should include free everything.
Which of course isn't even close to free because it has to taken from productive people, by force if necessary and redistributed to morons who think socialism is a good thing.
Are you debating whether or not as a society we are inching closer to socialism? I didn't call you a socialist. I didn't even disparage leftists. Yet you seem to have taken that sentence as an attack against you and your ideology.
Why are you doing this? Why are you trying rationalize with the irrational? What’s your end game?
The 302's the Judiciary Committee receives from the FBI will be leaked as soon as staffers receive a copy...or Jeff Flake is nabbed in an elevator by a Soros paid operative.
At least its discussion. All I can get from the other way-lefty on the board are emojis.
The others threw in the towel. They tried to defend the indefensible and couldn’t. These two current quacks don’t have the cognitive function to realize when they are beaten. You can’t win an argument with a toon town. It’s like winning a boxing match against a bowl of cooked spaghetti. He just gets smashed and sits there looking at you asking for more.
And the unaware and compliant citizenry he wrote about is content to remain unaware and compliant even with it in print.
Bill Ivey, the head of the taxpayer-funded National Endowment for the Arts during Bill Clinton’s second term — wrote to John Podesta that they’ve been: “content to produce an unaware and compliant citizenry.”
Source: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3599
Bill Ivey:
This is the NEA:
https://www.arts.gov/
This inspired jfk jr to become Q.
Hahahaha
(But seriously, what part of the brain shuts down I order to assume that position?)
Oh and Hahahahahahaha at Toon = smashed spaghetti asking to be smashed more.
There are many who equate taxation with theft.
Don’t know if taxes paid under threat of criminal prosecution are actually paid willingly.
Public services provided by the government do have a socialistic/socialism element to them, BUT the fact that they exist doesn’t mean we are a socialism system of government as a whole.
We can talk taxes for a hundred years but they were put in place by duly elected representatives.
I just find it ridiculous that essential public services are proof that we are socialists and we need to have more socialism.
I just find it ridiculous that essential public services are proof that we are socialists and we need to have more socialism.
Last edited:
Such a simple concept, but so difficult for someone here grasp. Any thoughts on what the over/under would be on the length of time it would train a parrot to say your post?
I’ve said before our government is a blend is socialism and capitalism, but to deny the socialist elements are just righty talking points because a harmless moniker offends them so...
Being part of a blended economy/government system doesn’t make one a “socialist”.
I dunno...ask NZ how long it took him to learn to parrot the talking points of his handlers.
That’s probably a pretty good indication.
