ADVERTISEMENT

National Climate Emergency

And just what are the 2 Socialists AOC and Bernie doing about it?
Are they using alternative means of travel? How is Bernie getting to all the locations he is Campaigning in? Train? Bicycle? Pelosi's broom?
What is AOC doing? She is filling up her Luxury Apartment with Ikea furniture. How did her Ikea get delivered to her? Pack Mules?
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
And just what are the 2 Socialists AOC and Bernie doing about it?
Are they using alternative means of travel? How is Bernie getting to all the locations he is Campaigning in? Train? Bicycle? Pelosi's broom?
What is AOC doing? She is filling up her Luxury Apartment with Ikea furniture. How did her Ikea get delivered to her? Pack Mules?
Bernies carbon footprint?

It's only exceeded by Dow Chemical.
 
There are so many aspects of Climate change science that many individual parts can be debunked, but as a whole as I said it is common sense......it is kind of like looking at the Big Bang........more happened in the first second than has happened in the 13.82 Billion years since, so scientist can question many things from that first second, but it does not make the entire theory incorrect
So much wrong in this post it's not even worth trying to correct you. You are a lost cause.
 
So much wrong in this post it's not even worth trying to correct you. You are a lost cause.
you can have your opinion....I happen to believe that Human's are causing problems with the Climate, but as I have said many times, the alarmist are just as bad as the deniers..........BTW......The Big Bang did happen, the proof is overwhelming
 
you can have your opinion....I happen to believe that Human's are causing problems with the Climate, but as I have said many times, the alarmist are just as bad as the deniers..........BTW......The Big Bang did happen, the proof is overwhelming
Please tell me the difference between micro evolution vs. macro evolution. Then compare and contrast that to micro green house effect and macro global warming.

I'll take my answer off the air.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wyomingosualum
Please tell me the difference between micro evolution vs. macro evolution. Then compare and contrast that to micro green house effect and macro global warming.

I'll take my answer off the air.
It's only those with egos large enough to be floats in the Macy parade believe mankind can damage the planet, or have any realistic ability to fix it. BS flag on that cowflop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
Please tell me the difference between micro evolution vs. macro evolution. Then compare and contrast that to micro green house effect and macro global warming.

I'll take my answer off the air.
Not my area of expertise, I could make an educated guess, but it would take more time than I have.... if you can answer in 1000 words or less....go for it
 
When China's 1.4 Billion folks & in fact any other nation's billions of people want to get serious about doing a damned thing to do anything about the planet and takes any initiative without the US holding their hands and leading the way, I'm on board. We are tapped out with everything else on the plate at the moment to worry about the bartender's handlers' programs
 
And just what are the 2 Socialists AOC and Bernie doing about it?
Are they using alternative means of travel? How is Bernie getting to all the locations he is Campaigning in? Train? Bicycle? Pelosi's broom?
What is AOC doing? She is filling up her Luxury Apartment with Ikea furniture. How did her Ikea get delivered to her? Pack Mules?
Well, Bernie is getting assistance from the most recent democrat candidate to enter the frey.

Tom Steyer, the billionaire wacko environmental zealot replaced the dropped out moron Swalwell in the dems race to the bottom of the sewer. Of course, they will never tell you that Steyer obtained his billions in the coal industry.

Funny how all these dems hyperventilate about the ills of the world but only after hypocritically exploiting those "ills" for personal gain.
 
you can have your opinion....I happen to believe that Human's are causing problems with the Climate, but as I have said many times, the alarmist are just as bad as the deniers..........BTW......The Big Bang did happen, the proof is overwhelming

What climate problems are humans causing the planet? Don't lump me as a denier into the morons that are alarmist. I'm not making speeches for 6 or 7 figures to play the crowd. My problem with the MMGW group is they have no fundamental set of parameters by which to gauge their dire warnings, they don't share their programing and variables to test repeatability and their only solution is to TAX everything. Sorry not buying it. They also make predictions (except the moron AOC) that these changes will have catastrophic effects 100 years from now (that's 4 generations). Go back 100 years from today and look at the advances REAL science has made and tell me with a straight face that 100 years from now advances won't negate any real/perceived issues.

I know of no one who purposely goes out to harm the planet, but there are certain and unadulterated facts of life....CO2 emissions will never be 0, ever. What have the studies shown will happen if we get to 0 as far as vegetation, moisture, etc. Can promise that those cause and effect studies have never been done. This is all about killing off a carbon based energy supply and raising monies via TAXATION.

What predictions about global warming have come true? From the UN, to scientists, to the 99% of climate scientist agree farce every time something weather related happens it is either a direct or tertiary result of climate change, the goal posts have been moved so many times there are no new fresh pieces of ground left to dig new holes to set said goal posts. These changes have taken place over the eons and will continue to do so. What was the CO2 atmospheric content during the last mini-ice age? Promise it wasn't zero. Sunspots, or the lack thereof are key to climatic changes.

If you look at Australia right now the people in say Victoria are paying way more for NG (most of their power is derived from this) than say in Western Australia or Queensland. Want to know why? Because the government in Victoria (Melbourne) won't allow new PROVEN reserves to be extracted. The net effect is that businesses are leaving Victoria because power costs are so high, citizens are wanting government subsidized relief and they experience blackouts from time to time. Australia has a very safe record of NG extraction and use, yet the environmentalists (all usually wearing carbon based products from head to toe) protest relentlessly.

The plastics and other garbage being dumped in the oceans are of a far greater threat then climate change.

You've been in Europe too long, enjoy your electric cars and the unicorns that pull them, along with all the taxes that will be associated to have a green life. Oh and those tires your electric car will be riding on will also be of a carbon based nature...unless they are wood.
 
Last edited:
What climate problems are humans causing the planet? Don't lump me as a denier into the morons that are alarmist. I'm not making speeches for 6 or 7 figures to play the crowd. My problem with the MMGW group is they have no fundamental set of parameters by which to gauge their dire warnings, they don't share their programing and variables to test repeatability and their only solution is to TAX everything. Sorry not buying it. They also make predictions (except the moron AOC) that these changes will have catastrophic effects 100 years from now (that's 4 generations). Go back 100 years from today and look at the advances REAL science has made and tell me with a straight face that 100 years from now advances won't negate any real/perceived issues.

I know of no one who purposely goes out to harm the planet, but there are certain and unadulterated facts of life....CO2 emissions will never be 0, ever. What have the studies shown will happen if we get to 0 as far as vegetation, moisture, etc. Can promise that those cause and effect studies have never been done. This is all about killing off a carbon based energy supply and raising monies via TAXATION.

What predictions about global warming have come true? From the UN, to scientists, to the 99% of climate scientist agree farce every time something weather related happens it is either a direct or tertiary result of climate change, the goal posts have been moved so many times there are no new fresh pieces of ground left to dig new holes to set said goal posts. These changes have taken place over the eons and will continue to do so. What was the CO2 atmospheric u destroy its natural filtering system during the last mini-ice age? Promise it wasn't zero. Sunspots, or the lack thereof are key to climatic changes.

If you look at Australia right now the people in say Victoria are paying way more for NG (most of their power is derived from this) than say in Western Australia or Queensland. Want to know why? Because the government in Victoria (Melbourne) won't allow new PROVEN reserves to be extracted. The net effect is that businesses are leaving Victoria because power costs are so high, citizens are wanting government subsidized relief and they experience blackouts from time to time. Australia has a very safe record of NG extraction and use, yet the environmentalists (all usually wearing carbon based products from head to toe) protest relentlessly.

The plastics and other garbage being dumped in the oceans are of a far greater threat then climate change.

You've been in Europe too long, enjoy your electric cars and the unicorns that pull them, along with all the taxes that will be associated to have a green life. Oh and those tires your electric car will be riding on will also be of a carbon based nature...unless they are wood.
So......explain to me the common sense of this..........if you have a closed system , and you pump a bunch of cr@p into it, while you destroy its natural filtering system.......what happens?
 
The only thing man can do on a global scale to deliberately and irreparably harm the planet is global thermonuclear war.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
So......explain to me the common sense of this..........if you have a closed system , and you pump a bunch of cr@p into it, while you destroy its natural filtering system.......what happens?
It isn't a closed system. Unless you are counting the sun in that system. Which is a stretch.
Explain how the natural filtering system has been destroyed. In fact the filtering system may be even more robust due to having more to filter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
It isn't a closed system. Unless you are counting the sun in that system. Which is a stretch.
Explain how the natural filtering system has been destroyed. In fact the filtering system may be even more robust due to having more to filter.
Deforestation
 
So......explain to me the common sense of this..........if you have a closed system , and you pump a bunch of cr@p into it, while you destroy its natural filtering system.......what happens?

The environment is not a closed system....and in the alarmist world we are only pumping one item in the atmosphere that will destroy the planet and that is CO2. What is the other "crap" you are talking about?

Deforestation is a gigantic myth as well. Man you need to come up with something that has some teeth. When the planet starts to cool off, what will be the excuse?

Approximately 72% of Oklahoma was in some type of drought condition 2 years ago....now its 0%, the drought was toughed as proof positive global warming, what is the excuse for the moisture to take us out of the drought? There is so much chicanery going on with data manipulation it amazes me people, a lot of very intelligent people, don't ask simple questions about obvious flaws in the methodology. Weather stations/temperature gauges that use to be in the country are now in urban areas...and guess what the temperature goes up, wow shocking stuff! Then the new readings are used to adjust old readings.....totally different situations.

What has happened climatically, in the last 20 years that has never happened before, in the history of the planet?
 
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nly_tells_the_truth_about_global_warming.html

“The very idea that we can stop climate change is barking mad. Climate change is inevitable, as geology has always shown.” These are the views of New Zealand lecturer of geology, David Shelley. A person vastly more competent than me and the flotilla of others telling the kids the world is going to end from global warming."
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
If global warming was a truism wouldn't we have more Summers of 1980 more frequently than 39 years and counting?

Maybe someone will invent a small CO2 scrubber mask all 8 billion people can wear to reduce the CO2 we all liberate with normal human activity. However, trying to get all other forms of life that liberate carbon to comply might be difficult not to mention the demise of much of the natural plant scrubbers already here that would result. Perhaps we should stop flying airplanes, blasting rockets through the atmosphere, driving cars, prohibit forest fires, cap all volcanoes and put a giant tarp over the oceans to reduce other sources of CO2. While we're at it, let's impose total celibacy on the world to eliminate future carbon pollution. Mother Earth is marvelously design to regulate and cure her ills, even from many of the above, if she's allowed to function.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
Damn, what a great summer to live in Dallas; remember it all too well.:eek:
I missed it. I was in Houston with 105 degrees and 99% humidity. We (I worked with Customs/Immigration then) were not permitted to board ships to inspect after lunch each day due to the heat from the metal which literally melted some shoe soles. Those same ships which sat at docks full of oil unable to unload due to Jimmy Carter's foolish and contrived gas shortage.
 
I have no idea why no one is advocating for fourth trimester abortions. Planned parenthood could open an international wing called planned population.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wyomingosualum
I have no idea why no one is advocating for fourth trimester abortions. Planned parenthood could open an international wing called planned population.
Doesn't allowing a baby to come full term and then killing them after birth qualify as a 4th trimester abortion? Or is that just murder?
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT