Fair enough. I just didn't see you posting similar when the Dems were doing it to the Repubs when the rolls were reversed. Maybe I missed it.
But I agree with you. The Dems are just background noise at this point.
Multi-racial woman wears 'Pro-Trump' dress to Grammy's
- Thread starter NZ Poke
- Start date
But I agree with you. The Dems are just background noise at this point.
Yes, that is correct. Diaper wearing titty babies. This isn't a new concept.
And it's your position that the children (Diaper wearing titty babies) are winning the day?
Nope, hence the non-stop crying. The lefty children are being spanked for their stupidity. Hildacanklesbeast lost. 0bama helped himself to a majority of Republican governorships and state legislatures. And the House. And the Senate. And now, the Presidency.
The tears are only flowing from the ideologues who thought identity politics mattered to smart people.
Admit it. She's hot in an Ann Coulter kind of way.
Nope, winning is happening without the anchors of stupidity that the ass clown 0bama of the past 8 years tried to pitch. You're white, and liberal, and only give a shit about yourself, so this shouldn't be a difficult concept for you. Portland is so many shades of white it looks like an albino convention!
I don't recall them Dems suspending committee rules regarding quorums.
Enlighten me.
When Dems were in control....and regarding Obama's EOs....I did say repeated that you should engage in power plays and power grappling that you aren't comfortable with the other side having. Can't imagine why you might have missed that unless you just weren't paying attention.
Nuclear option. The Reid plan. Pandora's box. Now it's like Hellraiser. The freaks can do as they wish.
Mostly give a shit about my family. After that extended family. Then friends.
Sorry dude you are about 10th on the list. Maybe we can connect outside this cess pool and see if you can rise up a couple of notches. Until then **** off.
The solid brass balls this woman has are pretty impressive.
Which of those were actually followed through on? Reid plan? Nuclear option?
Or did they end up compromising?
Even then, as I said....
The freaks have the power to do as the wish. Someday the snowflakes might be in charge again though.....inexorable march to authoritarianism by consent of both parties.....we won, deal with it..,,elections have consequences....crap no one really cares about until they are out of power.....yada yada yada.
That's two terms that refer to the same thing, the changing of Senate rules for judicial confirmations.
Man my post came off/out completely wrong. I apologize for that post @davidallen. I can't even tell you what my intended jab actually was at this point. Not an excuse, but I was dead tired, it was late, I was cranky because I couldn't sleep.
Now your 9th. The OU thing though is a big limit of how far this can go though.
@davidallen is a smug liberal who is so used to losing, he wouldn't know winning if it punched him in his arrogant ass. You lost buddy. Acceptance is key and give the guy a chance. He's been in office less than 1 month. Sheesh. I will edit this post to say that he may be smug, but he's also one of the only few libs I don't have on the ignore list.
I get that. Did they, in fact, change the Senate rules for judicial confirmations?
Thanks for that, but I thought New York Times was "fake news".
So confusing.
Either way, reap what you sow is certainly in order here. As is my prior advice that you probably shouldn't acquire and exercise power that you are uncomfortable having used against you when the political tide shifts in favor of your "enemies". I was saying that then, and I'm saying it now.
There is unbiased news, biased news, and fake news. The NYT opinion page is slanted so far left it makes David look conservative.
Unfortunately yes, except for the Supreme Court (just around the corner). Reid even stated that he knew the stakes as Republicans would be able to use that moving forward if they were ever back in control of the Senate. I'm not sure he expected that to happen so soon.
9th is OK at this point. That's higher than I am on my wife's list.
If losing includes a happy family, 10 wins by my Pokes, an exit to Google, and an IRR of 28% for the VC I work with - then I want to lose again this year!
Yes, quite the liberal.
So who are you today? A John Bircher? Alan Alda? Santa?
Around 30. A couple of semi-auto rifles that should probably be restricted. You'd know this had you ever shot them.
Gloria Steinem? Steve Bannon? Easter Bunny? Who today?
I've never claimed to be a liberal. Not a title that's ever been part of my resume. I know this might be a difficult concept for a binary thinker like you, but give it a shot. What's the worst that could happen? Nobody can take your birthday, Cupcake.
You got any banana clips for those assault weapons, Sir Hypocrit? I own several and have shot many semi auto rifles over the years. Only a bonafide pussy would think they should be restricted.
