ADVERTISEMENT

Multi-racial woman wears 'Pro-Trump' dress to Grammy's

NZ Poke

Heisman Candidate
Dec 16, 2007
6,088
7,047
113
Watch the head explosions / meltdowns when they can't call her "racist" or "sexist"...... (She's black / American Indian / Italian American --- and born in Southern California)

What a glorious moment.....she's far more rebellious than any celebrity towing the line.




 
o-JOY-VILLA-570.jpg


Last year's Grammy "dress".

She does have a unique fashion sense, clearly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
The first tweet cited in the article posted and linked....and the only one cited that had any kind of a death threat came from......

Wait for it.....

An apparent Trump supporter that was sarcastically making fun of the left and how they would respond.

in reply to @Harley_joey_168


10mJake R.‏ @jaker1419
@Harley_joey_168 Fine, I deleted it, so you morons stop confusing me with violent LWNJS.
in reply to @TheMoviePunk


14mJake R.‏ @jaker1419
@TheMoviePunk It wasn't real - it was supposed to be hyperbolic progressive reaction (that turned out to be to real).

 
All of the "winning" will happen in the hate filled speeches to be given tonight so they can all cheer for each other and feel that America really cares what they think. I wonder what happened to "acceptance" and building bridges, not walls between people with different views? JK, I already know the answer(s).
 
All of the "winning" will happen in the hate filled speeches to be given tonight so they can all cheer for each other and feel that America really cares what they think.
Is somebody keeping score? Busy night and day tomorrow- looking forward to Cliffs Notes version of the winning...
 
I understood the winning to start on day one and be so frequent and impressive that I would become fatigued with all the winning. Clearly I misunderstood.
Hard to make it day one when the opposition party is voting "no" in an historical amount just on cabinet members.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
Hard to make it day one when the opposition party is voting "no" in an historical amount just on cabinet members.

Not that hard when you have a full majority and the willingness to suspend committee rules requiring a quorum to vote and you're busy writing EOs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
Not that hard when you have a full majority and the willingness to suspend committee rules requiring a quorum to vote and you're busy writing EOs.

They walked out. Twice. Had every opportunity to make their voice heard.
 
They walked out. Twice. Had every opportunity to make their voice heard.

I wasn't being critical of the decision. I was responding to your claim that it's hard to make it day one due to onstructionism of the left when that obstructionism seems to me to be wholly ineffective so far.
 
Is the GOP that inept? They can't handle this tenacious minority? Or perhaps they have their own agenda. Hmmmmm....
So your suggesting they use force to make Dems attend meetings???
Adults sometimes lets children suffer the results of their temper-tantrum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
I forget, did Republicans just line up and give Barry whatever he wanted?

No of course not. But if you don't want Republicans to have the ability to run roughshod over the Democrats in both chambers of Congress then don't elect them to majorities in both.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AC_Exotic
So your suggesting they use force to make Dems attend meetings???
Adults sometimes lets children suffer the results of their temper-tantrum.
So Dems are children - children keeping the POTUS from winning - because the POTUS needs to let them work through their tantrum? Do I have your position right?

Damn - I hope you don't have kids...
 
No of course not. But if you don't want Republicans to have the ability to run roughshod over the Democrats in both chambers of Congress then don't elect them to majorities in both.

Someone else is claiming that it's hard to succeed day one because of the Dems.

I've merely been pointing out that the Reps have been running roughshod over them so his claim really isn't all that accurate.

No value statement or expression of what I do or don't want is inherent in pointing that out.
 
So Dems are children - children keeping the POTUS from winning - because the POTUS needs to let them work through their tantrum? Do I have your position right?

Damn - I hope you don't have kids...
So, you support Senators not doing their sworn duty and walking out of a meeting multiple times? Nice.

And no you don't at all have my position correct. Childish behavior has consequences. And, BTW, good parents and good mature adults don't reward bad behavior.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT