Interesting, looking forward to something substantiative. Is this the extent of the report?
I think it's always good to watch a little from sides.. or read. Because the truth is always somewhere in the middle. In today's media, spin is everywhere.
Yep, that's it.
All they have is the DOJ and the FBI breaking the law for a presidential candidate.
That's the extent.
Given that everyone that touched the case has been fired, what makes you think she was ever investigated before now?
Its great that you post someone else's opinion, but all the items I've read would state that he is lying or wrong. Can you identify which charge against Manafort has anything to do with the Trump campaign and IT's collusion with Russia? Based on pbs.org (first site on my google search):
An actual investigation is all that stands in the way.
Drink your juice box and color for awhile. We'll be there before you know it.
We've all figured out that if it doesn't come from some leftist rag like ThinkProgress, you think it's wingnut rhetoric and fantasy. Not a shocking admission on your part. It's that obvious.As you know, I consider about 90% of the wingnut rhetoric to be fantasy unless it's proven otherwise.
I've also been farting in your cereal box every morning.
Lol.I'm on #841. When you give a forthright explanation and engage in a dialogue of why, if she is such a criminal, she hasn't been charged, I'll answer a question. When you explain the distinction between intellectual honesty and hypocrisy, I'll answer another.
Gotta tell ya Frank, I think that alcohol and both "before" girls would be more fun than tacos. The cocaine "after" girl is just Mick Jagger.
Thanks. Nope, I respectfully decline to assume the burden of satisfying a MAGA guy with a factual analysis of anything. I might as well go yell at the clouds. The change in the platform to Ukraine is pretty obvious to me, but convincing you it's true or that it suggests anything is a quixotic task.
So a material shift in party platform isn't part of the election? Or is it that the campaign chairman getting illegal payments from benefetted parties isn't relevant to the campaign? Help me understand...Then stay in your clouds. I posted a link to an article from PBS that clearly outlined all the charges against Manafort, and they are clearly related to Crimea and have nothing to do with the current election. But keep lying to yourself if it helps you maintain your narrative.
So a material shift in party platform isn't part of the election? Or is it that the campaign chairman getting illegal payments from benefetted parties isn't relevant to the campaign? Help me understand...
You don't think its a stretch to equate improper lobby reporting (and tax evasion) related to the meetings regarding the Crimea conflict in 2014 as Trump Campaign election collusion?
I don't think it is a stretch to think that Mannafort's illegal commercial relationships impacted the campaign as evidenced by the abrupt TrumpYou don't think its a stretch to equate improper lobby reporting (and tax evasion) related to the meetings regarding the Crimea conflict in 2014 as Trump Campaign election collusion?
I don't think it is a stretch to think that Mannafory's illegal commercial relationships impacted the campaign as evidenced by the abrupt Trump left
turn around at the Republican Convention on issues related to Crimea.
Classic response - "otard and cank". You always come through!refresh my memory otards reaction was what
when russian tanks rolled over the border and a civilian airliner was shot down?
otards reaction was what when all-state
joe biden was absolutely giddy at his press conference before ukranian elections
is the previous administrations action incompetence
and manafarts the yellow brick road to collusion?
it’s like cank is feeding the libtard world at her bosom
Classic response - "otard and cank". You always come through!
You'll get your report, no worries there.congrats
you can read collusion into anything
can’t wait for the proof
then top it off
with a detailed report of the investigative process