ADVERTISEMENT

Mueller - Russia probe

I think it's always good to watch a little from sides.. or read. Because the truth is always somewhere in the middle. In today's media, spin is everywhere.



Yep, that's it.

All they have is the DOJ and the FBI breaking the law for a presidential candidate.

That's the extent.

So somebody will finally charge her? Or will this just fizzle and we'll have 5 more years of bitching?
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
Given that everyone that touched the case has been fired, what makes you think she was ever investigated before now?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007

Its great that you post someone else's opinion, but all the items I've read would state that he is lying or wrong. Can you identify which charge against Manafort has anything to do with the Trump campaign and IT's collusion with Russia? Based on pbs.org (first site on my google search):

"Prosecutors allege that Manafort and Gates worked as unregistered agents of the government of Ukraine and the Party of Regions, a pro-Russian political party led by Victor Yanukovych. While serving as president of the former Soviet republic from 2010 to 2014, Yanukovych was closely aligned with Russian President Vladimir Putin."
 
Given that everyone that touched the case has been fired, what makes you think she was ever investigated before now?

I haven't followed it. As you know, I consider about 90% of the wingnut rhetoric to be fantasy unless it's proven otherwise. I don't think you need any more examples of that dynamic. I did look at the STrok (?) outrageous scandal and he plainly didn't like Trump or Hillary -- hardly a hallmark of corruption, imo. Then, the whole Comey right before the electino announcing that HRC was under investigation again... and now he was pro-Hillary? These are the reasons I don't follow the spin.

So what are the excuses not to charge her? I've melted the boards down with that question and nobody will address it. Is the reason because she hasn't been investigated? This board sure uncovered supposedly scandalous facts and expressed the opinion regarding her culpability. Are her crimes known or not? If they're so open and notorious, how much investigation does this take? Weren't there also parallel congressional investigations? WTF IS TAKING SO LONG?
 
Its great that you post someone else's opinion, but all the items I've read would state that he is lying or wrong. Can you identify which charge against Manafort has anything to do with the Trump campaign and IT's collusion with Russia? Based on pbs.org (first site on my google search):

Thanks. Nope, I respectfully decline to assume the burden of satisfying a MAGA guy with a factual analysis of anything. I might as well go yell at the clouds. The change in the platform to Ukraine is pretty obvious to me, but convincing you it's true or that it suggests anything is a quixotic task.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
An actual investigation is all that stands in the way.

Drink your juice box and color for awhile. We'll be there before you know it.

I've had three bottles of juice and worked through 5 color books. I have to pee, I'm bored, and I need some movement or I'm gonna puke all over the back seat. It's been years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
As you know, I consider about 90% of the wingnut rhetoric to be fantasy unless it's proven otherwise.
We've all figured out that if it doesn't come from some leftist rag like ThinkProgress, you think it's wingnut rhetoric and fantasy. Not a shocking admission on your part. It's that obvious.
 
I'm on #841. When you give a forthright explanation and engage in a dialogue of why, if she is such a criminal, she hasn't been charged, I'll answer a question. When you explain the distinction between intellectual honesty and hypocrisy, I'll answer another.



Gotta tell ya Frank, I think that alcohol and both "before" girls would be more fun than tacos. The cocaine "after" girl is just Mick Jagger.
Lol.
 
Thanks. Nope, I respectfully decline to assume the burden of satisfying a MAGA guy with a factual analysis of anything. I might as well go yell at the clouds. The change in the platform to Ukraine is pretty obvious to me, but convincing you it's true or that it suggests anything is a quixotic task.

Then stay in your clouds. I posted a link to an article from PBS that clearly outlined all the charges against Manafort, and they are clearly related to Crimea and have nothing to do with the current election. But keep lying to yourself if it helps you maintain your narrative.
 
Then stay in your clouds. I posted a link to an article from PBS that clearly outlined all the charges against Manafort, and they are clearly related to Crimea and have nothing to do with the current election. But keep lying to yourself if it helps you maintain your narrative.
So a material shift in party platform isn't part of the election? Or is it that the campaign chairman getting illegal payments from benefetted parties isn't relevant to the campaign? Help me understand...
 
So a material shift in party platform isn't part of the election? Or is it that the campaign chairman getting illegal payments from benefetted parties isn't relevant to the campaign? Help me understand...

You don't think its a stretch to equate improper lobby reporting (and tax evasion) related to the meetings regarding the Crimea conflict in 2014 as Trump Campaign election collusion?
 
You don't think its a stretch to equate improper lobby reporting (and tax evasion) related to the meetings regarding the Crimea conflict in 2014 as Trump Campaign election collusion?


hell no he won’t
 
You don't think its a stretch to equate improper lobby reporting (and tax evasion) related to the meetings regarding the Crimea conflict in 2014 as Trump Campaign election collusion?
I don't think it is a stretch to think that Mannafort's illegal commercial relationships impacted the campaign as evidenced by the abrupt Trump
turn around at the Republican Convention on issues related to Crimea.
 
Last edited:
I don't think it is a stretch to think that Mannafory's illegal commercial relationships impacted the campaign as evidenced by the abrupt Trump left
turn around at the Republican Convention on issues related to Crimea.


refresh my memory otards reaction was what
when russian tanks rolled over the border and a civilian airliner was shot down?

otards reaction was what when all-state
joe biden was absolutely giddy at his press conference before ukranian elections

is the previous administrations action incompetence

and manafarts the yellow brick road to collusion?

it’s like cank is feeding the libtard world at her bosom
 
refresh my memory otards reaction was what
when russian tanks rolled over the border and a civilian airliner was shot down?

otards reaction was what when all-state
joe biden was absolutely giddy at his press conference before ukranian elections

is the previous administrations action incompetence

and manafarts the yellow brick road to collusion?

it’s like cank is feeding the libtard world at her bosom
Classic response - "otard and cank". You always come through!
 
Classic response - "otard and cank". You always come through!


congrats
you can read collusion into anything

can’t wait for the proof

then top it off
with a detailed report of the investigative process
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT