MSNBC opening monologue

[SUPERPOKES]

This is the opening monologue of Nicole Wallace on MSNBC’s Deadline White House show that started at 4 p.m. today.

“Take a supremely qualified elected leader, throw in a positive and optimistic message about the future, and throw in a dash of Beyoncé, and what do you get? A rousing start to a presidential campaign against a wannabe autocrat and convicted felon with a doom and gloom Earth 2 vision of the country which he seeks to lead.”

Then, for free, it played the new Kamala Harris for president advertisement.

This is a news network? What a joke!

Now I know that FoxNews is slanted to the right, but MSNBC is ridiculous. There should be some kinda warning label when you turn it to that network!

 

[ClintonDavidScott]

This is the opening monologue of MSNBC’s Deadline White House show that started at 4 p.m. today.

“Take a supremely qualified elected leader, throw in a positive and optimistic message about the future, and throw in a dash of Beyoncé, and what do you get? A rousing start to a presidential campaign against a wannabe autocrat and convicted felon with a doom and gloom Earth 2 vision of the country which he seeks to lead.”

Then, for free, it played the new Kamala Harris for president advertisement.

This is a news network? What a joke!

Now I know that FoxNews is slanted to the right, but MSNBC is ridiculous. There should be some kinda warning label when you turn it to that network!

Fox News is just as ridiculous. Be honest for a change, man.





carry on

 

[SUPERPOKES]

Fox News is just as ridiculous. Be honest for a change, man.





carry on

I’ve given you an actual quote from an MSNBC anchor. Give me one from FoxNews.

 

[N. Pappagiorgio]

I’ve given you an actual quote from an MSNBC anchor. Give me one from FoxNews.

Good luck with that.

 

[ClintonDavidScott]

I’ve given you an actual quote from an MSNBC anchor. Give me one from FoxNews.

How bout the various quotes that culminated in…



$787 million.


Too many to list…






carry on

 

[SUPERPOKES]

How bout the various quotes that culminated in…



$787 million.


Too many to list…






carry on

Figures. Too many, you say, but you can’t give ONE. 🤦🏼‍♂️

 

[OUSOONER67]

Does anyone hate her more than Bill?

 

[SUPERPOKES]

Does anyone hate her more than Bill?

View embedded media

Will someone please tell me how the Russians are influencing our elections??? I never understood that one. We’re they using some sort of Jedi mind tricks on us or something to make us vote a certain way?

 

[HighStickHarry]

Fox News is just as ridiculous. Be honest for a change, man.





carry on

This is not true. Multiple personalities on fox lit trump up for years. Can you point to the same from msnbc? Can you think if an equivalent of covering up the dementia of Biden for years until the debate?

 

[HighStickHarry]

How bout the various quotes that culminated in…



$787 million.


Too many to list…






carry on

Fox News specifically hannity nailed the Russian collusion story. If it wasn’t for Fox News cable media would be no better than North Korea. Fox News is biased. MSNBC is a cast of cartoon characters. Who is the joy Reid of Fox News?

 

[OUSOONER67]

Will someone please tell me how the Russians are influencing our elections??? I never understood that one. We’re they using some sort of Jedi mind tricks on us or something to make us vote a certain way?

She paid for the whole phony muh Russia Hoax, she has to keep pushing it because she will never admit it.
Bill is sitting there like, she is gonna drag me down to hell with her I just know it. 🤣

 

[22LR]

Fox News specifically hannity nailed the Russian collusion story. If it wasn’t for Fox News cable media would be no better than North Korea. Fox News is biased. MSNBC is a cast of cartoon characters. Who is the joy Reid of Fox News?

Umm

 

[Tulsaaggieson]

Will someone please tell me how the Russians are influencing our elections??? I never understood that one. We’re they using some sort of Jedi mind tricks on us or something to make us vote a certain way?

In the past Russian used propaganda campaigns to try and prop up politicians that were more friendly to the USSR and Communism. In fact, they did this every election. When Putin took back over Russia tried to use propaganda to influence the elections in the US for people who were more friendly to Russia. I have never seen any evidence of vote tampering by Russia, and typically the kind of politician they were looking for were people who were socialist in nature. Russian has, since WWII, been actively trying to turn the US into a Communist nation, and they have been more successful over time than one might imagine. It's unclear if these efforts are still ongoing, but the effects certainly are. They targeted college campuses specifically, and if we look at our campuses these days, I will call their mission a success.

As a general rule, nations from around the world are all trying to influence the US elections and doing so in their own interests. There has been millions given by nations unfriendly to the US including China in the past. The Clintons took a lot of campaign donations from China alone, and then turned a blind eye when China stole nuclear secrets.

It's not hard to make the claim that Russia interfered in the election. Most likely they did, but to what effect and what they were trying to achieve is muddy at best.

 

[SUPERPOKES]

In the past Russian used propaganda campaigns to try and prop up politicians that were more friendly to the USSR and Communism. In fact, they did this every election. When Putin took back over Russia tried to use propaganda to influence the elections in the US for people who were more friendly to Russia. I have never seen any evidence of vote tampering by Russia, and typically the kind of politician they were looking for were people who were socialist in nature. Russian has, since WWII, been actively trying to turn the US into a Communist nation, and they have been more successful over time than one might imagine. It's unclear if these efforts are still ongoing, but the effects certainly are. They targeted college campuses specifically, and if we look at our campuses these days, I will call their mission a success.

As a general rule, nations from around the world are all trying to influence the US elections and doing so in their own interests. There has been millions given by nations unfriendly to the US including China in the past. The Clintons took a lot of campaign donations from China alone, and then turned a blind eye when China stole nuclear secrets.

It's not hard to make the claim that Russia interfered in the election. Most likely they did, but to what effect and what they were trying to achieve is muddy at best.

So some weak minded fence-sitter had their mind made up by Russian propaganda? Got news for everyone: there are a lot of other things that could have had a bigger impact than the Russians or the Chinese.

 

[Tulsaaggieson]

So some weak minded fence-sitter had their mind made up by Russian propaganda? Got news for everyone: there are a lot of other things that could have had a bigger impact than the Russians or the Chinese.

Thats why the Russia Hoax is so idiotic to begin with. Even if there were influence it was minimal and already baked in.